Is Cursor Cc Plugins Safe?

Use Cursor Cc Plugins with some caution. Cursor Cc Plugins is a software tool with a Nerq Trust Score of 67.7/100 (C), based on 5 independent data dimensions. It is below the recommended threshold of 70. Security: 0/100. Maintenance: 1/100. Popularity: 0/100. Data sourced from multiple public sources including package registries, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev, and OpenSSF Scorecard. Last updated: 2026-03-25. Machine-readable data (JSON).

Is Cursor Cc Plugins safe?

CAUTION — Cursor Cc Plugins has a Nerq Trust Score of 67.7/100 (C). It has moderate trust signals but shows some areas of concern that warrant attention. Suitable for development use — review security and maintenance signals before production deployment.

Trust Score Breakdown

Security
0
Compliance
100
Maintenance
1
Documentation
1
Popularity
0

Key Findings

Security score: 0/100 (weak)
Maintenance: 1/100 — low maintenance activity
Compliance: 100/100 — covers 52 of 52 jurisdictions
Documentation: 1/100 — limited documentation
Popularity: 0/100 — community adoption

Details

AuthorChachamaru127
Categorydevops
Sourcehttps://github.com/Chachamaru127/cursor-cc-plugins
Frameworksanthropic

Regulatory Compliance

EU AI Act Risk ClassMINIMAL
Compliance Score100/100
JurisdictionsAssessed across 52 jurisdictions

Popular Alternatives in devops

ansible/ansible
84.3/100 · A
github
FlowiseAI/Flowise
76.9/100 · B
github
continuedev/continue
84.4/100 · A
github
wshobson/agents
88.7/100 · A
github
nrwl/nx
85.9/100 · A
github

Cursor Cc Plugins Across Platforms

Same developer/company in other registries:

@chachamaru127/harness-mem
63/100 · npm

What Is Cursor Cc Plugins?

Cursor Cc Plugins is a DevOps tool: Cursor ↔ Claude Code 2-agent workflow plugin for task management and CI/CD auto-fix.. Nerq Trust Score: 68/100 (C).

Nerq independently analyzes every software tool, app, and extension across multiple trust signals including security vulnerabilities, maintenance activity, license compliance, and community adoption.

How Nerq Assesses Cursor Cc Plugins's Safety

Nerq's Trust Score is calculated from 13+ independent signals aggregated into five dimensions. Here is how Cursor Cc Plugins performs in each:

The overall Trust Score of 67.7/100 (C) reflects the weighted combination of these signals. This is below the Nerq Verified threshold of 70. We recommend additional due diligence before production deployment.

Who Should Use Cursor Cc Plugins?

Cursor Cc Plugins is designed for:

Risk guidance: Cursor Cc Plugins is suitable for development and testing environments. Before production deployment, conduct a thorough review of its security posture, review the specific trust signals above, and consider whether a higher-scored alternative meets your requirements.

How to Verify Cursor Cc Plugins's Safety Yourself

While Nerq provides automated trust analysis, we recommend these additional steps before adopting any software tool:

  1. Check the source code — Review the repository's security policy, open issues, and recent commits for signs of active maintenance.
  2. Scan dependencies — Use tools like npm audit, pip-audit, or snyk to check for known vulnerabilities in Cursor Cc Plugins's dependency tree.
  3. Review permissions — Understand what access Cursor Cc Plugins requires. Software tools should follow the principle of least privilege.
  4. Test in isolation — Run Cursor Cc Plugins in a sandboxed environment before granting access to production data or systems.
  5. Monitor continuously — Use Nerq's API to set up automated trust checks: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=cursor-cc-plugins
  6. Review the license — Confirm that Cursor Cc Plugins's license is compatible with your intended use case. Pay attention to restrictions on commercial use, redistribution, and derivative works. Some AI tools use dual licensing or have separate terms for enterprise customers that differ from the open-source license.
  7. Check community signals — Look at the project's issue tracker, discussion forums, and social media presence. A healthy community actively reports bugs, contributes fixes, and discusses security concerns openly. Low community engagement may indicate limited peer review of the codebase.

Common Safety Concerns with Cursor Cc Plugins

When evaluating whether Cursor Cc Plugins is safe, consider these category-specific risks:

Data handling

Understand how Cursor Cc Plugins processes, stores, and transmits your data. Review the tool's privacy policy and data retention practices, especially for sensitive or proprietary information.

Dependency security

Check Cursor Cc Plugins's dependency tree for known vulnerabilities. Tools with outdated or unmaintained dependencies pose a higher security risk.

Update frequency

Regularly check for updates to Cursor Cc Plugins. Security patches and bug fixes are only effective if you're running the latest version.

Third-party integrations

If Cursor Cc Plugins connects to external APIs or services, each integration point is a potential attack surface. Audit all third-party connections, verify that data shared with external services is minimized, and ensure that integration credentials are rotated regularly.

