Is Gprofiler Performance Studio Safe?
Gprofiler Performance Studio — Nerq Trust Score 77.8/100 (B grade). Based on analysis of 5 trust dimensions, it is generally safe but has some concerns. Last updated: 2026-04-04.
Yes, Gprofiler Performance Studio is safe to use. Gprofiler Performance Studio is a software tool with a Nerq Trust Score of 77.8/100 (B), based on 5 independent data dimensions. It is recommended for use. Security: 0/100. Maintenance: 1/100. Popularity: 1/100. Data sourced from multiple public sources including package registries, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev, and OpenSSF Scorecard. Last updated: 2026-04-04. Machine-readable data (JSON).
Is Gprofiler Performance Studio safe?
YES — Gprofiler Performance Studio has a Nerq Trust Score of 77.8/100 (B). It meets Nerq's trust threshold with strong signals across security, maintenance, and community adoption. Recommended for use — review the full report below for specific considerations.
What is Gprofiler Performance Studio's trust score?
Gprofiler Performance Studio has a Nerq Trust Score of 77.8/100, earning a B grade. This score is based on 5 independently measured dimensions including security, maintenance, and community adoption.
What are the key security findings for Gprofiler Performance Studio?
Gprofiler Performance Studio's strongest signal is compliance at 100/100. No known vulnerabilities have been detected. It meets the Nerq Verified threshold of 70+.
What is Gprofiler Performance Studio and who maintains it?
| Author | intel |
| Category | devops |
| Stars | 192 |
| Source | https://github.com/intel/gprofiler-performance-studio |
| Protocols | rest |
Regulatory Compliance
| EU AI Act Risk Class | Not assessed |
| Compliance Score | 100/100 |
| Jurisdictions | Assessed across 52 jurisdictions |
Popular Alternatives in devops
Gprofiler Performance Studio Across Platforms
Same developer/company in other registries:
What Is Gprofiler Performance Studio?
Gprofiler Performance Studio is a DevOps tool: An open-source, continuous profiler for identifying runtime inefficiencies.. It has 192 GitHub stars. Nerq Trust Score: 78/100 (B).
Nerq independently analyzes every software tool, app, and extension across multiple trust signals including security vulnerabilities, maintenance activity, license compliance, and community adoption.
How Nerq Assesses Gprofiler Performance Studio's Safety
Nerq's Trust Score is calculated from 13+ independent signals aggregated into five dimensions. Here is how Gprofiler Performance Studio performs in each:
- Security (0/100): Gprofiler Performance Studio's security posture is poor. This score factors in known CVEs, dependency vulnerabilities, security policy presence, and code signing practices.
- Maintenance (1/100): Gprofiler Performance Studio is potentially abandoned. We track commit frequency, release cadence, issue response times, and PR merge rates.
- Documentation (1/100): Documentation quality is insufficient. This includes README completeness, API documentation, usage examples, and contribution guidelines.
- Compliance (100/100): Gprofiler Performance Studio is broadly compliant. Assessed against regulations in 52 jurisdictions including the EU AI Act, CCPA, and GDPR.
- Community (1/100): Community adoption is limited. Based on GitHub stars, forks, download counts, and ecosystem integrations.
The overall Trust Score of 77.8/100 (B) reflects the weighted combination of these signals. This exceeds the Nerq Verified threshold of 70, indicating the tool meets our standards for production use.
Who Should Use Gprofiler Performance Studio?
Gprofiler Performance Studio is designed for:
- Developers and teams working with devops tools
- Organizations evaluating AI tools for their stack
- Researchers exploring AI capabilities in this domain
Risk guidance: Gprofiler Performance Studio meets the minimum threshold for production use, but we recommend monitoring for security advisories and keeping dependencies up to date. Consider implementing additional guardrails for sensitive workloads.
How to Verify Gprofiler Performance Studio's Safety Yourself
While Nerq provides automated trust analysis, we recommend these additional steps before adopting any software tool:
- Check the source code — Review the repository's security policy, open issues, and recent commits for signs of active maintenance.
- Scan dependencies — Use tools like
npm audit,pip-audit, orsnykto check for known vulnerabilities in Gprofiler Performance Studio's dependency tree. - Review permissions — Understand what access Gprofiler Performance Studio requires. Software tools should follow the principle of least privilege.
- Test in isolation — Run Gprofiler Performance Studio in a sandboxed environment before granting access to production data or systems.
- Monitor continuously — Use Nerq's API to set up automated trust checks:
GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=gprofiler-performance-studio - Review the license — Confirm that Gprofiler Performance Studio's license is compatible with your intended use case. Pay attention to restrictions on commercial use, redistribution, and derivative works. Some AI tools use dual licensing or have separate terms for enterprise customers that differ from the open-source license.
- Check community signals — Look at the project's issue tracker, discussion forums, and social media presence. A healthy community actively reports bugs, contributes fixes, and discusses security concerns openly. Low community engagement may indicate limited peer review of the codebase.
Common Safety Concerns with Gprofiler Performance Studio
When evaluating whether Gprofiler Performance Studio is safe, consider these category-specific risks:
Understand how Gprofiler Performance Studio processes, stores, and transmits your data. Review the tool's privacy policy and data retention practices, especially for sensitive or proprietary information.
