Is Clawdaddy Safe?
Clawdaddy is a software tool with a Nerq Trust Score of 62.2/100 (C). It is below the recommended threshold of 70. Security: 0/100. Maintenance: 1/100. Popularity: 0/100. Data sourced from multiple public sources including package registries, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev, and OpenSSF Scorecard. Last updated: 2026-03-24. Machine-readable data (JSON).
Is Clawdaddy safe?
CAUTION — Clawdaddy has a Nerq Trust Score of 62.2/100 (C). It has moderate trust signals but shows some areas of concern that warrant attention. Suitable for development use — review security and maintenance signals before production deployment.
Trust Score Breakdown
Key Findings
Details
| Author | rendrag-git |
| Category | devops |
| Source | https://github.com/rendrag-git/clawdaddy |
Regulatory Compliance
| EU AI Act Risk Class | MINIMAL |
| Compliance Score | 84/100 |
| Jurisdictions | Assessed across 52 jurisdictions |
Popular Alternatives in devops
What Is Clawdaddy?
Clawdaddy is a DevOps tool: Managed hosting for OpenClaw AI assistants. Nerq Trust Score: 62/100 (C).
Nerq independently analyzes every software tool, app, and extension across multiple trust signals including security vulnerabilities, maintenance activity, license compliance, and community adoption.
How Nerq Assesses Clawdaddy's Safety
Nerq's Trust Score is calculated from 13+ independent signals aggregated into five dimensions. Here is how Clawdaddy performs in each:
- Security (0/100): Clawdaddy's security posture is poor. This score factors in known CVEs, dependency vulnerabilities, security policy presence, and code signing practices.
- Maintenance (1/100): Clawdaddy is potentially abandoned. We track commit frequency, release cadence, issue response times, and PR merge rates.
- Documentation (0/100): Documentation quality is insufficient. This includes README completeness, API documentation, usage examples, and contribution guidelines.
- Compliance (84/100): Clawdaddy is broadly compliant. Assessed against regulations in 52 jurisdictions including the EU AI Act, CCPA, and GDPR.
- Community (0/100): Community adoption is limited. Based on GitHub stars, forks, download counts, and ecosystem integrations.
The overall Trust Score of 62.2/100 (C) reflects the weighted combination of these signals. This is below the Nerq Verified threshold of 70. We recommend additional due diligence before production deployment.
Who Should Use Clawdaddy?
Clawdaddy is designed for:
- Developers and teams working with devops tools
- Organizations evaluating AI tools for their stack
- Researchers exploring AI capabilities in this domain
Risk guidance: Clawdaddy is suitable for development and testing environments. Before production deployment, conduct a thorough review of its security posture, review the specific trust signals above, and consider whether a higher-scored alternative meets your requirements.
How to Verify Clawdaddy's Safety Yourself
While Nerq provides automated trust analysis, we recommend these additional steps before adopting any software tool:
- Check the source code — Review the repository's security policy, open issues, and recent commits for signs of active maintenance.
- Scan dependencies — Use tools like
npm audit,pip-audit, orsnykto check for known vulnerabilities in Clawdaddy's dependency tree. - Review permissions — Understand what access Clawdaddy requires. Software tools should follow the principle of least privilege.
- Test in isolation — Run Clawdaddy in a sandboxed environment before granting access to production data or systems.
- Monitor continuously — Use Nerq's API to set up automated trust checks:
GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=clawdaddy - Review the license — Confirm that Clawdaddy's license is compatible with your intended use case. Pay attention to restrictions on commercial use, redistribution, and derivative works. Some AI tools use dual licensing or have separate terms for enterprise customers that differ from the open-source license.
- Check community signals — Look at the project's issue tracker, discussion forums, and social media presence. A healthy community actively reports bugs, contributes fixes, and discusses security concerns openly. Low community engagement may indicate limited peer review of the codebase.
Common Safety Concerns with Clawdaddy
When evaluating whether Clawdaddy is safe, consider these category-specific risks:
Understand how Clawdaddy processes, stores, and transmits your data. Review the tool's privacy policy and data retention practices, especially for sensitive or proprietary information.
Check Clawdaddy's dependency tree for known vulnerabilities. Tools with outdated or unmaintained dependencies pose a higher security risk.
Regularly check for updates to Clawdaddy. Security patches and bug fixes are only effective if you're running the latest version.
If Clawdaddy connects to external APIs or services, each integration point is a potential attack surface. Audit all third-party connections, verify that data shared with external services is minimized, and ensure that integration credentials are rotated regularly.
