Is Oo0 State Safe?
Oo0 State — Nerq Trust Score 62.6/100 (C grade). Score based on 5 independent trust signals.
Oo0 State is a software tool with a Nerq Trust Score of 62.6/100 (C), based on 5 independent data dimensions. Security: 0/100. Maintenance: 1/100. Popularity: 0/100. Data sourced from multiple public sources including package registries, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev, and OpenSSF Scorecard. Last updated: n/a. Machine-readable data (JSON).
Is Oo0 State safe?
Trust Score Breakdown — Oo0 State has a Nerq Trust Score of 62.6/100 (C). Measured across 5 independent trust signals.
What is Oo0 State's trust score?
Oo0 State has a Nerq Trust Score of 62.6/100, earning a C grade. This score is based on 5 independently measured dimensions including security, maintenance, and community adoption.
What are the key security findings for Oo0 State?
Oo0 State's strongest signal is compliance at 87/100. No known vulnerabilities have been detected.
What is Oo0 State and who maintains it?
| Author | ariffazil |
| Category | Coding |
| Source | https://github.com/ariffazil/oo0-STATE |
| Frameworks | anthropic |
| Protocols | mcp · rest |
Regulatory Compliance
| EU AI Act Risk Class | MINIMAL |
| Compliance Score | 87/100 |
| Jurisdictions | Assessed across 52 jurisdictions |
Popular Alternatives in coding
What Is Oo0 State?
Oo0 State is a software tool in the coding category: oo0-STATE Trinity System with Mind, Heart, and Conscience components.. Nerq Trust Score: 63/100 (C).
Nerq independently analyzes every software tool, app, and extension across multiple trust signals including security vulnerabilities, maintenance activity, license compliance, and community adoption.
How Nerq Assesses Oo0 State's Safety
Nerq's Trust Score is calculated from 13+ independent signals aggregated into five dimensions. Here is how Oo0 State performs in each:
- Security (0/100): Oo0 State's security posture is poor. This score factors in known CVEs, dependency vulnerabilities, security policy presence, and code signing practices.
- Maintenance (1/100): Oo0 State is potentially abandoned. We track commit frequency, release cadence, issue response times, and PR merge rates.
- Documentation (1/100): Documentation quality is insufficient. This includes README completeness, API documentation, usage examples, and contribution guidelines.
- Compliance (87/100): Oo0 State is broadly compliant. Assessed against regulations in 52 jurisdictions including the EU AI Act, CCPA, and GDPR.
- Community (0/100): Community adoption is limited. Based on GitHub stars, forks, download counts, and ecosystem integrations.
The overall Trust Score of 62.6/100 (C) is the weighted combination of these measured signals. It is a measurement, not a pass/fail or suitability judgment — weigh the individual signals against your own requirements.
Who Typically Evaluates Oo0 State?
Oo0 State is commonly evaluated by:
- Developers and teams working with coding tools
- Organizations evaluating AI tools for their stack
- Researchers exploring AI capabilities in this domain
How to read the signals: Oo0 State's measured signals (security 0/100, maintenance 1/100, documentation 1/100, community 0/100) are shown above. These are measurements, not a suitability judgment — weigh each signal against the requirements of your own use case and risk tolerance.
How to Verify Oo0 State's Safety Yourself
While Nerq provides automated trust analysis, we recommend these additional steps before adopting any software tool:
- Check the source code — Review the repository's security policy, open issues, and recent commits for signs of active maintenance.
- Scan dependencies — Use tools like
npm audit,pip-audit, orsnykto check for known vulnerabilities in Oo0 State's dependency tree. - Review permissions — Understand what access Oo0 State requires. Software tools should follow the principle of least privilege.
- Test in isolation — Run Oo0 State in a sandboxed environment before granting access to production data or systems.
- Monitor continuously — Use Nerq's API to set up automated trust checks:
GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=oo0-STATE - Review the license — Confirm that Oo0 State's license is compatible with your intended use case. Pay attention to restrictions on commercial use, redistribution, and derivative works. Some AI tools use dual licensing or have separate terms for enterprise customers that differ from the open-source license.
- Check community signals — Look at the project's issue tracker, discussion forums, and social media presence. A healthy community actively reports bugs, contributes fixes, and discusses security concerns openly. Low community engagement may indicate limited peer review of the codebase.