License and IP compliance

Verify that Cursor Cc Plugins's license is compatible with your intended use case. Some AI tools have restrictive licenses that limit commercial use, redistribution, or derivative works. Using Cursor Cc Plugins in violation of its license can expose your organization to legal liability.

Cursor Cc Plugins and the EU AI Act

Cursor Cc Plugins is classified as Minimal Risk under the EU AI Act. This is the lowest risk category, meaning it faces minimal regulatory requirements. However, transparency obligations still apply.

Nerq's compliance assessment covers 52 jurisdictions worldwide. For organizations deploying AI tools in regulated environments, understanding these classifications is essential for legal compliance.

Best Practices for Using Cursor Cc Plugins Safely

Whether you're an individual developer or an enterprise team, these practices will help you get the most from Cursor Cc Plugins while minimizing risk:

Conduct regular audits

Periodically review how Cursor Cc Plugins is used in your workflow. Check for unexpected behavior, permissions drift, and compliance with your security policies.

Keep dependencies updated

Ensure Cursor Cc Plugins and all its dependencies are running the latest stable versions to benefit from security patches.

Follow least privilege

Grant Cursor Cc Plugins only the minimum permissions it needs to function. Avoid granting admin or root access.

Monitor for security advisories

Subscribe to Cursor Cc Plugins's security advisories and vulnerability disclosures. Use Nerq's API to get automated trust score updates.

Document usage policies

Create and maintain a clear policy for how Cursor Cc Plugins is used within your organization, including data handling guidelines and acceptable use cases.

When Should You Avoid Cursor Cc Plugins?

Even promising tools aren't right for every situation. Consider avoiding Cursor Cc Plugins in these scenarios:

For each scenario, evaluate whether Cursor Cc Plugins's trust score of 67.7/100 meets your organization's risk tolerance. We recommend running a manual security assessment alongside the automated Nerq score.

How Cursor Cc Plugins Compares to Industry Standards

Nerq indexes over 6 million software tools, apps, and packages across dozens of categories. Among DevOps tools, the average Trust Score is 63/100. Cursor Cc Plugins's score of 67.7/100 is above the category average of 63/100.

This positions Cursor Cc Plugins favorably among DevOps tools. While it outperforms the average, there is still room for improvement in certain trust dimensions.

Industry benchmarks matter because they contextualize a tool's safety profile. A score that looks moderate in isolation may actually represent strong performance within a challenging category — or vice versa. Nerq's category-relative analysis helps teams make informed decisions by showing not just absolute quality, but how a tool ranks against its direct peers.

Trust Score History

Nerq continuously monitors Cursor Cc Plugins and recalculates its Trust Score as new data becomes available. Our scoring engine ingests real-time signals from source repositories, vulnerability databases (NVD, OSV.dev), package registries, and community metrics. When a new CVE is published, a major release ships, or maintenance patterns change, Cursor Cc Plugins's score is updated within 24 hours.

Historical trust trends reveal whether a tool is improving, stable, or declining over time. A tool that consistently maintains or improves its score demonstrates ongoing commitment to security and quality. Conversely, a downward trend may signal reduced maintenance, growing technical debt, or unresolved vulnerabilities. To track Cursor Cc Plugins's score over time, use the Nerq API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=cursor-cc-plugins&include=history

Nerq retains trust score snapshots at regular intervals, enabling trend analysis across weeks and months. Enterprise users can access detailed historical reports showing how each dimension — security, maintenance, documentation, compliance, and community — has evolved independently, providing granular visibility into which aspects of Cursor Cc Plugins are strengthening or weakening over time.

Cursor Cc Plugins vs Alternatives

In the devops category, Cursor Cc Plugins scores 67.7/100. There are higher-scoring alternatives available. For a detailed comparison, see:

Key Takeaways

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Cursor Cc Plugins safe to use?
Use with some caution. cursor-cc-plugins has a Nerq Trust Score of 67.7/100 (C). Strongest signal: compliance (100/100). Score based on security (0/100), maintenance (1/100), popularity (0/100), documentation (1/100).
What is Cursor Cc Plugins's trust score?
cursor-cc-plugins: 67.7/100 (C). Score based on: security (0/100), maintenance (1/100), popularity (0/100), documentation (1/100). Compliance: 100/100. Scores update as new data becomes available. API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=cursor-cc-plugins
What are safer alternatives to Cursor Cc Plugins?
In the devops category, higher-rated alternatives include ansible/ansible (84/100), FlowiseAI/Flowise (77/100), continuedev/continue (84/100). cursor-cc-plugins scores 67.7/100.
How often is Cursor Cc Plugins's safety score updated?
Nerq continuously monitors Cursor Cc Plugins and updates its trust score as new data becomes available. Data sourced from multiple public sources including package registries, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev, and OpenSSF Scorecard. Current: 67.7/100 (C), last verified 2026-03-25. API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=cursor-cc-plugins
Can I use Cursor Cc Plugins in a regulated environment?
Cursor Cc Plugins has not reached the Nerq Verified threshold of 70. Additional due diligence is recommended for regulated environments.
API: /v1/preflight Trust Badge API Docs

Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.