Verify that Clawdaddy's license is compatible with your intended use case. Some AI tools have restrictive licenses that limit commercial use, redistribution, or derivative works. Using Clawdaddy in violation of its license can expose your organization to legal liability.
Clawdaddy and the EU AI Act
Clawdaddy is classified as Minimal Risk under the EU AI Act. This is the lowest risk category, meaning it faces minimal regulatory requirements. However, transparency obligations still apply.
Nerq's compliance assessment covers 52 jurisdictions worldwide. For organizations deploying AI tools in regulated environments, understanding these classifications is essential for legal compliance.
Best Practices for Using Clawdaddy Safely
Whether you're an individual developer or an enterprise team, these practices will help you get the most from Clawdaddy while minimizing risk:
Periodically review how Clawdaddy is used in your workflow. Check for unexpected behavior, permissions drift, and compliance with your security policies.
Ensure Clawdaddy and all its dependencies are running the latest stable versions to benefit from security patches.
Grant Clawdaddy only the minimum permissions it needs to function. Avoid granting admin or root access.
Subscribe to Clawdaddy's security advisories and vulnerability disclosures. Use Nerq's API to get automated trust score updates.
Create and maintain a clear policy for how Clawdaddy is used within your organization, including data handling guidelines and acceptable use cases.
When Should You Avoid Clawdaddy?
Even promising tools aren't right for every situation. Consider avoiding Clawdaddy in these scenarios:
- Production environments handling sensitive customer data
- Regulated industries (healthcare, finance, government) without additional compliance review
- Mission-critical systems where downtime has significant business impact
For each scenario, evaluate whether Clawdaddy's trust score of 62.2/100 meets your organization's risk tolerance. We recommend running a manual security assessment alongside the automated Nerq score.
How Clawdaddy Compares to Industry Standards
Nerq indexes over 6 million software tools, apps, and packages across dozens of categories. Among DevOps tools, the average Trust Score is 63/100. Clawdaddy's score of 62.2/100 is near the category average of 63/100.
This places Clawdaddy in line with the typical DevOps tool tool. It meets baseline expectations but does not distinguish itself from peers on trust metrics.
Industry benchmarks matter because they contextualize a tool's safety profile. A score that looks moderate in isolation may actually represent strong performance within a challenging category — or vice versa. Nerq's category-relative analysis helps teams make informed decisions by showing not just absolute quality, but how a tool ranks against its direct peers.
Trust Score History
Nerq continuously monitors Clawdaddy and recalculates its Trust Score as new data becomes available. Our scoring engine ingests real-time signals from source repositories, vulnerability databases (NVD, OSV.dev), package registries, and community metrics. When a new CVE is published, a major release ships, or maintenance patterns change, Clawdaddy's score is updated within 24 hours.
Historical trust trends reveal whether a tool is improving, stable, or declining over time. A tool that consistently maintains or improves its score demonstrates ongoing commitment to security and quality. Conversely, a downward trend may signal reduced maintenance, growing technical debt, or unresolved vulnerabilities. To track Clawdaddy's score over time, use the Nerq API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=clawdaddy&include=history
Nerq retains trust score snapshots at regular intervals, enabling trend analysis across weeks and months. Enterprise users can access detailed historical reports showing how each dimension — security, maintenance, documentation, compliance, and community — has evolved independently, providing granular visibility into which aspects of Clawdaddy are strengthening or weakening over time.
Clawdaddy vs Alternatives
In the devops category, Clawdaddy scores 62.2/100. There are higher-scoring alternatives available. For a detailed comparison, see:
- Clawdaddy vs ansible — Trust Score: 84.3/100
- Clawdaddy vs Flowise — Trust Score: 76.9/100
- Clawdaddy vs continue — Trust Score: 84.4/100
Key Takeaways
- Clawdaddy has a Trust Score of 62.2/100 (C) and is not yet Nerq Verified.
- Clawdaddy shows moderate trust signals. Conduct thorough due diligence before deploying to production environments.
- Among DevOps tools, Clawdaddy scores near the category average of 63/100, suggesting room for improvement relative to peers.
- Always verify safety independently — use Nerq's Preflight API for automated, up-to-date trust checks before integration.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Clawdaddy safe to use?
What is Clawdaddy's trust score?
What are safer alternatives to Clawdaddy?
How often is Clawdaddy's safety score updated?
Can I use Clawdaddy in a regulated environment?
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.