Is Feishu Opencode Bridge Safe?
Use Feishu Opencode Bridge with some caution. Feishu Opencode Bridge is a software tool with a Nerq Trust Score of 63.1/100 (C), based on 5 independent data dimensions. It is below the recommended threshold of 70. Security: 0/100. Maintenance: 1/100. Popularity: 0/100. Data sourced from multiple public sources including package registries, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev, and OpenSSF Scorecard. Last updated: 2026-03-25. Machine-readable data (JSON).
Is Feishu Opencode Bridge safe?
CAUTION — Feishu Opencode Bridge has a Nerq Trust Score of 63.1/100 (C). It has moderate trust signals but shows some areas of concern that warrant attention. Suitable for development use — review security and maintenance signals before production deployment.
Trust Score Breakdown
Key Findings
Details
| Author | HNGM-HP |
| Category | communication |
| Stars | 8 |
| Source | https://github.com/HNGM-HP/feishu-opencode-bridge |
| Frameworks | anthropic |
| Protocols | rest |
Regulatory Compliance
| EU AI Act Risk Class | MINIMAL |
| Compliance Score | 82/100 |
| Jurisdictions | Assessed across 52 jurisdictions |
Popular Alternatives in communication
Feishu Opencode Bridge Across Platforms
Same developer/company in other registries:
What Is Feishu Opencode Bridge?
Feishu Opencode Bridge is a software tool in the communication category: Bridges Feishu chat with local OpenCode for automated task execution and interactive communication.. It has 8 GitHub stars. Nerq Trust Score: 63/100 (C).
Nerq independently analyzes every software tool, app, and extension across multiple trust signals including security vulnerabilities, maintenance activity, license compliance, and community adoption.
How Nerq Assesses Feishu Opencode Bridge's Safety
Nerq's Trust Score is calculated from 13+ independent signals aggregated into five dimensions. Here is how Feishu Opencode Bridge performs in each:
- Security (0/100): Feishu Opencode Bridge's security posture is poor. This score factors in known CVEs, dependency vulnerabilities, security policy presence, and code signing practices.
- Maintenance (1/100): Feishu Opencode Bridge is potentially abandoned. We track commit frequency, release cadence, issue response times, and PR merge rates.
- Documentation (1/100): Documentation quality is insufficient. This includes README completeness, API documentation, usage examples, and contribution guidelines.
- Compliance (82/100): Feishu Opencode Bridge is broadly compliant. Assessed against regulations in 52 jurisdictions including the EU AI Act, CCPA, and GDPR.
- Community (0/100): Community adoption is limited. Based on GitHub stars, forks, download counts, and ecosystem integrations.
The overall Trust Score of 63.1/100 (C) reflects the weighted combination of these signals. This is below the Nerq Verified threshold of 70. We recommend additional due diligence before production deployment.
Who Should Use Feishu Opencode Bridge?
Feishu Opencode Bridge is designed for:
- Developers and teams working with communication tools
- Organizations evaluating AI tools for their stack
- Researchers exploring AI capabilities in this domain
Risk guidance: Feishu Opencode Bridge is suitable for development and testing environments. Before production deployment, conduct a thorough review of its security posture, review the specific trust signals above, and consider whether a higher-scored alternative meets your requirements.
How to Verify Feishu Opencode Bridge's Safety Yourself
While Nerq provides automated trust analysis, we recommend these additional steps before adopting any software tool:
- Check the source code — Review the repository's security policy, open issues, and recent commits for signs of active maintenance.
- Scan dependencies — Use tools like
npm audit,pip-audit, orsnykto check for known vulnerabilities in Feishu Opencode Bridge's dependency tree. - Review permissions — Understand what access Feishu Opencode Bridge requires. Software tools should follow the principle of least privilege.
- Test in isolation — Run Feishu Opencode Bridge in a sandboxed environment before granting access to production data or systems.
- Monitor continuously — Use Nerq's API to set up automated trust checks:
GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=feishu-opencode-bridge - Review the license — Confirm that Feishu Opencode Bridge's license is compatible with your intended use case. Pay attention to restrictions on commercial use, redistribution, and derivative works. Some AI tools use dual licensing or have separate terms for enterprise customers that differ from the open-source license.
- Check community signals — Look at the project's issue tracker, discussion forums, and social media presence. A healthy community actively reports bugs, contributes fixes, and discusses security concerns openly. Low community engagement may indicate limited peer review of the codebase.
Common Safety Concerns with Feishu Opencode Bridge
When evaluating whether Feishu Opencode Bridge is safe, consider these category-specific risks:
Understand how Feishu Opencode Bridge processes, stores, and transmits your data. Review the tool's privacy policy and data retention practices, especially for sensitive or proprietary information.
Check Feishu Opencode Bridge's dependency tree for known vulnerabilities. Tools with outdated or unmaintained dependencies pose a higher security risk.
Regularly check for updates to Feishu Opencode Bridge. Security patches and bug fixes are only effective if you're running the latest version.
