Is Linked Api Safe?

Linked Api — Nerq Trust Score 44.7/100 (E grade). Score based on 3 independent trust signals.

Linked Api is a software tool with a Nerq Trust Score of 44.7/100 (E), based on 3 independent data dimensions. Maintenance: 0/100. Popularity: 0/100. Data sourced from multiple public sources including package registries, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev, and OpenSSF Scorecard. Last updated: n/a. Machine-readable data (JSON).

Is Linked Api safe?

Trust Score Breakdown — Linked Api has a Nerq Trust Score of 44.7/100 (E). Measured across 3 independent trust signals.

Security Analysis → Linked Api Privacy Report →

What is Linked Api's trust score?

Linked Api has a Nerq Trust Score of 44.7/100, earning a E grade. This score is based on 3 independently measured dimensions including security, maintenance, and community adoption.

Maintenance
0
Documentation
0
Popularity
0

What are the key security findings for Linked Api?

Linked Api's strongest signal is maintenance at 0/100. No known vulnerabilities have been detected.

Maintenance: 0/100 — low maintenance activity
Documentation: 0/100 — limited documentation
Popularity: 0/100 — 44 stars on pulsemcp

What is Linked Api and who maintains it?

Authorhttps://github.com/linked-api/linkedapi-mcp
CategoryMarketing
Stars44
Sourcehttps://github.com/linked-api/linkedapi-mcp

Popular Alternatives in marketing

sansan0/TrendRadar
66.8/100 · B-
github
srbhr/Resume-Matcher
61.9/100 · C
github
coreyhaines31/marketingskills
67.2/100 · C
github
RayVentura/ShortGPT
58.2/100 · D
github
vynect/venom
69.6/100 · B-
github

What Is Linked Api?

Linked Api is a software tool in the marketing category: AI assistant for managing and analyzing LinkedIn accounts.. It has 44 GitHub stars. Nerq Trust Score: 45/100 (E).

Nerq independently analyzes every software tool, app, and extension across multiple trust signals including security vulnerabilities, maintenance activity, license compliance, and community adoption.

How Nerq Assesses Linked Api's Safety

Nerq's Trust Score is calculated from 13+ independent signals aggregated into five dimensions. Here is how Linked Api performs in each:

The overall Trust Score of 44.7/100 (E) is the weighted combination of these measured signals. It is a measurement, not a pass/fail or suitability judgment — weigh the individual signals against your own requirements.

Who Typically Evaluates Linked Api?

Linked Api is commonly evaluated by:

How to read the signals: Linked Api's measured signals (maintenance 0/100, documentation 0/100, community 0/100) are shown above. These are measurements, not a suitability judgment — weigh each signal against the requirements of your own use case and risk tolerance.

How to Verify Linked Api's Safety Yourself

While Nerq provides automated trust analysis, we recommend these additional steps before adopting any software tool:

  1. Check the source code — Review the repository security policy, open issues, and recent commits for signs of active maintenance.
  2. Scan dependencies — Use tools like npm audit, pip-audit, or snyk to check for known vulnerabilities in Linked Api's dependency tree.
  3. Review permissions — Understand what access Linked Api requires. Software tools should follow the principle of least privilege.
  4. Test in isolation — Run Linked Api in a sandboxed environment before granting access to production data or systems.
  5. Monitor continuously — Use Nerq's API to set up automated trust checks: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=Linked API
  6. Review the license — Confirm that Linked Api's license is compatible with your intended use case. Pay attention to restrictions on commercial use, redistribution, and derivative works. Some AI tools use dual licensing or have separate terms for enterprise customers that differ from the open-source license.
  7. Check community signals — Look at the project's issue tracker, discussion forums, and social media presence. A healthy community actively reports bugs, contributes fixes, and discusses security concerns openly. Low community engagement may indicate limited peer review of the codebase.

Common Safety Concerns with Linked Api

When evaluating whether Linked Api is safe, consider these category-specific risks:

Data handling

Understand how Linked Api processes, stores, and transmits your data. Review the tool's privacy policy and data retention practices, especially for sensitive or proprietary information.

Dependency security

Check Linked Api's dependency tree for known vulnerabilities. Tools with outdated or unmaintained dependencies pose a higher security risk.

Update frequency

Regularly check for updates to Linked Api. Security patches and bug fixes are only effective if you're running the latest version.