Check Gprofiler Performance Studio's dependency tree for known vulnerabilities. Tools with outdated or unmaintained dependencies pose a higher security risk.
Regularly check for updates to Gprofiler Performance Studio. Security patches and bug fixes are only effective if you're running the latest version.
If Gprofiler Performance Studio connects to external APIs or services, each integration point is a potential attack surface. Audit all third-party connections, verify that data shared with external services is minimized, and ensure that integration credentials are rotated regularly.
Verify that Gprofiler Performance Studio's license is compatible with your intended use case. Some AI tools have restrictive licenses that limit commercial use, redistribution, or derivative works. Using Gprofiler Performance Studio in violation of its license can expose your organization to legal liability.
Best Practices for Using Gprofiler Performance Studio Safely
Whether you're an individual developer or an enterprise team, these practices will help you get the most from Gprofiler Performance Studio while minimizing risk:
Periodically review how Gprofiler Performance Studio is used in your workflow. Check for unexpected behavior, permissions drift, and compliance with your security policies.
Ensure Gprofiler Performance Studio and all its dependencies are running the latest stable versions to benefit from security patches.
Grant Gprofiler Performance Studio only the minimum permissions it needs to function. Avoid granting admin or root access.
Subscribe to Gprofiler Performance Studio's security advisories and vulnerability disclosures. Use Nerq's API to get automated trust score updates.
Create and maintain a clear policy for how Gprofiler Performance Studio is used within your organization, including data handling guidelines and acceptable use cases.
When Should You Avoid Gprofiler Performance Studio?
Even well-trusted tools aren't right for every situation. Consider avoiding Gprofiler Performance Studio in these scenarios:
- Scenarios where Gprofiler Performance Studio's specific capabilities exceed your actual needs — simpler tools may be safer
- Air-gapped environments where the tool cannot receive security updates
- Projects with strict regulatory requirements that haven't been explicitly validated
For each scenario, evaluate whether Gprofiler Performance Studio's trust score of 77.8/100 meets your organization's risk tolerance. The Nerq Verified status indicates general production readiness, but sector-specific requirements may apply.
How Gprofiler Performance Studio Compares to Industry Standards
Nerq indexes over 6 million software tools, apps, and packages across dozens of categories. Among DevOps tools, the average Trust Score is 63/100. Gprofiler Performance Studio's score of 77.8/100 is significantly above the category average of 63/100.
This places Gprofiler Performance Studio in the top tier of DevOps tools that Nerq tracks. Tools scoring this far above average typically demonstrate mature security practices, consistent release cadence, and broad community adoption.
Industry benchmarks matter because they contextualize a tool's safety profile. A score that looks moderate in isolation may actually represent strong performance within a challenging category — or vice versa. Nerq's category-relative analysis helps teams make informed decisions by showing not just absolute quality, but how a tool ranks against its direct peers.
Trust Score History
Nerq continuously monitors Gprofiler Performance Studio and recalculates its Trust Score as new data becomes available. Our scoring engine ingests real-time signals from source repositories, vulnerability databases (NVD, OSV.dev), package registries, and community metrics. When a new CVE is published, a major release ships, or maintenance patterns change, Gprofiler Performance Studio's score is updated within 24 hours.
Historical trust trends reveal whether a tool is improving, stable, or declining over time. A tool that consistently maintains or improves its score demonstrates ongoing commitment to security and quality. Conversely, a downward trend may signal reduced maintenance, growing technical debt, or unresolved vulnerabilities. To track Gprofiler Performance Studio's score over time, use the Nerq API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=gprofiler-performance-studio&include=history
Nerq retains trust score snapshots at regular intervals, enabling trend analysis across weeks and months. Enterprise users can access detailed historical reports showing how each dimension — security, maintenance, documentation, compliance, and community — has evolved independently, providing granular visibility into which aspects of Gprofiler Performance Studio are strengthening or weakening over time.
Gprofiler Performance Studio vs Alternatives
In the devops category, Gprofiler Performance Studio scores 77.8/100. It ranks among the top tools in its category. For a detailed comparison, see:
- Gprofiler Performance Studio vs ansible — Trust Score: 84.3/100
- Gprofiler Performance Studio vs Flowise — Trust Score: 76.9/100
- Gprofiler Performance Studio vs learn-claude-code — Trust Score: 81.5/100
Key Takeaways
- Gprofiler Performance Studio has a Trust Score of 77.8/100 (B) and is Nerq Verified.
- Gprofiler Performance Studio meets the minimum threshold for production deployment, though monitoring and additional guardrails are recommended.
- Among DevOps tools, Gprofiler Performance Studio scores significantly above the category average of 63/100, demonstrating above-average reliability.
- Always verify safety independently — use Nerq's Preflight API for automated, up-to-date trust checks before integration.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Gprofiler Performance Studio safe to use?
What is Gprofiler Performance Studio's trust score?
What are safer alternatives to Gprofiler Performance Studio?
How often is Gprofiler Performance Studio's safety score updated?
Can I use Gprofiler Performance Studio in a regulated environment?
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.