If Feishu Opencode Bridge connects to external APIs or services, each integration point is a potential attack surface. Audit all third-party connections, verify that data shared with external services is minimized, and ensure that integration credentials are rotated regularly.
Verify that Feishu Opencode Bridge's license is compatible with your intended use case. Some AI tools have restrictive licenses that limit commercial use, redistribution, or derivative works. Using Feishu Opencode Bridge in violation of its license can expose your organization to legal liability.
Feishu Opencode Bridge and the EU AI Act
Feishu Opencode Bridge is classified as Minimal Risk under the EU AI Act. This is the lowest risk category, meaning it faces minimal regulatory requirements. However, transparency obligations still apply.
Nerq's compliance assessment covers 52 jurisdictions worldwide. For organizations deploying AI tools in regulated environments, understanding these classifications is essential for legal compliance.
Best Practices for Using Feishu Opencode Bridge Safely
Whether you're an individual developer or an enterprise team, these practices will help you get the most from Feishu Opencode Bridge while minimizing risk:
Periodically review how Feishu Opencode Bridge is used in your workflow. Check for unexpected behavior, permissions drift, and compliance with your security policies.
Ensure Feishu Opencode Bridge and all its dependencies are running the latest stable versions to benefit from security patches.
Grant Feishu Opencode Bridge only the minimum permissions it needs to function. Avoid granting admin or root access.
Subscribe to Feishu Opencode Bridge's security advisories and vulnerability disclosures. Use Nerq's API to get automated trust score updates.
Create and maintain a clear policy for how Feishu Opencode Bridge is used within your organization, including data handling guidelines and acceptable use cases.
When Should You Avoid Feishu Opencode Bridge?
Even promising tools aren't right for every situation. Consider avoiding Feishu Opencode Bridge in these scenarios:
- Production environments handling sensitive customer data
- Regulated industries (healthcare, finance, government) without additional compliance review
- Mission-critical systems where downtime has significant business impact
For each scenario, evaluate whether Feishu Opencode Bridge's trust score of 63.1/100 meets your organization's risk tolerance. We recommend running a manual security assessment alongside the automated Nerq score.
How Feishu Opencode Bridge Compares to Industry Standards
Nerq indexes over 6 million software tools, apps, and packages across dozens of categories. Among communication tools, the average Trust Score is 62/100. Feishu Opencode Bridge's score of 63.1/100 is above the category average of 62/100.
This positions Feishu Opencode Bridge favorably among communication tools. While it outperforms the average, there is still room for improvement in certain trust dimensions.
Industry benchmarks matter because they contextualize a tool's safety profile. A score that looks moderate in isolation may actually represent strong performance within a challenging category — or vice versa. Nerq's category-relative analysis helps teams make informed decisions by showing not just absolute quality, but how a tool ranks against its direct peers.
Trust Score History
Nerq continuously monitors Feishu Opencode Bridge and recalculates its Trust Score as new data becomes available. Our scoring engine ingests real-time signals from source repositories, vulnerability databases (NVD, OSV.dev), package registries, and community metrics. When a new CVE is published, a major release ships, or maintenance patterns change, Feishu Opencode Bridge's score is updated within 24 hours.
Historical trust trends reveal whether a tool is improving, stable, or declining over time. A tool that consistently maintains or improves its score demonstrates ongoing commitment to security and quality. Conversely, a downward trend may signal reduced maintenance, growing technical debt, or unresolved vulnerabilities. To track Feishu Opencode Bridge's score over time, use the Nerq API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=feishu-opencode-bridge&include=history
Nerq retains trust score snapshots at regular intervals, enabling trend analysis across weeks and months. Enterprise users can access detailed historical reports showing how each dimension — security, maintenance, documentation, compliance, and community — has evolved independently, providing granular visibility into which aspects of Feishu Opencode Bridge are strengthening or weakening over time.
Feishu Opencode Bridge vs Alternatives
In the communication category, Feishu Opencode Bridge scores 63.1/100. There are higher-scoring alternatives available. For a detailed comparison, see:
- Feishu Opencode Bridge vs Real-Time-Voice-Cloning — Trust Score: 71.3/100
- Feishu Opencode Bridge vs ChatGPT — Trust Score: 73.8/100
- Feishu Opencode Bridge vs jan — Trust Score: 73.8/100
Key Takeaways
- Feishu Opencode Bridge has a Trust Score of 63.1/100 (C) and is not yet Nerq Verified.
- Feishu Opencode Bridge shows moderate trust signals. Conduct thorough due diligence before deploying to production environments.
- Among communication tools, Feishu Opencode Bridge scores above the category average of 62/100, demonstrating above-average reliability.
- Always verify safety independently — use Nerq's Preflight API for automated, up-to-date trust checks before integration.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Feishu Opencode Bridge safe to use?
What is Feishu Opencode Bridge's trust score?
What are safer alternatives to Feishu Opencode Bridge?
How often is Feishu Opencode Bridge's safety score updated?
Can I use Feishu Opencode Bridge in a regulated environment?
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.