Is Near Wallet Manager Safe?
Near Wallet Manager — Nerq Trust Score 40.4/100 (E grade). Based on analysis of 5 trust dimensions, it is has notable safety concerns. Last updated: 2026-05-20.
Exercise caution with Near Wallet Manager. Near Wallet Manager is a software tool with a Nerq Trust Score of 40.4/100 (E). Below the recommended threshold of 70. Data sourced from multiple public sources including package registries, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev, and OpenSSF Scorecard. Last updated: 2026-05-20. Machine-readable data (JSON).
Is Near Wallet Manager safe?
NO — USE WITH CAUTION — Near Wallet Manager has a Nerq Trust Score of 40.4/100 (E). It has below-average trust signals with significant gaps in security, maintenance, or documentation. Not recommended for production use without thorough manual review and additional security measures.
What is Near Wallet Manager's trust score?
Near Wallet Manager has a Nerq Trust Score of 40.4/100, earning a E grade. This score is based on 5 independently measured dimensions including security, maintenance, and community adoption.
What are the key security findings for Near Wallet Manager?
Near Wallet Manager's strongest signal is overall trust at 40.4/100. No known vulnerabilities have been detected. It has not yet reached the Nerq Verified threshold of 70+.
What is Near Wallet Manager and who maintains it?
| Author | https://github.com/mastrophot/near-mcp-wallet-manager |
| Category | Uncategorized |
| Source | https://github.com/mastrophot/near-mcp-wallet-manager |
What Is Near Wallet Manager?
Near Wallet Manager is a software tool in the uncategorized category: MCP server for NEAR wallet creation, balance checks, and transaction signing.. Nerq Trust Score: 40/100 (E).
Nerq independently analyzes every software tool, app, and extension across multiple trust signals including security vulnerabilities, maintenance activity, license compliance, and community adoption.
How Nerq Assesses Near Wallet Manager's Safety
Nerq evaluates every software tool across 13+ independent trust signals drawn from public sources including GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev, OpenSSF Scorecard, and package registries. These signals are grouped into five core dimensions: Security (known CVEs, dependency vulnerabilities, security policies), Maintenance (commit frequency, release cadence, issue response times), Documentation (README quality, API docs, examples), Compliance (license, regulatory alignment across 52 jurisdictions), and Community (stars, forks, downloads, ecosystem integrations).
Near Wallet Manager receives an overall Trust Score of 40.4/100 (E), which Nerq considers low. This is below the Nerq Verified threshold of 70. We recommend additional due diligence before production deployment.
Nerq updates trust scores continuously as new data becomes available. To get the latest assessment, query the API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=io.github.mastrophot/near-wallet-manager
Each dimension is weighted according to its importance for the tool's category. For example, Security and Maintenance carry higher weight for tools that handle sensitive data or execute code, while Community and Documentation are weighted more heavily for developer-facing libraries and frameworks. This ensures that Near Wallet Manager's score reflects the risks most relevant to its actual usage patterns. The final score is a weighted average across all five dimensions, normalized to a 0-100 scale with letter grades from A (highest) to F (lowest).
Who Should Use Near Wallet Manager?
Near Wallet Manager is designed for:
- Developers and teams working with uncategorized tools
- Organizations evaluating AI tools for their stack
- Researchers exploring AI capabilities in this domain
Risk guidance: We recommend caution with Near Wallet Manager. The low trust score suggests potential risks in security, maintenance, or community support. Consider using a more established alternative for any production or sensitive workload.
How to Verify Near Wallet Manager's Safety Yourself
While Nerq provides automated trust analysis, we recommend these additional steps before adopting any software tool:
- Check the source code — Review the repository security policy, open issues, and recent commits for signs of active maintenance.
- Scan dependencies — Use tools like
npm audit,pip-audit, orsnykto check for known vulnerabilities in Near Wallet Manager's dependency tree. - Review permissions — Understand what access Near Wallet Manager requires. Software tools should follow the principle of least privilege.
- Test in isolation — Run Near Wallet Manager in a sandboxed environment before granting access to production data or systems.
- Monitor continuously — Use Nerq's API to set up automated trust checks:
GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=io.github.mastrophot/near-wallet-manager - Review the license — Confirm that Near Wallet Manager's license is compatible with your intended use case. Pay attention to restrictions on commercial use, redistribution, and derivative works. Some AI tools use dual licensing or have separate terms for enterprise customers that differ from the open-source license.
- Check community signals — Look at the project's issue tracker, discussion forums, and social media presence. A healthy community actively reports bugs, contributes fixes, and discusses security concerns openly. Low community engagement may indicate limited peer review of the codebase.
Common Safety Concerns with Near Wallet Manager
When evaluating whether Near Wallet Manager is safe, consider these category-specific risks:
Understand how Near Wallet Manager processes, stores, and transmits your data. Review the tool's privacy policy and data retention practices, especially for sensitive or proprietary information.
Check Near Wallet Manager's dependency tree for known vulnerabilities. Tools with outdated or unmaintained dependencies pose a higher security risk.
Regularly check for updates to Near Wallet Manager. Security patches and bug fixes are only effective if you're running the latest version.
