Is Google Messages Openclaw Skill Safe?

Google Messages Openclaw Skill — Nerq Trust Score 68.7/100 (C grade). Score based on 5 independent trust signals.

Google Messages Openclaw Skill is a software tool with a Nerq Trust Score of 68.7/100 (C), based on 5 independent data dimensions. Security: 0/100. Maintenance: 1/100. Popularity: 0/100. Data sourced from multiple public sources including package registries, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev, and OpenSSF Scorecard. Last updated: n/a. Machine-readable data (JSON).

Is Google Messages Openclaw Skill safe?

Trust Score Breakdown — Google Messages Openclaw Skill has a Nerq Trust Score of 68.7/100 (C). Measured across 5 independent trust signals.

Security Analysis → Google Messages Openclaw Skill Privacy Report →

What is Google Messages Openclaw Skill's trust score?

Google Messages Openclaw Skill has a Nerq Trust Score of 68.7/100, earning a C grade. This score is based on 5 independently measured dimensions including security, maintenance, and community adoption.

Security
0
Compliance
96
Maintenance
1
Documentation
1
Popularity
0

What are the key security findings for Google Messages Openclaw Skill?

Google Messages Openclaw Skill's strongest signal is compliance at 96/100. No known vulnerabilities have been detected.

Security score: 0/100 (weak)
Maintenance: 1/100 — low maintenance activity
Compliance: 96/100 — covers 49 of 52 jurisdictions
Documentation: 1/100 — limited documentation
Popularity: 0/100 — community adoption

What is Google Messages Openclaw Skill and who maintains it?

Authorkesslerio
CategoryCommunication
Sourcehttps://github.com/kesslerio/google-messages-openclaw-skill
Protocolsrest

Regulatory Compliance

EU AI Act Risk ClassMINIMAL
Compliance Score96/100
JurisdictionsAssessed across 52 jurisdictions

Popular Alternatives in communication

lencx/ChatGPT
57.2/100 · C
github
janhq/jan
57.2/100 · C
github
2noise/ChatTTS
55.0/100 · C
github
chatboxai/chatbox
55.9/100 · C
github
LAION-AI/Open-Assistant
67.9/100 · B-
github

Google Messages Openclaw Skill Across Platforms

Same developer/company in other registries:

attio-mcp
63/100 · npm

What Is Google Messages Openclaw Skill?

Google Messages Openclaw Skill is a software tool in the communication category: Automates SMS/RCS messaging via Google Messages web interface.. Nerq Trust Score: 69/100 (C).

Nerq independently analyzes every software tool, app, and extension across multiple trust signals including security vulnerabilities, maintenance activity, license compliance, and community adoption.

How Nerq Assesses Google Messages Openclaw Skill's Safety

Nerq's Trust Score is calculated from 13+ independent signals aggregated into five dimensions. Here is how Google Messages Openclaw Skill performs in each:

The overall Trust Score of 68.7/100 (C) is the weighted combination of these measured signals. It is a measurement, not a pass/fail or suitability judgment — weigh the individual signals against your own requirements.

Who Typically Evaluates Google Messages Openclaw Skill?

Google Messages Openclaw Skill is commonly evaluated by:

How to read the signals: Google Messages Openclaw Skill's measured signals (security 0/100, maintenance 1/100, documentation 1/100, community 0/100) are shown above. These are measurements, not a suitability judgment — weigh each signal against the requirements of your own use case and risk tolerance.

How to Verify Google Messages Openclaw Skill's Safety Yourself

While Nerq provides automated trust analysis, we recommend these additional steps before adopting any software tool:

  1. Check the source code — Review the repository's security policy, open issues, and recent commits for signs of active maintenance.
  2. Scan dependencies — Use tools like npm audit, pip-audit, or snyk to check for known vulnerabilities in Google Messages Openclaw Skill's dependency tree.
  3. Review permissions — Understand what access Google Messages Openclaw Skill requires. Software tools should follow the principle of least privilege.
  4. Test in isolation — Run Google Messages Openclaw Skill in a sandboxed environment before granting access to production data or systems.
  5. Monitor continuously — Use Nerq's API to set up automated trust checks: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=google-messages-openclaw-skill
  6. Review the license — Confirm that Google Messages Openclaw Skill's license is compatible with your intended use case. Pay attention to restrictions on commercial use, redistribution, and derivative works. Some AI tools use dual licensing or have separate terms for enterprise customers that differ from the open-source license.
  7. Check community signals — Look at the project's issue tracker, discussion forums, and social media presence. A healthy community actively reports bugs, contributes fixes, and discusses security concerns openly. Low community engagement may indicate limited peer review of the codebase.

Common Safety Concerns with Google Messages Openclaw Skill

When evaluating whether Google Messages Openclaw Skill is safe, consider these category-specific risks:

Data handling

Understand how Google Messages Openclaw Skill processes, stores, and transmits your data. Review the tool's privacy policy and data retention practices, especially for sensitive or proprietary information.

Dependency security

Check Google Messages Openclaw Skill's dependency tree for known vulnerabilities. Tools with outdated or unmaintained dependencies pose a higher security risk.

Update frequency

Regularly check for updates to Google Messages Openclaw Skill. Security patches and bug fixes are only effective if you're running the latest version.

Third-party integrations

If Google Messages Openclaw Skill connects to external APIs or services, each integration point is a potential attack surface. Audit all third-party connections, verify that data shared with external services is minimized, and ensure that integration credentials are rotated regularly.

