Is Cyclic 32 Safe?

Cyclic 32 — Nerq Trust Score 48.2/100 (D grade). Based on analysis of 2 trust dimensions, it is has notable safety concerns. Last updated: 2026-06-03.

Exercise caution with Cyclic 32. Cyclic 32 is a npm package with a Nerq Trust Score of 48.2/100 (D), based on 3 independent data dimensions. Below the recommended threshold of 70. Security: 90/100. Popularity: 0/100. Data sourced from npm registry, GitHub repository, NVD, OSV.dev, and OpenSSF Scorecard. Last updated: 2026-03-25. Machine-readable data (JSON).

Is Cyclic 32 safe?

NO — USE WITH CAUTION — Cyclic 32 has a Nerq Trust Score of 48.2/100 (D). It has below-average trust signals with significant gaps in security, maintenance, or documentation. Not recommended for production use without thorough manual review and additional security measures.

Security Analysis → Cyclic 32 Privacy Report →

What is Cyclic 32's trust score?

Cyclic 32 has a Nerq Trust Score of 48.2/100, earning a D grade. This score is based on 2 independently measured dimensions including security, maintenance, and community adoption.

Security
90
Popularity
0

What are the key security findings for Cyclic 32?

Cyclic 32's strongest signal is security at 90/100. No known vulnerabilities have been detected. It has not yet reached the Nerq Verified threshold of 70+.

Security score: 90/100 (strong)
Popularity: 0/100 — community adoption

What is Cyclic 32 and who maintains it?

Authorjhermsmeier
Categorynpm Packages
SourceN/A

Similar Npm by Trust Score

pulumi-improvmx (58)v3-jsoneditor (58)@khanglvm/llm-router (58)cypress-zephyr (58)@testpulse.run/reporter (58)
See all safest Npm →

Compare

Cyclic 32 vs pulumi-improvmxCyclic 32 vs v3-jsoneditorCyclic 32 vs @khanglvm/llm-router

Safety Guide: Cyclic 32

What is Cyclic 32?

Cyclic 32 is a Node.js package — Tiny, streaming, seedable CRC32 library, compatible with the crypto.Hash API.

How to Verify Safety

Run npm audit to check for vulnerabilities. Review the package's GitHub repository for recent commits.

You can also check the trust score via API: GET /v1/preflight?target=cyclic-32

Key Safety Concerns for Node.js package

When evaluating any Node.js package, watch for: dependency vulnerabilities, malicious packages, typosquatting.

Trust Assessment

Cyclic 32 has a Nerq Trust Score of 48/100 (D) and has not yet reached Nerq trust threshold (70+). This score is based on automated analysis of security, maintenance, community, and quality signals.

Key Takeaways

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Cyclic 32 Safe?
Exercise caution. cyclic-32 with a Nerq Trust Score of 48.2/100 (D). Strongest signal: security (90/100). Score based on Security (90/100), Popularity (0/100).
What is Cyclic 32's trust score?
cyclic-32: 48.2/100 (D). Score based on Security (90/100), Popularity (0/100). Scores update as new data becomes available. API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=cyclic-32
What are safer alternatives to Cyclic 32?
In the npm Packages category, more Node.js packages are being analyzed — check back soon. cyclic-32 scores 48.2/100.
Does Cyclic 32 have known vulnerabilities?
Nerq checks Cyclic 32 against NVD, OSV.dev, and registry-specific vulnerability databases. Current security score: 90/100. Run your package manager's audit command for the latest findings.
Is Cyclic 32 actively maintained?
Cyclic 32 maintenance score: N/A. Check the repository for recent commit activity and issue responsiveness.
API: /v1/preflight Trust Badge API Docs

See Also

Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.

We use cookies for analytics and caching. Privacy