Third-party integrations

If Linked Api connects to external APIs or services, each integration point is a potential attack surface. Audit all third-party connections, verify that data shared with external services is minimized, and ensure that integration credentials are rotated regularly.

License and IP compliance

Verify that Linked Api's license is compatible with your intended use case. Some AI tools have restrictive licenses that limit commercial use, redistribution, or derivative works. Using Linked Api in violation of its license can expose your organization to legal liability.

Best Practices for Using Linked Api Safely

Whether you're an individual developer or an enterprise team, these practices will help you get the most from Linked Api while minimizing risk:

Conduct regular audits

Periodically review how Linked Api is used in your workflow. Check for unexpected behavior, permissions drift, and compliance with your security policies.

Keep dependencies updated

Ensure Linked Api and all its dependencies are running the latest stable versions to benefit from security patches.

Follow least privilege

Grant Linked Api only the minimum permissions it needs to function. Avoid granting admin or root access.

Monitor for security advisories

Subscribe to Linked Api's security advisories and vulnerability disclosures. Use Nerq's API to get automated trust score updates.

Document usage policies

Create and maintain a clear policy for how Linked Api is used within your organization, including data handling guidelines and acceptable use cases.

Situations That Warrant Independent Review of Linked Api

Nerq's signals are one input. In the following situations, evaluate Linked Api's measured signals against your own requirements before making a decision:

For each situation, compare Linked Api's measured trust score of 44.7/100 and its individual signals against your organization's own criteria. Nerq does not assert whether Linked Api is suitable for any particular use.

How Linked Api Compares to Industry Standards

Nerq indexes over 6 million software tools, apps, and packages across dozens of categories. Among marketing tools, the average Trust Score is 62/100. Linked Api's score of 44.7/100 is below the category average of 62/100.

This suggests that Linked Api trails behind many comparable marketing tools. Organizations with strict security requirements should evaluate whether higher-scoring alternatives better meet their needs.

Industry benchmarks matter because they contextualize a tool's safety profile. A score that looks moderate in isolation may actually represent strong performance within a challenging category — or vice versa. Nerq's category-relative analysis helps teams make informed decisions by showing not just absolute quality, but how a tool ranks against its direct peers.

Trust Score History

Nerq continuously monitors Linked Api and recalculates its Trust Score as new data becomes available. Our scoring engine ingests real-time signals from source repositories, vulnerability databases (NVD, OSV.dev), package registries, and community metrics. When a new CVE is published, a major release ships, or maintenance patterns change, Linked Api's score is updated within 24 hours.

Historical trust trends reveal whether a tool is improving, stable, or declining over time. A tool that consistently maintains or improves its score demonstrates ongoing commitment to security and quality. Conversely, a downward trend may signal reduced maintenance, growing technical debt, or unresolved vulnerabilities. To track Linked Api's score over time, use the Nerq API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=Linked API&include=history

Nerq retains trust score snapshots at regular intervals, enabling trend analysis across weeks and months. Enterprise users can access detailed historical reports showing how each dimension — security, maintenance, documentation, compliance, and community — has evolved independently, providing granular visibility into which aspects of Linked Api are strengthening or weakening over time.

Linked Api vs Alternatives

In the marketing category, Linked Api scores 44.7/100. There are higher-scoring alternatives available. For a detailed comparison, see:

Key Takeaways

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Linked Api Safe?
Linked API with a Nerq Trust Score of 44.7/100 (E). Strongest signal: maintenance (0/100). Score based on Maintenance (0/100), Popularity (0/100), Documentation (0/100).
What is Linked Api's trust score?
Linked API: 44.7/100 (E). Score based on Maintenance (0/100), Popularity (0/100), Documentation (0/100). Scores update as new data becomes available. API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=Linked API
What are safer alternatives to Linked Api?
In the Marketing category, higher-rated alternatives include sansan0/TrendRadar (67/100), srbhr/Resume-Matcher (62/100), coreyhaines31/marketingskills (67/100). Linked API scores 44.7/100.
How often is Linked Api's safety score updated?
Nerq recomputes Linked Api's trust score as new data becomes available. Current: 44.7/100 (E). API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=Linked API
Can I use Linked Api in a regulated environment?
Linked Api: 44.7/100 (E). Compliance signals are shown in the breakdown above. Evaluate against your own regulatory requirements.
API: /v1/preflight Trust Badge API Docs

See Also

Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated measurements based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements, verdicts, or guarantees of suitability. Always evaluate the signals against your own requirements.

We use cookies for analytics and caching. Privacy