Is Inbox Zero Safe?

Inbox Zero — Nerq Trust Score 56.8/100 (D grade). Score based on 5 independent trust signals.

Inbox Zero is a software tool with a Nerq Trust Score of 56.8/100 (D), based on 5 independent data dimensions. Security: 0/100. Maintenance: 0/100. Popularity: 0/100. Data sourced from multiple public sources including package registries, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev, and OpenSSF Scorecard. Last updated: n/a. Machine-readable data (JSON).

Is Inbox Zero safe?

Trust Score Breakdown — Inbox Zero has a Nerq Trust Score of 56.8/100 (D). Measured across 5 independent trust signals.

Security Analysis → Inbox Zero Privacy Report →

What is Inbox Zero's trust score?

Inbox Zero has a Nerq Trust Score of 56.8/100, earning a D grade. This score is based on 5 independently measured dimensions including security, maintenance, and community adoption.

Security
0
Compliance
87
Maintenance
0
Documentation
0
Popularity
0

What are the key security findings for Inbox Zero?

Inbox Zero's strongest signal is compliance at 87/100. No known vulnerabilities have been detected.

Security score: 0/100 (weak)
Maintenance: 0/100 — low maintenance activity
Compliance: 87/100 — covers 45 of 52 jurisdictions
Documentation: 0/100 — limited documentation
Popularity: 0/100 — community adoption

What is Inbox Zero and who maintains it?

Authorelie222
CategoryUncategorized
Sourcehttps://hub.docker.com/r/elie222/inbox-zero
Protocolsdocker

Regulatory Compliance

EU AI Act Risk ClassNot assessed
Compliance Score87/100
JurisdictionsAssessed across 52 jurisdictions

Inbox Zero Across Platforms

Same developer/company in other registries:

fsai
61/100 · npm
@alephmatic/kirimase
59/100 · npm
@inbox-zero/cli
54/100 · npm
@elie222/neo4jd3
46/100 · npm

What Is Inbox Zero?

Inbox Zero is a software tool in the uncategorized category: Inbox Zero - AI email assistant for Gmail and Outlook to reach inbox zero fast. Nerq Trust Score: 57/100 (D).

Nerq independently analyzes every software tool, app, and extension across multiple trust signals including security vulnerabilities, maintenance activity, license compliance, and community adoption.

How Nerq Assesses Inbox Zero's Safety

Nerq's Trust Score is calculated from 13+ independent signals aggregated into five dimensions. Here is how Inbox Zero performs in each:

The overall Trust Score of 56.8/100 (D) is the weighted combination of these measured signals. It is a measurement, not a pass/fail or suitability judgment — weigh the individual signals against your own requirements.

Who Typically Evaluates Inbox Zero?

Inbox Zero is commonly evaluated by:

How to read the signals: Inbox Zero's measured signals (security 0/100, maintenance 0/100, documentation 0/100, community 0/100) are shown above. These are measurements, not a suitability judgment — weigh each signal against the requirements of your own use case and risk tolerance.

How to Verify Inbox Zero's Safety Yourself

While Nerq provides automated trust analysis, we recommend these additional steps before adopting any software tool:

  1. Check the source code — Review the repository security policy, open issues, and recent commits for signs of active maintenance.
  2. Scan dependencies — Use tools like npm audit, pip-audit, or snyk to check for known vulnerabilities in Inbox Zero's dependency tree.
  3. Review permissions — Understand what access Inbox Zero requires. Software tools should follow the principle of least privilege.
  4. Test in isolation — Run Inbox Zero in a sandboxed environment before granting access to production data or systems.
  5. Monitor continuously — Use Nerq's API to set up automated trust checks: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=inbox-zero
  6. Review the license — Confirm that Inbox Zero's license is compatible with your intended use case. Pay attention to restrictions on commercial use, redistribution, and derivative works. Some AI tools use dual licensing or have separate terms for enterprise customers that differ from the open-source license.
  7. Check community signals — Look at the project's issue tracker, discussion forums, and social media presence. A healthy community actively reports bugs, contributes fixes, and discusses security concerns openly. Low community engagement may indicate limited peer review of the codebase.

Common Safety Concerns with Inbox Zero

When evaluating whether Inbox Zero is safe, consider these category-specific risks:

Data handling

Understand how Inbox Zero processes, stores, and transmits your data. Review the tool's privacy policy and data retention practices, especially for sensitive or proprietary information.

Dependency security

Check Inbox Zero's dependency tree for known vulnerabilities. Tools with outdated or unmaintained dependencies pose a higher security risk.

