Is Ej2 Lists Safe?

Ej2 Lists — Nerq Trust Score 61.2/100 (C grade). Based on analysis of 1 trust dimensions, it is generally safe but has some concerns. Last updated: 2026-04-01.

Use Ej2 Lists with some caution. Ej2 Lists is a software tool with a Nerq Trust Score of 61.2/100 (C), based on 3 independent data dimensions. It is below the recommended threshold of 70. Data sourced from multiple public sources including package registries, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev, and OpenSSF Scorecard. Last updated: 2026-04-01. Machine-readable data (JSON).

Is Ej2 Lists safe?

CAUTION — Ej2 Lists has a Nerq Trust Score of 61.2/100 (C). It has moderate trust signals but shows some areas of concern that warrant attention. Suitable for development use — review security and maintenance signals before production deployment.

Security Analysis → {name} Privacy Report →

What is Ej2 Lists's trust score?

Ej2 Lists has a Nerq Trust Score of 61.2/100, earning a C grade. This score is based on 1 independently measured dimensions including security, maintenance, and community adoption.

Compliance
100

What are the key security findings for Ej2 Lists?

Ej2 Lists's strongest signal is compliance at 100/100. No known vulnerabilities have been detected. It has not yet reached the Nerq Verified threshold of 70+.

Compliance: 100/100 — covers 52 of 52 jurisdictions

What is Ej2 Lists and who maintains it?

Authorsyncfusion-javascript
Categoryuncategorized
Sourcehttps://www.npmjs.com/package/@syncfusion/ej2-lists

Regulatory Compliance

EU AI Act Risk ClassNot assessed
Compliance Score100/100
JurisdictionsAssessed across 52 jurisdictions

What Is Ej2 Lists?

Ej2 Lists is a software tool in the uncategorized category: The listview control allows you to select an item or multiple items from a list-like interface and represents the data in interactive hierarchical structure across different layouts or views.. Nerq Trust Score: 61/100 (C).

Nerq independently analyzes every software tool, app, and extension across multiple trust signals including security vulnerabilities, maintenance activity, license compliance, and community adoption.

How Nerq Assesses Ej2 Lists's Safety

Nerq's Trust Score is calculated from 13+ independent signals aggregated into five dimensions. Here is how Ej2 Lists performs in each:

The overall Trust Score of 61.2/100 (C) reflects the weighted combination of these signals. This is below the Nerq Verified threshold of 70. We recommend additional due diligence before production deployment.

Who Should Use Ej2 Lists?

Ej2 Lists is designed for:

Risk guidance: Ej2 Lists is suitable for development and testing environments. Before production deployment, conduct a thorough review of its security posture, review the specific trust signals above, and consider whether a higher-scored alternative meets your requirements.

How to Verify Ej2 Lists's Safety Yourself

While Nerq provides automated trust analysis, we recommend these additional steps before adopting any software tool:

  1. Check the source code — Review the repository security policy, open issues, and recent commits for signs of active maintenance.
  2. Scan dependencies — Use tools like npm audit, pip-audit, or snyk to check for known vulnerabilities in Ej2 Lists's dependency tree.
  3. Review permissions — Understand what access Ej2 Lists requires. Software tools should follow the principle of least privilege.
  4. Test in isolation — Run Ej2 Lists in a sandboxed environment before granting access to production data or systems.
  5. Monitor continuously — Use Nerq's API to set up automated trust checks: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=@syncfusion/ej2-lists
  6. Review the license — Confirm that Ej2 Lists's license is compatible with your intended use case. Pay attention to restrictions on commercial use, redistribution, and derivative works. Some AI tools use dual licensing or have separate terms for enterprise customers that differ from the open-source license.
  7. Check community signals — Look at the project's issue tracker, discussion forums, and social media presence. A healthy community actively reports bugs, contributes fixes, and discusses security concerns openly. Low community engagement may indicate limited peer review of the codebase.

Common Safety Concerns with Ej2 Lists

When evaluating whether Ej2 Lists is safe, consider these category-specific risks:

Data handling

Understand how Ej2 Lists processes, stores, and transmits your data. Review the tool's privacy policy and data retention practices, especially for sensitive or proprietary information.

Dependency security

Check Ej2 Lists's dependency tree for known vulnerabilities. Tools with outdated or unmaintained dependencies pose a higher security risk.

Update frequency

Regularly check for updates to Ej2 Lists. Security patches and bug fixes are only effective if you're running the latest version.

