Is Ivory Flower Safe?

Ivory Flower — Nerq Trust Score 38.3/100 (E grade). Based on analysis of 5 trust dimensions, it is has significant safety risks. Last updated: 2026-04-24.

Exercise caution with Ivory Flower. Ivory Flower is a software tool with a Nerq Trust Score of 38.3/100 (E). Below the recommended threshold of 70. Data sourced from multiple public sources including package registries, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev, and OpenSSF Scorecard. Last updated: 2026-04-24. Machine-readable data (JSON).

Is Ivory Flower safe?

NO — USE WITH CAUTION — Ivory Flower has a Nerq Trust Score of 38.3/100 (E). It has below-average trust signals with significant gaps in security, maintenance, or documentation. Not recommended for production use without thorough manual review and additional security measures.

Security Analysis → Ivory Flower Privacy Report →

What is Ivory Flower's trust score?

Ivory Flower has a Nerq Trust Score of 38.3/100, earning a E grade. This score is based on 5 independently measured dimensions including security, maintenance, and community adoption.

Overall Trust
38.3

What are the key security findings for Ivory Flower?

Ivory Flower's strongest signal is overall trust at 38.3/100. No known vulnerabilities have been detected. It has not yet reached the Nerq Verified threshold of 70+.

Composite trust score: 38.3/100 across all available signals

What is Ivory Flower and who maintains it?

Author0x8de8f4ab5403cd2182146068d820e6c378829af8
CategoryUncategorized
Sourcehttps://8004scan.io/agents/ivory-flower

What Is Ivory Flower?

Ivory Flower is a software tool in the uncategorized category: A crypto flower dancing in Web3. ID: 1769795703379-2zx93j. Nerq Trust Score: 38/100 (E).

Nerq independently analyzes every software tool, app, and extension across multiple trust signals including security vulnerabilities, maintenance activity, license compliance, and community adoption.

How Nerq Assesses Ivory Flower's Safety

Nerq evaluates every software tool across 13+ independent trust signals drawn from public sources including GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev, OpenSSF Scorecard, and package registries. These signals are grouped into five core dimensions: Security (known CVEs, dependency vulnerabilities, security policies), Maintenance (commit frequency, release cadence, issue response times), Documentation (README quality, API docs, examples), Compliance (license, regulatory alignment across 52 jurisdictions), and Community (stars, forks, downloads, ecosystem integrations).

Ivory Flower receives an overall Trust Score of 38.3/100 (E), which Nerq considers low. This is below the Nerq Verified threshold of 70. We recommend additional due diligence before production deployment.

Nerq updates trust scores continuously as new data becomes available. To get the latest assessment, query the API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=Ivory Flower

Each dimension is weighted according to its importance for the tool's category. For example, Security and Maintenance carry higher weight for tools that handle sensitive data or execute code, while Community and Documentation are weighted more heavily for developer-facing libraries and frameworks. This ensures that Ivory Flower's score reflects the risks most relevant to its actual usage patterns. The final score is a weighted average across all five dimensions, normalized to a 0-100 scale with letter grades from A (highest) to F (lowest).

Who Should Use Ivory Flower?

Ivory Flower is designed for:

Risk guidance: We recommend caution with Ivory Flower. The low trust score suggests potential risks in security, maintenance, or community support. Consider using a more established alternative for any production or sensitive workload.

How to Verify Ivory Flower's Safety Yourself

While Nerq provides automated trust analysis, we recommend these additional steps before adopting any software tool:

  1. Check the source code — Review the repository security policy, open issues, and recent commits for signs of active maintenance.
  2. Scan dependencies — Use tools like npm audit, pip-audit, or snyk to check for known vulnerabilities in Ivory Flower's dependency tree.
  3. Review permissions — Understand what access Ivory Flower requires. Software tools should follow the principle of least privilege.
  4. Test in isolation — Run Ivory Flower in a sandboxed environment before granting access to production data or systems.
  5. Monitor continuously — Use Nerq's API to set up automated trust checks: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=Ivory Flower
  6. Review the license — Confirm that Ivory Flower's license is compatible with your intended use case. Pay attention to restrictions on commercial use, redistribution, and derivative works. Some AI tools use dual licensing or have separate terms for enterprise customers that differ from the open-source license.
  7. Check community signals — Look at the project's issue tracker, discussion forums, and social media presence. A healthy community actively reports bugs, contributes fixes, and discusses security concerns openly. Low community engagement may indicate limited peer review of the codebase.

Common Safety Concerns with Ivory Flower

When evaluating whether Ivory Flower is safe, consider these category-specific risks:

Data handling

Understand how Ivory Flower processes, stores, and transmits your data. Review the tool's privacy policy and data retention practices, especially for sensitive or proprietary information.

Dependency security

Check Ivory Flower's dependency tree for known vulnerabilities. Tools with outdated or unmaintained dependencies pose a higher security risk.

Update frequency

Regularly check for updates to Ivory Flower. Security patches and bug fixes are only effective if you're running the latest version.

Third-party integrations

If Ivory Flower connects to external APIs or services, each integration point is a potential attack surface. Audit all third-party connections, verify that data shared with external services is minimized, and ensure that integration credentials are rotated regularly.

