Is Dragonfly Mcp Server Safe?
Dragonfly Mcp Server — Nerq Trust Score 52.8/100 (D grade). Score based on 5 independent trust signals.
Dragonfly Mcp Server is a software tool with a Nerq Trust Score of 52.8/100 (D), based on 5 independent data dimensions. Security: 0/100. Maintenance: 1/100. Popularity: 0/100. Data sourced from multiple public sources including package registries, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev, and OpenSSF Scorecard. Last updated: n/a. Machine-readable data (JSON).
Is Dragonfly Mcp Server safe?
Trust Score Breakdown — Dragonfly Mcp Server has a Nerq Trust Score of 52.8/100 (D). Measured across 5 independent trust signals.
What is Dragonfly Mcp Server's trust score?
Dragonfly Mcp Server has a Nerq Trust Score of 52.8/100, earning a D grade. This score is based on 5 independently measured dimensions including security, maintenance, and community adoption.
What are the key security findings for Dragonfly Mcp Server?
Dragonfly Mcp Server's strongest signal is compliance at 100/100. No known vulnerabilities have been detected.
What is Dragonfly Mcp Server and who maintains it?
| Author | FranckDubray |
| Category | Infrastructure |
| Stars | 1 |
| Source | https://github.com/FranckDubray/dragonfly-mcp-server |
| Frameworks | openai · mcp |
| Protocols | mcp · rest |
Regulatory Compliance
| EU AI Act Risk Class | MINIMAL |
| Compliance Score | 100/100 |
| Jurisdictions | Assessed across 52 jurisdictions |
Popular Alternatives in infrastructure
What Is Dragonfly Mcp Server?
Dragonfly Mcp Server is a software tool in the infrastructure category: Dragonfly MCP Server is a robust, simple FastAPI server with auto-discovery and various tools.. It has 1 GitHub stars. Nerq Trust Score: 53/100 (D).
Nerq independently analyzes every software tool, app, and extension across multiple trust signals including security vulnerabilities, maintenance activity, license compliance, and community adoption.
How Nerq Assesses Dragonfly Mcp Server's Safety
Nerq's Trust Score is calculated from 13+ independent signals aggregated into five dimensions. Here is how Dragonfly Mcp Server performs in each:
- Security (0/100): Dragonfly Mcp Server's security posture is poor. This score factors in known CVEs, dependency vulnerabilities, security policy presence, and code signing practices.
- Maintenance (1/100): Dragonfly Mcp Server is potentially abandoned. We track commit frequency, release cadence, issue response times, and PR merge rates.
- Documentation (1/100): Documentation quality is insufficient. This includes README completeness, API documentation, usage examples, and contribution guidelines.
- Compliance (100/100): Dragonfly Mcp Server is broadly compliant. Assessed against regulations in 52 jurisdictions including the EU AI Act, CCPA, and GDPR.
- Community (0/100): Community adoption is limited. Based on GitHub stars, forks, download counts, and ecosystem integrations.
The overall Trust Score of 52.8/100 (D) is the weighted combination of these measured signals. It is a measurement, not a pass/fail or suitability judgment — weigh the individual signals against your own requirements.
Who Typically Evaluates Dragonfly Mcp Server?
Dragonfly Mcp Server is commonly evaluated by:
- Developers and teams working with infrastructure tools
- Organizations evaluating AI tools for their stack
- Researchers exploring AI capabilities in this domain
How to read the signals: Dragonfly Mcp Server's measured signals (security 0/100, maintenance 1/100, documentation 1/100, community 0/100) are shown above. These are measurements, not a suitability judgment — weigh each signal against the requirements of your own use case and risk tolerance.
How to Verify Dragonfly Mcp Server's Safety Yourself
While Nerq provides automated trust analysis, we recommend these additional steps before adopting any software tool:
- Check the source code — Review the repository's security policy, open issues, and recent commits for signs of active maintenance.
- Scan dependencies — Use tools like
npm audit,pip-audit, orsnykto check for known vulnerabilities in Dragonfly Mcp Server's dependency tree. - Review permissions — Understand what access Dragonfly Mcp Server requires. Software tools should follow the principle of least privilege.
- Test in isolation — Run Dragonfly Mcp Server in a sandboxed environment before granting access to production data or systems.
- Monitor continuously — Use Nerq's API to set up automated trust checks:
GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=dragonfly-mcp-server - Review the license — Confirm that Dragonfly Mcp Server's license is compatible with your intended use case. Pay attention to restrictions on commercial use, redistribution, and derivative works. Some AI tools use dual licensing or have separate terms for enterprise customers that differ from the open-source license.
- Check community signals — Look at the project's issue tracker, discussion forums, and social media presence. A healthy community actively reports bugs, contributes fixes, and discusses security concerns openly. Low community engagement may indicate limited peer review of the codebase.
Common Safety Concerns with Dragonfly Mcp Server
When evaluating whether Dragonfly Mcp Server is safe, consider these category-specific risks:
Understand how Dragonfly Mcp Server processes, stores, and transmits your data. Review the tool's privacy policy and data retention practices, especially for sensitive or proprietary information.
Check Dragonfly Mcp Server's dependency tree for known vulnerabilities. Tools with outdated or unmaintained dependencies pose a higher security risk.
