Is Dapperextensions.Lambda Safe?

Dapperextensions.Lambda — Nerq Trust Score 48.2/100 (D grade). Based on analysis of 2 trust dimensions, it is has notable safety concerns. Last updated: 2026-07-29.

Exercise caution with Dapperextensions.Lambda. Dapperextensions.Lambda is a NuGet package (基于DapperExtensions 做了大量定制化开发,主要是为了更好的支持 拉姆达表达式,以及对) with a Nerq Trust Score of 48.2/100 (D), based on 3 independent data dimensions. Below the recommended threshold of 70. Security: 90/100. Popularity: 0/100. Data sourced from nuget.org, GitHub, and NVD. Last updated: 2026-03-20. Machine-readable data (JSON).

Is Dapperextensions.Lambda safe?

NO — USE WITH CAUTION — Dapperextensions.Lambda has a Nerq Trust Score of 48.2/100 (D). It has below-average trust signals with significant gaps in security, maintenance, or documentation. Not recommended for production use without thorough manual review and additional security measures.

Security Analysis → Dapperextensions.Lambda Privacy Report →

What is Dapperextensions.Lambda's trust score?

Dapperextensions.Lambda has a Nerq Trust Score of 48.2/100, earning a D grade. This score is based on 2 independently measured dimensions including security, maintenance, and community adoption.

Security
90
Popularity
0

What are the key security findings for Dapperextensions.Lambda?

Dapperextensions.Lambda's strongest signal is security at 90/100. No known vulnerabilities have been detected. It has not yet reached the Nerq Verified threshold of 70+.

Security score: 90/100 (strong)
Popularity: 0/100 — community adoption

What is Dapperextensions.Lambda and who maintains it?

AuthorDongliang yi
CategoryNuGet Packages
SourceN/A

Similar Nuget by Trust Score

Accord.Neuro (58)AathifMahir.Maui.MauiIcons.Core (58)Aardvark.Rendering.Vulkan (58)2AxisTechnology.Core.CL (58)Aardvark.Base.Tensors (58)
See all safest Nuget →

Compare

Dapperextensions.Lambda vs Accord.NeuroDapperextensions.Lambda vs AathifMahir.Maui.MauiIcons.CoreDapperextensions.Lambda vs Aardvark.Rendering.Vulkan

Safety Guide: Dapperextensions.Lambda

What is Dapperextensions.Lambda?

Dapperextensions.Lambda is a NuGet package — 基于DapperExtensions 做了大量定制化开发,主要是为了更好的支持 拉姆达表达式,以及对.NET CORE 5的支持 2021-10-19 V3.0.0.20 修复未指定 workid时自动产生的 work id 超最大限制31的BUG 2021-1-3 V3.0.0.17 修复分页关键字处理的一个BUG 2021-1-3 V3.0.0.17 修复分页关键字处理的一个BUG 2020-.

How to Verify Safety

Run dotnet list package --vulnerable. Check publisher on nuget.org.

You can also check the trust score via API: GET /v1/preflight?target=DapperExtensions.Lambda

Key Safety Concerns for NuGet package

When evaluating any NuGet package, watch for: dependency vulnerabilities, publisher verification.

Trust Assessment

Dapperextensions.Lambda has a Nerq Trust Score of 48/100 (D) and has not yet reached Nerq trust threshold (70+). This score is based on automated analysis of security, maintenance, community, and quality signals.

Key Takeaways

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Dapperextensions.Lambda Safe?
Exercise caution. DapperExtensions.Lambda with a Nerq Trust Score of 48.2/100 (D). Strongest signal: security (90/100). Score based on Security (90/100), Popularity (0/100).
What is Dapperextensions.Lambda's trust score?
DapperExtensions.Lambda: 48.2/100 (D). Score based on Security (90/100), Popularity (0/100). Scores update as new data becomes available. API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=DapperExtensions.Lambda
What are safer alternatives to Dapperextensions.Lambda?
In the NuGet Packages category, more NuGet packages are being analyzed — check back soon. DapperExtensions.Lambda scores 48.2/100.
Does Dapperextensions.Lambda have known vulnerabilities?
Nerq checks Dapperextensions.Lambda against NVD, OSV.dev, and registry-specific vulnerability databases. Current security score: 90/100. Run your package manager's audit command for the latest findings.
Is Dapperextensions.Lambda's publisher verified?
Dapperextensions.Lambda has not reached the Nerq Verified threshold of 70. Additional due diligence is recommended.
API: /v1/preflight Trust Badge API Docs

See Also

Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.

We use cookies for analytics and caching. Privacy