License and IP compliance

Verify that Ivory Flower's license is compatible with your intended use case. Some AI tools have restrictive licenses that limit commercial use, redistribution, or derivative works. Using Ivory Flower in violation of its license can expose your organization to legal liability.

Best Practices for Using Ivory Flower Safely

Whether you're an individual developer or an enterprise team, these practices will help you get the most from Ivory Flower while minimizing risk:

Conduct regular audits

Periodically review how Ivory Flower is used in your workflow. Check for unexpected behavior, permissions drift, and compliance with your security policies.

Keep dependencies updated

Ensure Ivory Flower and all its dependencies are running the latest stable versions to benefit from security patches.

Follow least privilege

Grant Ivory Flower only the minimum permissions it needs to function. Avoid granting admin or root access.

Monitor for security advisories

Subscribe to Ivory Flower's security advisories and vulnerability disclosures. Use Nerq's API to get automated trust score updates.

Document usage policies

Create and maintain a clear policy for how Ivory Flower is used within your organization, including data handling guidelines and acceptable use cases.

When Should You Avoid Ivory Flower?

Even promising tools aren't right for every situation. Consider avoiding Ivory Flower in these scenarios:

For each scenario, evaluate whether Ivory Flower's trust score of 38.3/100 meets your organization's risk tolerance. We recommend running a manual security assessment alongside the automated Nerq score.

How Ivory Flower Compares to Industry Standards

Nerq indexes over 6 million software tools, apps, and packages across dozens of categories. Among uncategorized tools, the average Trust Score is 62/100. Ivory Flower's score of 38.3/100 is below the category average of 62/100.

This suggests that Ivory Flower trails behind many comparable uncategorized tools. Organizations with strict security requirements should evaluate whether higher-scoring alternatives better meet their needs.

Industry benchmarks matter because they contextualize a tool's safety profile. A score that looks moderate in isolation may actually represent strong performance within a challenging category — or vice versa. Nerq's category-relative analysis helps teams make informed decisions by showing not just absolute quality, but how a tool ranks against its direct peers.

Trust Score History

Nerq continuously monitors Ivory Flower and recalculates its Trust Score as new data becomes available. Our scoring engine ingests real-time signals from source repositories, vulnerability databases (NVD, OSV.dev), package registries, and community metrics. When a new CVE is published, a major release ships, or maintenance patterns change, Ivory Flower's score is updated within 24 hours.

Historical trust trends reveal whether a tool is improving, stable, or declining over time. A tool that consistently maintains or improves its score demonstrates ongoing commitment to security and quality. Conversely, a downward trend may signal reduced maintenance, growing technical debt, or unresolved vulnerabilities. To track Ivory Flower's score over time, use the Nerq API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=Ivory Flower&include=history

Nerq retains trust score snapshots at regular intervals, enabling trend analysis across weeks and months. Enterprise users can access detailed historical reports showing how each dimension — security, maintenance, documentation, compliance, and community — has evolved independently, providing granular visibility into which aspects of Ivory Flower are strengthening or weakening over time.

Key Takeaways

What data does Ivory Flower collect?

Privacy assessment for Ivory Flower is not yet available. See our methodology for how Nerq measures privacy, or the public privacy review for any community-contributed notes.

Is Ivory Flower secure?

Security score: under assessment. Review security practices and consider alternatives with higher security scores for sensitive use cases.

Nerq monitors this entity against NVD, OSV.dev, and registry-specific vulnerability databases for ongoing security assessment.

Full analysis: Ivory Flower Security Report

How we calculated this score

Ivory Flower's trust score of 38.3/100 (E) is computed from multiple public sources including package registries, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev, and OpenSSF Scorecard. The score reflects 0 independent dimensions: . Each dimension is weighted equally to produce the composite trust score.

Nerq analyzes over 7.5 million entities across 26 registries using the same methodology, enabling direct cross-entity comparison. Scores are updated continuously as new data becomes available.

This page was last reviewed on April 24, 2026. Data version: 1.0.

Full methodology documentation · Machine-readable data (JSON API)

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Ivory Flower Safe?
Exercise caution. Ivory Flower with a Nerq Trust Score of 38.3/100 (E). Strongest signal: overall trust (38.3/100). Score based on multiple trust dimensions.
What is Ivory Flower's trust score?
Ivory Flower: 38.3/100 (E). Score based on multiple trust dimensions. Scores update as new data becomes available. API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=Ivory Flower
What are safer alternatives to Ivory Flower?
In the Uncategorized category, more software tools are being analyzed — check back soon. Ivory Flower scores 38.3/100.
How often is Ivory Flower's safety score updated?
Nerq continuously monitors Ivory Flower and updates its trust score as new data becomes available. Current: 38.3/100 (E), last verified 2026-04-24. API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=Ivory Flower
Can I use Ivory Flower in a regulated environment?
Ivory Flower has not reached the Nerq Verified threshold of 70. Additional due diligence is recommended.
API: /v1/preflight Trust Badge API Docs

See Also

Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.

We use cookies for analytics and caching. Privacy