Update frequency

Regularly check for updates to Inbox Zero. Security patches and bug fixes are only effective if you're running the latest version.

Third-party integrations

If Inbox Zero connects to external APIs or services, each integration point is a potential attack surface. Audit all third-party connections, verify that data shared with external services is minimized, and ensure that integration credentials are rotated regularly.

License and IP compliance

Verify that Inbox Zero's license is compatible with your intended use case. Some AI tools have restrictive licenses that limit commercial use, redistribution, or derivative works. Using Inbox Zero in violation of its license can expose your organization to legal liability.

Best Practices for Using Inbox Zero Safely

Whether you're an individual developer or an enterprise team, these practices will help you get the most from Inbox Zero while minimizing risk:

Conduct regular audits

Periodically review how Inbox Zero is used in your workflow. Check for unexpected behavior, permissions drift, and compliance with your security policies.

Keep dependencies updated

Ensure Inbox Zero and all its dependencies are running the latest stable versions to benefit from security patches.

Follow least privilege

Grant Inbox Zero only the minimum permissions it needs to function. Avoid granting admin or root access.

Monitor for security advisories

Subscribe to Inbox Zero's security advisories and vulnerability disclosures. Use Nerq's API to get automated trust score updates.

Document usage policies

Create and maintain a clear policy for how Inbox Zero is used within your organization, including data handling guidelines and acceptable use cases.

Situations That Warrant Independent Review of Inbox Zero

Nerq's signals are one input. In the following situations, evaluate Inbox Zero's measured signals against your own requirements before making a decision:

For each situation, compare Inbox Zero's measured trust score of 56.8/100 and its individual signals against your organization's own criteria. Nerq does not assert whether Inbox Zero is suitable for any particular use.

How Inbox Zero Compares to Industry Standards

Nerq indexes over 6 million software tools, apps, and packages across dozens of categories. Among uncategorized tools, the average Trust Score is 62/100. Inbox Zero's score of 56.8/100 is near the category average of 62/100.

This places Inbox Zero in line with the typical uncategorized tool tool. It meets baseline expectations but does not distinguish itself from peers on trust metrics.

Industry benchmarks matter because they contextualize a tool's safety profile. A score that looks moderate in isolation may actually represent strong performance within a challenging category — or vice versa. Nerq's category-relative analysis helps teams make informed decisions by showing not just absolute quality, but how a tool ranks against its direct peers.

Trust Score History

Nerq continuously monitors Inbox Zero and recalculates its Trust Score as new data becomes available. Our scoring engine ingests real-time signals from source repositories, vulnerability databases (NVD, OSV.dev), package registries, and community metrics. When a new CVE is published, a major release ships, or maintenance patterns change, Inbox Zero's score is updated within 24 hours.

Historical trust trends reveal whether a tool is improving, stable, or declining over time. A tool that consistently maintains or improves its score demonstrates ongoing commitment to security and quality. Conversely, a downward trend may signal reduced maintenance, growing technical debt, or unresolved vulnerabilities. To track Inbox Zero's score over time, use the Nerq API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=inbox-zero&include=history

Nerq retains trust score snapshots at regular intervals, enabling trend analysis across weeks and months. Enterprise users can access detailed historical reports showing how each dimension — security, maintenance, documentation, compliance, and community — has evolved independently, providing granular visibility into which aspects of Inbox Zero are strengthening or weakening over time.

Key Takeaways

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Inbox Zero Safe?
inbox-zero with a Nerq Trust Score of 56.8/100 (D). Strongest signal: compliance (87/100). Score based on Security (0/100), Maintenance (0/100), Popularity (0/100), Documentation (0/100).
What is Inbox Zero's trust score?
inbox-zero: 56.8/100 (D). Score based on Security (0/100), Maintenance (0/100), Popularity (0/100), Documentation (0/100). Compliance: 87/100. Scores update as new data becomes available. API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=inbox-zero
What are safer alternatives to Inbox Zero?
In the Uncategorized category, more software tools are being analyzed — check back soon. inbox-zero scores 56.8/100.
How often is Inbox Zero's safety score updated?
Nerq recomputes Inbox Zero's trust score as new data becomes available. Current: 56.8/100 (D). API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=inbox-zero
Can I use Inbox Zero in a regulated environment?
Inbox Zero: 56.8/100 (D). Compliance: 45 of 52 jurisdictions. Evaluate against your own regulatory requirements.
API: /v1/preflight Trust Badge API Docs

See Also

Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated measurements based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements, verdicts, or guarantees of suitability. Always evaluate the signals against your own requirements.

We use cookies for analytics and caching. Privacy