If Near Wallet Manager connects to external APIs or services, each integration point is a potential attack surface. Audit all third-party connections, verify that data shared with external services is minimized, and ensure that integration credentials are rotated regularly.
Verify that Near Wallet Manager's license is compatible with your intended use case. Some AI tools have restrictive licenses that limit commercial use, redistribution, or derivative works. Using Near Wallet Manager in violation of its license can expose your organization to legal liability.
Best Practices for Using Near Wallet Manager Safely
Whether you're an individual developer or an enterprise team, these practices will help you get the most from Near Wallet Manager while minimizing risk:
Periodically review how Near Wallet Manager is used in your workflow. Check for unexpected behavior, permissions drift, and compliance with your security policies.
Ensure Near Wallet Manager and all its dependencies are running the latest stable versions to benefit from security patches.
Grant Near Wallet Manager only the minimum permissions it needs to function. Avoid granting admin or root access.
Subscribe to Near Wallet Manager's security advisories and vulnerability disclosures. Use Nerq's API to get automated trust score updates.
Create and maintain a clear policy for how Near Wallet Manager is used within your organization, including data handling guidelines and acceptable use cases.
When Should You Avoid Near Wallet Manager?
Even promising tools aren't right for every situation. Consider avoiding Near Wallet Manager in these scenarios:
- Production environments handling sensitive customer data
- Regulated industries (healthcare, finance, government) without additional compliance review
- Mission-critical systems where downtime has significant business impact
For each scenario, evaluate whether Near Wallet Manager's trust score of 40.4/100 meets your organization's risk tolerance. We recommend running a manual security assessment alongside the automated Nerq score.
How Near Wallet Manager Compares to Industry Standards
Nerq indexes over 6 million software tools, apps, and packages across dozens of categories. Among uncategorized tools, the average Trust Score is 62/100. Near Wallet Manager's score of 40.4/100 is below the category average of 62/100.
This suggests that Near Wallet Manager trails behind many comparable uncategorized tools. Organizations with strict security requirements should evaluate whether higher-scoring alternatives better meet their needs.
Industry benchmarks matter because they contextualize a tool's safety profile. A score that looks moderate in isolation may actually represent strong performance within a challenging category — or vice versa. Nerq's category-relative analysis helps teams make informed decisions by showing not just absolute quality, but how a tool ranks against its direct peers.
Trust Score History
Nerq continuously monitors Near Wallet Manager and recalculates its Trust Score as new data becomes available. Our scoring engine ingests real-time signals from source repositories, vulnerability databases (NVD, OSV.dev), package registries, and community metrics. When a new CVE is published, a major release ships, or maintenance patterns change, Near Wallet Manager's score is updated within 24 hours.
Historical trust trends reveal whether a tool is improving, stable, or declining over time. A tool that consistently maintains or improves its score demonstrates ongoing commitment to security and quality. Conversely, a downward trend may signal reduced maintenance, growing technical debt, or unresolved vulnerabilities. To track Near Wallet Manager's score over time, use the Nerq API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=io.github.mastrophot/near-wallet-manager&include=history
Nerq retains trust score snapshots at regular intervals, enabling trend analysis across weeks and months. Enterprise users can access detailed historical reports showing how each dimension — security, maintenance, documentation, compliance, and community — has evolved independently, providing granular visibility into which aspects of Near Wallet Manager are strengthening or weakening over time.
Key Takeaways
- Near Wallet Manager has a Trust Score of 40.4/100 (E) and is not yet Nerq Verified.
- Near Wallet Manager has significant trust gaps. Consider higher-rated alternatives unless specific requirements mandate its use.
- Among uncategorized tools, Near Wallet Manager scores below the category average of 62/100, suggesting room for improvement relative to peers.
- Always verify safety independently — use Nerq's Preflight API for automated, up-to-date trust checks before integration.
What data does Near Wallet Manager collect?
Privacy assessment for Near Wallet Manager is not yet available. See our methodology for how Nerq measures privacy, or the public privacy review for any community-contributed notes.
Is Near Wallet Manager secure?
Security score: under assessment. Review security practices and consider alternatives with higher security scores for sensitive use cases.
Nerq monitors this entity against NVD, OSV.dev, and registry-specific vulnerability databases for ongoing security assessment.
Full analysis: Near Wallet Manager Security Report
How we calculated this score
Near Wallet Manager's trust score of 40.4/100 (E) is computed from multiple public sources including package registries, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev, and OpenSSF Scorecard. The score reflects 0 independent dimensions: . Each dimension is weighted equally to produce the composite trust score.
Nerq analyzes over 7.5 million entities across 26 registries using the same methodology, enabling direct cross-entity comparison. Scores are updated continuously as new data becomes available.
This page was last reviewed on May 20, 2026. Data version: 1.0.
Full methodology documentation · Machine-readable data (JSON API)
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Near Wallet Manager Safe?
What is Near Wallet Manager's trust score?
What are safer alternatives to Near Wallet Manager?
How often is Near Wallet Manager's safety score updated?
Can I use Near Wallet Manager in a regulated environment?
See Also
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.