Is Nono Safe?
Nono — Nerq Trust Score 67.0/100 (C grade). Score based on 5 independent trust signals.
Nono is a Rust crate with a Nerq Trust Score of 67.0/100 (C). Data sourced from crates.io registry, GitHub, NVD, and RustSec advisory database. Last updated: n/a. Machine-readable data (JSON).
Is Nono safe?
Trust Score Breakdown — Nono has a Nerq Trust Score of 67.0/100 (C). Measured across 1 independent trust signal.
What is Nono's trust score?
Nono has a Nerq Trust Score of 67.0/100, earning a C grade. This score is based on 5 independently measured dimensions including security, maintenance, and community adoption.
What are the key security findings for Nono?
Nono's strongest signal is overall trust at 67.0/100. No known vulnerabilities have been detected.
What is Nono and who maintains it?
| Author | Unknown |
| Category | Rust Crates |
| Source | N/A |
Nono Across Platforms
Same developer/company in other registries:
Similar Crates by Trust Score
Safety Guide: Nono
What is Nono?
Nono is a Rust crate — Capability-based sandboxing library using Landlock (Linux) and Seatbelt (macOS).
How to Verify Safety
Run cargo audit. Review on crates.io for activity.
You can also check the trust score via API: GET /v1/preflight?target=nono
Key Safety Concerns for Rust crate
When evaluating any Rust crate, watch for: dependency vulnerabilities, unsafe code, maintenance status.
Measured Signals
Nono has a Nerq Trust Score of 67/100 (C). This score is a composite of automated measurements of security, maintenance, community, and quality signals.
Key Takeaways
- Nono has a Trust Score of 67/100 (C).
- The score is a measured composite — it is not a suitability judgment. Evaluate the individual signals against your own requirements.
- Query the current measured values via the Nerq API.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Nono Safe?
What is Nono's trust score?
What are safer alternatives to Nono?
Does Nono have known vulnerabilities?
Does Nono use unsafe code?
Popular in Rust Crates
Browse Categories
See Also
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated measurements based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements, verdicts, or guarantees of suitability. Always evaluate the signals against your own requirements.