Is Classnames Safe?

Classnames — Nerq Trust Score 57.2/100 (C grade). Based on analysis of 2 trust dimensions, it is has notable safety concerns. Last updated: 2026-08-02.

Use Classnames with some caution. Classnames is a Rust crate with a Nerq Trust Score of 57.2/100 (C), based on 3 independent data dimensions. Below the recommended threshold of 70. Security: 90/100. Popularity: 60/100. Data sourced from crates.io registry, GitHub, NVD, and RustSec advisory database. Last updated: 2026-03-24. Machine-readable data (JSON).

Is Classnames safe?

CAUTION — Classnames has a Nerq Trust Score of 57.2/100 (C). It has moderate trust signals but shows some areas of concern that warrant attention. Suitable for development use — review security and maintenance signals before production deployment.

Security Analysis → Classnames Privacy Report →

What is Classnames's trust score?

Classnames has a Nerq Trust Score of 57.2/100, earning a C grade. This score is based on 2 independently measured dimensions including security, maintenance, and community adoption.

Security
90
Popularity
60

What are the key security findings for Classnames?

Classnames's strongest signal is security at 90/100. No known vulnerabilities have been detected. It has not yet reached the Nerq Verified threshold of 70+.

Security score: 90/100 (strong)
Popularity: 60/100 — community adoption

What is Classnames and who maintains it?

AuthorUnknown
CategoryRust Crates
SourceN/A

Classnames Across Platforms

Same developer/company in other registries:

ClassNames
46/100 · nuget

Similar Crates by Trust Score

indexmap (63)crypto-common (63)darling_core (63)windows-core (63)oorandom (63)
See all safest Crates →

Compare

Classnames vs indexmapClassnames vs crypto-commonClassnames vs darling_core

Safety Guide: Classnames

What is Classnames?

Classnames is a Rust crate — Library for generating BEM style classnames.

How to Verify Safety

Run cargo audit. Review on crates.io for activity.

You can also check the trust score via API: GET /v1/preflight?target=classnames

Key Safety Concerns for Rust crate

When evaluating any Rust crate, watch for: dependency vulnerabilities, unsafe code, maintenance status.

Trust Assessment

Classnames has a Nerq Trust Score of 57/100 (C) and has not yet reached Nerq trust threshold (70+). This score is based on automated analysis of security, maintenance, community, and quality signals.

Key Takeaways

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Classnames Safe?
Use with some caution. classnames with a Nerq Trust Score of 57.2/100 (C). Strongest signal: security (90/100). Score based on Security (90/100), Popularity (60/100).
What is Classnames's trust score?
classnames: 57.2/100 (C). Score based on Security (90/100), Popularity (60/100). Scores update as new data becomes available. API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=classnames
What are safer alternatives to Classnames?
In the Rust Crates category, more Rust crates are being analyzed — check back soon. classnames scores 57.2/100.
Does Classnames have known vulnerabilities?
Nerq checks Classnames against NVD, OSV.dev, and registry-specific vulnerability databases. Current security score: 90/100. Run your package manager's audit command for the latest findings.
Does Classnames use unsafe code?
Check Classnames's crate documentation for unsafe code usage. Trust score: 57.2/100. Fewer unsafe blocks generally indicates better memory safety.
API: /v1/preflight Trust Badge API Docs

Browse Categories

See Also

Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.

We use cookies for analytics and caching. Privacy