Is Example Openclaw Safe?
Example Openclaw — Nerq Trust Score 61.1/100 (C grade). Based on analysis of 5 trust dimensions, it is generally safe but has some concerns. Last updated: 2026-03-30.
Use Example Openclaw with some caution. Example Openclaw is a software tool with a Nerq Trust Score of 61.1/100 (C), based on 5 independent data dimensions. It is below the recommended threshold of 70. Security: 0/100. Maintenance: 1/100. Popularity: 0/100. Data sourced from multiple public sources including package registries, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev, and OpenSSF Scorecard. Last updated: 2026-03-30. Machine-readable data (JSON).
Is Example Openclaw safe?
CAUTION — Example Openclaw has a Nerq Trust Score of 61.1/100 (C). It has moderate trust signals but shows some areas of concern that warrant attention. Suitable for development use — review security and maintenance signals before production deployment.
What is Example Openclaw's trust score?
Example Openclaw has a Nerq Trust Score of 61.1/100, earning a C grade. This score is based on 5 independently measured dimensions including security, maintenance, and community adoption.
What are the key security findings for Example Openclaw?
Example Openclaw's strongest signal is compliance at 90/100. No known vulnerabilities have been detected. It has not yet reached the Nerq Verified threshold of 70+.
What is Example Openclaw and who maintains it?
| Author | codespacesh |
| Category | other |
| Source | https://github.com/codespacesh/example-openclaw |
Regulatory Compliance
| EU AI Act Risk Class | MINIMAL |
| Compliance Score | 90/100 |
| Jurisdictions | Assessed across 52 jurisdictions |
Popular Alternatives in other
What Is Example Openclaw?
Example Openclaw is a software tool in the other category: N/A. Nerq Trust Score: 61/100 (C).
Nerq independently analyzes every software tool, app, and extension across multiple trust signals including security vulnerabilities, maintenance activity, license compliance, and community adoption.
How Nerq Assesses Example Openclaw's Safety
Nerq's Trust Score is calculated from 13+ independent signals aggregated into five dimensions. Here is how Example Openclaw performs in each:
- Security (0/100): Example Openclaw's security posture is poor. This score factors in known CVEs, dependency vulnerabilities, security policy presence, and code signing practices.
- Maintenance (1/100): Example Openclaw is potentially abandoned. We track commit frequency, release cadence, issue response times, and PR merge rates.
- Documentation (0/100): Documentation quality is insufficient. This includes README completeness, API documentation, usage examples, and contribution guidelines.
- Compliance (90/100): Example Openclaw is broadly compliant. Assessed against regulations in 52 jurisdictions including the EU AI Act, CCPA, and GDPR.
- Community (0/100): Community adoption is limited. Based on GitHub stars, forks, download counts, and ecosystem integrations.
The overall Trust Score of 61.1/100 (C) reflects the weighted combination of these signals. This is below the Nerq Verified threshold of 70. We recommend additional due diligence before production deployment.
Who Should Use Example Openclaw?
Example Openclaw is designed for:
- Developers and teams working with other tools
- Organizations evaluating AI tools for their stack
- Researchers exploring AI capabilities in this domain
Risk guidance: Example Openclaw is suitable for development and testing environments. Before production deployment, conduct a thorough review of its security posture, review the specific trust signals above, and consider whether a higher-scored alternative meets your requirements.
How to Verify Example Openclaw's Safety Yourself
While Nerq provides automated trust analysis, we recommend these additional steps before adopting any software tool:
- Check the source code — Review the repository's security policy, open issues, and recent commits for signs of active maintenance.
- Scan dependencies — Use tools like
npm audit,pip-audit, orsnykto check for known vulnerabilities in Example Openclaw's dependency tree. - Review permissions — Understand what access Example Openclaw requires. Software tools should follow the principle of least privilege.
- Test in isolation — Run Example Openclaw in a sandboxed environment before granting access to production data or systems.
- Monitor continuously — Use Nerq's API to set up automated trust checks:
GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=example-openclaw - Review the license — Confirm that Example Openclaw's license is compatible with your intended use case. Pay attention to restrictions on commercial use, redistribution, and derivative works. Some AI tools use dual licensing or have separate terms for enterprise customers that differ from the open-source license.
- Check community signals — Look at the project's issue tracker, discussion forums, and social media presence. A healthy community actively reports bugs, contributes fixes, and discusses security concerns openly. Low community engagement may indicate limited peer review of the codebase.
Common Safety Concerns with Example Openclaw
When evaluating whether Example Openclaw is safe, consider these category-specific risks:
Understand how Example Openclaw processes, stores, and transmits your data. Review the tool's privacy policy and data retention practices, especially for sensitive or proprietary information.