License and IP compliance

Verify that Google Messages Openclaw Skill's license is compatible with your intended use case. Some AI tools have restrictive licenses that limit commercial use, redistribution, or derivative works. Using Google Messages Openclaw Skill in violation of its license can expose your organization to legal liability.

Google Messages Openclaw Skill and the EU AI Act

Google Messages Openclaw Skill is classified as Minimal Risk under the EU AI Act. This is the lowest risk category, meaning it faces minimal regulatory requirements. However, transparency obligations still apply.

Nerq's compliance assessment covers 52 jurisdictions worldwide. For organizations deploying AI tools in regulated environments, understanding these classifications is essential for legal compliance.

Best Practices for Using Google Messages Openclaw Skill Safely

Whether you're an individual developer or an enterprise team, these practices will help you get the most from Google Messages Openclaw Skill while minimizing risk:

Conduct regular audits

Periodically review how Google Messages Openclaw Skill is used in your workflow. Check for unexpected behavior, permissions drift, and compliance with your security policies.

Keep dependencies updated

Ensure Google Messages Openclaw Skill and all its dependencies are running the latest stable versions to benefit from security patches.

Follow least privilege

Grant Google Messages Openclaw Skill only the minimum permissions it needs to function. Avoid granting admin or root access.

Monitor for security advisories

Subscribe to Google Messages Openclaw Skill's security advisories and vulnerability disclosures. Use Nerq's API to get automated trust score updates.

Document usage policies

Create and maintain a clear policy for how Google Messages Openclaw Skill is used within your organization, including data handling guidelines and acceptable use cases.

Situations That Warrant Independent Review of Google Messages Openclaw Skill

Nerq's signals are one input. In the following situations, evaluate Google Messages Openclaw Skill's measured signals against your own requirements before making a decision:

For each situation, compare Google Messages Openclaw Skill's measured trust score of 68.7/100 and its individual signals against your organization's own criteria. Nerq does not assert whether Google Messages Openclaw Skill is suitable for any particular use.

How Google Messages Openclaw Skill Compares to Industry Standards

Nerq indexes over 6 million software tools, apps, and packages across dozens of categories. Among communication tools, the average Trust Score is 62/100. Google Messages Openclaw Skill's score of 68.7/100 is above the category average of 62/100.

This positions Google Messages Openclaw Skill favorably among communication tools. While it outperforms the average, there is still room for improvement in certain trust dimensions.

Industry benchmarks matter because they contextualize a tool's safety profile. A score that looks moderate in isolation may actually represent strong performance within a challenging category — or vice versa. Nerq's category-relative analysis helps teams make informed decisions by showing not just absolute quality, but how a tool ranks against its direct peers.

Trust Score History

Nerq continuously monitors Google Messages Openclaw Skill and recalculates its Trust Score as new data becomes available. Our scoring engine ingests real-time signals from source repositories, vulnerability databases (NVD, OSV.dev), package registries, and community metrics. When a new CVE is published, a major release ships, or maintenance patterns change, Google Messages Openclaw Skill's score is updated within 24 hours.

Historical trust trends reveal whether a tool is improving, stable, or declining over time. A tool that consistently maintains or improves its score demonstrates ongoing commitment to security and quality. Conversely, a downward trend may signal reduced maintenance, growing technical debt, or unresolved vulnerabilities. To track Google Messages Openclaw Skill's score over time, use the Nerq API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=google-messages-openclaw-skill&include=history

Nerq retains trust score snapshots at regular intervals, enabling trend analysis across weeks and months. Enterprise users can access detailed historical reports showing how each dimension — security, maintenance, documentation, compliance, and community — has evolved independently, providing granular visibility into which aspects of Google Messages Openclaw Skill are strengthening or weakening over time.

Google Messages Openclaw Skill vs Alternatives

In the communication category, Google Messages Openclaw Skill scores 68.7/100. There are higher-scoring alternatives available. For a detailed comparison, see:

Key Takeaways

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Google Messages Openclaw Skill Safe?
google-messages-openclaw-skill with a Nerq Trust Score of 68.7/100 (C). Strongest signal: compliance (96/100). Score based on Security (0/100), Maintenance (1/100), Popularity (0/100), Documentation (1/100).
What is Google Messages Openclaw Skill's trust score?
google-messages-openclaw-skill: 68.7/100 (C). Score based on Security (0/100), Maintenance (1/100), Popularity (0/100), Documentation (1/100). Compliance: 96/100. Scores update as new data becomes available. API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=google-messages-openclaw-skill
What are safer alternatives to Google Messages Openclaw Skill?
In the Communication category, higher-rated alternatives include lencx/ChatGPT (57/100), janhq/jan (57/100), 2noise/ChatTTS (55/100). google-messages-openclaw-skill scores 68.7/100.
How often is Google Messages Openclaw Skill's safety score updated?
Nerq recomputes Google Messages Openclaw Skill's trust score as new data becomes available. Current: 68.7/100 (C). API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=google-messages-openclaw-skill
Can I use Google Messages Openclaw Skill in a regulated environment?
Google Messages Openclaw Skill: 68.7/100 (C). Compliance: 49 of 52 jurisdictions. EU AI Act compliant. Evaluate against your own regulatory requirements.
API: /v1/preflight Trust Badge API Docs

See Also

Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated measurements based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements, verdicts, or guarantees of suitability. Always evaluate the signals against your own requirements.

We use cookies for analytics and caching. Privacy