Third-party integrations

If Ej2 Lists connects to external APIs or services, each integration point is a potential attack surface. Audit all third-party connections, verify that data shared with external services is minimized, and ensure that integration credentials are rotated regularly.

License and IP compliance

Verify that Ej2 Lists's license is compatible with your intended use case. Some AI tools have restrictive licenses that limit commercial use, redistribution, or derivative works. Using Ej2 Lists in violation of its license can expose your organization to legal liability.

Best Practices for Using Ej2 Lists Safely

Whether you're an individual developer or an enterprise team, these practices will help you get the most from Ej2 Lists while minimizing risk:

Conduct regular audits

Periodically review how Ej2 Lists is used in your workflow. Check for unexpected behavior, permissions drift, and compliance with your security policies.

Keep dependencies updated

Ensure Ej2 Lists and all its dependencies are running the latest stable versions to benefit from security patches.

Follow least privilege

Grant Ej2 Lists only the minimum permissions it needs to function. Avoid granting admin or root access.

Monitor for security advisories

Subscribe to Ej2 Lists's security advisories and vulnerability disclosures. Use Nerq's API to get automated trust score updates.

Document usage policies

Create and maintain a clear policy for how Ej2 Lists is used within your organization, including data handling guidelines and acceptable use cases.

When Should You Avoid Ej2 Lists?

Even promising tools aren't right for every situation. Consider avoiding Ej2 Lists in these scenarios:

For each scenario, evaluate whether Ej2 Lists's trust score of 61.2/100 meets your organization's risk tolerance. We recommend running a manual security assessment alongside the automated Nerq score.

How Ej2 Lists Compares to Industry Standards

Nerq indexes over 6 million software tools, apps, and packages across dozens of categories. Among uncategorized tools, the average Trust Score is 62/100. Ej2 Lists's score of 61.2/100 is near the category average of 62/100.

This places Ej2 Lists in line with the typical uncategorized tool tool. It meets baseline expectations but does not distinguish itself from peers on trust metrics.

Industry benchmarks matter because they contextualize a tool's safety profile. A score that looks moderate in isolation may actually represent strong performance within a challenging category — or vice versa. Nerq's category-relative analysis helps teams make informed decisions by showing not just absolute quality, but how a tool ranks against its direct peers.

Trust Score History

Nerq continuously monitors Ej2 Lists and recalculates its Trust Score as new data becomes available. Our scoring engine ingests real-time signals from source repositories, vulnerability databases (NVD, OSV.dev), package registries, and community metrics. When a new CVE is published, a major release ships, or maintenance patterns change, Ej2 Lists's score is updated within 24 hours.

Historical trust trends reveal whether a tool is improving, stable, or declining over time. A tool that consistently maintains or improves its score demonstrates ongoing commitment to security and quality. Conversely, a downward trend may signal reduced maintenance, growing technical debt, or unresolved vulnerabilities. To track Ej2 Lists's score over time, use the Nerq API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=@syncfusion/ej2-lists&include=history

Nerq retains trust score snapshots at regular intervals, enabling trend analysis across weeks and months. Enterprise users can access detailed historical reports showing how each dimension — security, maintenance, documentation, compliance, and community — has evolved independently, providing granular visibility into which aspects of Ej2 Lists are strengthening or weakening over time.

Key Takeaways

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Ej2 Lists safe to use?
Use with some caution. @syncfusion/ej2-lists has a Nerq Trust Score of 61.2/100 (C). Strongest signal: compliance (100/100). Score based on multiple trust dimensions.
What is Ej2 Lists's trust score?
@syncfusion/ej2-lists: 61.2/100 (C). Score based on: multiple trust dimensions. Compliance: 100/100. Scores update as new data becomes available. API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=@syncfusion/ej2-lists
What are safer alternatives to Ej2 Lists?
In the uncategorized category, more software tools are being analyzed — check back soon. @syncfusion/ej2-lists scores 61.2/100.
How often is Ej2 Lists's safety score updated?
Nerq continuously monitors Ej2 Lists and updates its trust score as new data becomes available. Data sourced from multiple public sources including package registries, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev, and OpenSSF Scorecard. Current: 61.2/100 (C), last verified 2026-04-01. API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=@syncfusion/ej2-lists
Can I use Ej2 Lists in a regulated environment?
Ej2 Lists has not reached the Nerq Verified threshold of 70. Additional due diligence is recommended for regulated environments.
API: /v1/preflight Trust Badge API Docs

Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.

We use cookies for analytics and caching. Privacy Policy