Regularly check for updates to Dragonfly Mcp Server. Security patches and bug fixes are only effective if you're running the latest version.
If Dragonfly Mcp Server connects to external APIs or services, each integration point is a potential attack surface. Audit all third-party connections, verify that data shared with external services is minimized, and ensure that integration credentials are rotated regularly.
Verify that Dragonfly Mcp Server's license is compatible with your intended use case. Some AI tools have restrictive licenses that limit commercial use, redistribution, or derivative works. Using Dragonfly Mcp Server in violation of its license can expose your organization to legal liability.
Dragonfly Mcp Server and the EU AI Act
Dragonfly Mcp Server is classified as Minimal Risk under the EU AI Act. This is the lowest risk category, meaning it faces minimal regulatory requirements. However, transparency obligations still apply.
Nerq's compliance assessment covers 52 jurisdictions worldwide. For organizations deploying AI tools in regulated environments, understanding these classifications is essential for legal compliance.
Best Practices for Using Dragonfly Mcp Server Safely
Whether you're an individual developer or an enterprise team, these practices will help you get the most from Dragonfly Mcp Server while minimizing risk:
Periodically review how Dragonfly Mcp Server is used in your workflow. Check for unexpected behavior, permissions drift, and compliance with your security policies.
Ensure Dragonfly Mcp Server and all its dependencies are running the latest stable versions to benefit from security patches.
Grant Dragonfly Mcp Server only the minimum permissions it needs to function. Avoid granting admin or root access.
Subscribe to Dragonfly Mcp Server's security advisories and vulnerability disclosures. Use Nerq's API to get automated trust score updates.
Create and maintain a clear policy for how Dragonfly Mcp Server is used within your organization, including data handling guidelines and acceptable use cases.
Situations That Warrant Independent Review of Dragonfly Mcp Server
Nerq's signals are one input. In the following situations, evaluate Dragonfly Mcp Server's measured signals against your own requirements before making a decision:
- Environments handling sensitive or regulated data (healthcare, finance, government)
- Mission-critical systems where downtime has significant business impact
- Deployments with strict regulatory requirements that must be independently validated
For each situation, compare Dragonfly Mcp Server's measured trust score of 52.8/100 and its individual signals against your organization's own criteria. Nerq does not assert whether Dragonfly Mcp Server is suitable for any particular use.
How Dragonfly Mcp Server Compares to Industry Standards
Nerq indexes over 6 million software tools, apps, and packages across dozens of categories. Among infrastructure tools, the average Trust Score is 62/100. Dragonfly Mcp Server's score of 52.8/100 is near the category average of 62/100.
This places Dragonfly Mcp Server in line with the typical infrastructure tool tool. It meets baseline expectations but does not distinguish itself from peers on trust metrics.
Industry benchmarks matter because they contextualize a tool's safety profile. A score that looks moderate in isolation may actually represent strong performance within a challenging category — or vice versa. Nerq's category-relative analysis helps teams make informed decisions by showing not just absolute quality, but how a tool ranks against its direct peers.
Trust Score History
Nerq continuously monitors Dragonfly Mcp Server and recalculates its Trust Score as new data becomes available. Our scoring engine ingests real-time signals from source repositories, vulnerability databases (NVD, OSV.dev), package registries, and community metrics. When a new CVE is published, a major release ships, or maintenance patterns change, Dragonfly Mcp Server's score is updated within 24 hours.
Historical trust trends reveal whether a tool is improving, stable, or declining over time. A tool that consistently maintains or improves its score demonstrates ongoing commitment to security and quality. Conversely, a downward trend may signal reduced maintenance, growing technical debt, or unresolved vulnerabilities. To track Dragonfly Mcp Server's score over time, use the Nerq API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=dragonfly-mcp-server&include=history
Nerq retains trust score snapshots at regular intervals, enabling trend analysis across weeks and months. Enterprise users can access detailed historical reports showing how each dimension — security, maintenance, documentation, compliance, and community — has evolved independently, providing granular visibility into which aspects of Dragonfly Mcp Server are strengthening or weakening over time.
Dragonfly Mcp Server vs Alternatives
In the infrastructure category, Dragonfly Mcp Server scores 52.8/100. There are higher-scoring alternatives available. For a detailed comparison, see:
- Dragonfly Mcp Server vs n8n — Trust Score: 69.1/100
- Dragonfly Mcp Server vs langflow — Trust Score: 77.0/100
- Dragonfly Mcp Server vs dify — Trust Score: 69.7/100
Key Takeaways
- Dragonfly Mcp Server has a measured Nerq Trust Score of 52.8/100 (D) — a composite of independent signals, not a suitability judgment.
- Among infrastructure tools, Dragonfly Mcp Server scores near the category average of 62/100 (a positional measurement relative to peers).
- The individual signals — security, maintenance, documentation, compliance, community — are shown above. Weigh them against your own requirements.
- Query the current measured values via Nerq's Preflight API.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Dragonfly Mcp Server Safe?
What is Dragonfly Mcp Server's trust score?
What are safer alternatives to Dragonfly Mcp Server?
How often is Dragonfly Mcp Server's safety score updated?
Can I use Dragonfly Mcp Server in a regulated environment?
See Also
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated measurements based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements, verdicts, or guarantees of suitability. Always evaluate the signals against your own requirements.