Is Lzo Safe?
Lzo — Nerq Trust Score 59.2/100 (C grade). Score based on 2 independent trust signals. Last analyzed: 2026-03-22
Lzo is a Homebrew formula with a Nerq Trust Score of 59.2/100 (C), based on 3 independent data dimensions. Last analyzed: 2026-03-22 Security: 90/100. Popularity: 60/100. Data sourced from Homebrew formulae database and GitHub (homebrew-core). Last updated: 2026-03-22. Machine-readable data (JSON).
Is Lzo safe?
Trust Score Breakdown — Lzo has a Nerq Trust Score of 59.2/100 (C). Measured across 2 independent trust signals (as of 2026-03-22).
What is Lzo's trust score?
Lzo has a Nerq Trust Score of 59.2/100, earning a C grade. This score is based on 2 independently measured dimensions including security, maintenance, and community adoption.
What are the key security findings for Lzo?
Lzo's strongest signal is security at 90/100. No known vulnerabilities have been detected.
What is Lzo and who maintains it?
| Author | Unknown |
| Category | Homebrew |
| Source | N/A |
Similar Homebrew by Trust Score
Safety Guide: Lzo
What is Lzo?
Lzo is a Homebrew formula — Real-time data compression library.
How to Verify Safety
Homebrew formulas are community-reviewed. Check formulae.brew.sh.
You can also check the trust score via API: GET /v1/preflight?target=lzo
Key Safety Concerns for Homebrew formula
When evaluating any Homebrew formula, watch for: source build integrity, dependency chain.
Measured Signals
Lzo has a Nerq Trust Score of 59/100 (C). This score is a composite of automated measurements of security, maintenance, community, and quality signals.
Key Takeaways
- Lzo has a Trust Score of 59/100 (C).
- The score is a measured composite — it is not a suitability judgment. Evaluate the individual signals against your own requirements.
- Query the current measured values via the Nerq API.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Lzo Safe?
What is Lzo's trust score?
What are safer alternatives to Lzo?
Is Lzo actively maintained?
How was Lzo reviewed?
Popular in Homebrew
See Also
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated measurements based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements, verdicts, or guarantees of suitability. Always evaluate the signals against your own requirements.