Check Example Openclaw's dependency tree for known vulnerabilities. Tools with outdated or unmaintained dependencies pose a higher security risk.
Regularly check for updates to Example Openclaw. Security patches and bug fixes are only effective if you're running the latest version.
If Example Openclaw connects to external APIs or services, each integration point is a potential attack surface. Audit all third-party connections, verify that data shared with external services is minimized, and ensure that integration credentials are rotated regularly.
Verify that Example Openclaw's license is compatible with your intended use case. Some AI tools have restrictive licenses that limit commercial use, redistribution, or derivative works. Using Example Openclaw in violation of its license can expose your organization to legal liability.
Example Openclaw and the EU AI Act
Example Openclaw is classified as Minimal Risk under the EU AI Act. This is the lowest risk category, meaning it faces minimal regulatory requirements. However, transparency obligations still apply.
Nerq's compliance assessment covers 52 jurisdictions worldwide. For organizations deploying AI tools in regulated environments, understanding these classifications is essential for legal compliance.
Best Practices for Using Example Openclaw Safely
Whether you're an individual developer or an enterprise team, these practices will help you get the most from Example Openclaw while minimizing risk:
Periodically review how Example Openclaw is used in your workflow. Check for unexpected behavior, permissions drift, and compliance with your security policies.
Ensure Example Openclaw and all its dependencies are running the latest stable versions to benefit from security patches.
Grant Example Openclaw only the minimum permissions it needs to function. Avoid granting admin or root access.
Subscribe to Example Openclaw's security advisories and vulnerability disclosures. Use Nerq's API to get automated trust score updates.
Create and maintain a clear policy for how Example Openclaw is used within your organization, including data handling guidelines and acceptable use cases.
When Should You Avoid Example Openclaw?
Even promising tools aren't right for every situation. Consider avoiding Example Openclaw in these scenarios:
- Production environments handling sensitive customer data
- Regulated industries (healthcare, finance, government) without additional compliance review
- Mission-critical systems where downtime has significant business impact
For each scenario, evaluate whether Example Openclaw's trust score of 61.1/100 meets your organization's risk tolerance. We recommend running a manual security assessment alongside the automated Nerq score.
How Example Openclaw Compares to Industry Standards
Nerq indexes over 6 million software tools, apps, and packages across dozens of categories. Among other tools, the average Trust Score is 62/100. Example Openclaw's score of 61.1/100 is near the category average of 62/100.
This places Example Openclaw in line with the typical other tool tool. It meets baseline expectations but does not distinguish itself from peers on trust metrics.
Industry benchmarks matter because they contextualize a tool's safety profile. A score that looks moderate in isolation may actually represent strong performance within a challenging category — or vice versa. Nerq's category-relative analysis helps teams make informed decisions by showing not just absolute quality, but how a tool ranks against its direct peers.
Trust Score History
Nerq continuously monitors Example Openclaw and recalculates its Trust Score as new data becomes available. Our scoring engine ingests real-time signals from source repositories, vulnerability databases (NVD, OSV.dev), package registries, and community metrics. When a new CVE is published, a major release ships, or maintenance patterns change, Example Openclaw's score is updated within 24 hours.
Historical trust trends reveal whether a tool is improving, stable, or declining over time. A tool that consistently maintains or improves its score demonstrates ongoing commitment to security and quality. Conversely, a downward trend may signal reduced maintenance, growing technical debt, or unresolved vulnerabilities. To track Example Openclaw's score over time, use the Nerq API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=example-openclaw&include=history
Nerq retains trust score snapshots at regular intervals, enabling trend analysis across weeks and months. Enterprise users can access detailed historical reports showing how each dimension — security, maintenance, documentation, compliance, and community — has evolved independently, providing granular visibility into which aspects of Example Openclaw are strengthening or weakening over time.
Example Openclaw vs Alternatives
In the other category, Example Openclaw scores 61.1/100. There are higher-scoring alternatives available. For a detailed comparison, see:
- Example Openclaw vs cs-video-courses — Trust Score: 69.3/100
- Example Openclaw vs awesome-scalability — Trust Score: 71.8/100
- Example Openclaw vs superpowers — Trust Score: 71.8/100
Key Takeaways
- Example Openclaw has a Trust Score of 61.1/100 (C) and is not yet Nerq Verified.
- Example Openclaw shows moderate trust signals. Conduct thorough due diligence before deploying to production environments.
- Among other tools, Example Openclaw scores near the category average of 62/100, suggesting room for improvement relative to peers.
- Always verify safety independently — use Nerq's Preflight API for automated, up-to-date trust checks before integration.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Example Openclaw safe to use?
What is Example Openclaw's trust score?
What are safer alternatives to Example Openclaw?
How often is Example Openclaw's safety score updated?
Can I use Example Openclaw in a regulated environment?
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.