Common Safety Concerns with Oo0 State
When evaluating whether Oo0 State is safe, consider these category-specific risks:
Understand how Oo0 State processes, stores, and transmits your data. Review the tool's privacy policy and data retention practices, especially for sensitive or proprietary information.
Check Oo0 State's dependency tree for known vulnerabilities. Tools with outdated or unmaintained dependencies pose a higher security risk.
Regularly check for updates to Oo0 State. Security patches and bug fixes are only effective if you're running the latest version.
If Oo0 State connects to external APIs or services, each integration point is a potential attack surface. Audit all third-party connections, verify that data shared with external services is minimized, and ensure that integration credentials are rotated regularly.
Verify that Oo0 State's license is compatible with your intended use case. Some AI tools have restrictive licenses that limit commercial use, redistribution, or derivative works. Using Oo0 State in violation of its license can expose your organization to legal liability.
Oo0 State and the EU AI Act
Oo0 State is classified as Minimal Risk under the EU AI Act. This is the lowest risk category, meaning it faces minimal regulatory requirements. However, transparency obligations still apply.
Nerq's compliance assessment covers 52 jurisdictions worldwide. For organizations deploying AI tools in regulated environments, understanding these classifications is essential for legal compliance.
Best Practices for Using Oo0 State Safely
Whether you're an individual developer or an enterprise team, these practices will help you get the most from Oo0 State while minimizing risk:
Periodically review how Oo0 State is used in your workflow. Check for unexpected behavior, permissions drift, and compliance with your security policies.
Ensure Oo0 State and all its dependencies are running the latest stable versions to benefit from security patches.
Grant Oo0 State only the minimum permissions it needs to function. Avoid granting admin or root access.
Subscribe to Oo0 State's security advisories and vulnerability disclosures. Use Nerq's API to get automated trust score updates.
Create and maintain a clear policy for how Oo0 State is used within your organization, including data handling guidelines and acceptable use cases.
Situations That Warrant Independent Review of Oo0 State
Nerq's signals are one input. In the following situations, evaluate Oo0 State's measured signals against your own requirements before making a decision:
- Environments handling sensitive or regulated data (healthcare, finance, government)
- Mission-critical systems where downtime has significant business impact
- Deployments with strict regulatory requirements that must be independently validated
For each situation, compare Oo0 State's measured trust score of 62.6/100 and its individual signals against your organization's own criteria. Nerq does not assert whether Oo0 State is suitable for any particular use.
How Oo0 State Compares to Industry Standards
Nerq indexes over 6 million software tools, apps, and packages across dozens of categories. Among coding tools, the average Trust Score is 62/100. Oo0 State's score of 62.6/100 is above the category average of 62/100.
This positions Oo0 State favorably among coding tools. While it outperforms the average, there is still room for improvement in certain trust dimensions.
Industry benchmarks matter because they contextualize a tool's safety profile. A score that looks moderate in isolation may actually represent strong performance within a challenging category — or vice versa. Nerq's category-relative analysis helps teams make informed decisions by showing not just absolute quality, but how a tool ranks against its direct peers.
Trust Score History
Nerq continuously monitors Oo0 State and recalculates its Trust Score as new data becomes available. Our scoring engine ingests real-time signals from source repositories, vulnerability databases (NVD, OSV.dev), package registries, and community metrics. When a new CVE is published, a major release ships, or maintenance patterns change, Oo0 State's score is updated within 24 hours.
Historical trust trends reveal whether a tool is improving, stable, or declining over time. A tool that consistently maintains or improves its score demonstrates ongoing commitment to security and quality. Conversely, a downward trend may signal reduced maintenance, growing technical debt, or unresolved vulnerabilities. To track Oo0 State's score over time, use the Nerq API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=oo0-STATE&include=history
Nerq retains trust score snapshots at regular intervals, enabling trend analysis across weeks and months. Enterprise users can access detailed historical reports showing how each dimension — security, maintenance, documentation, compliance, and community — has evolved independently, providing granular visibility into which aspects of Oo0 State are strengthening or weakening over time.
Oo0 State vs Alternatives
In the coding category, Oo0 State scores 62.6/100. There are higher-scoring alternatives available. For a detailed comparison, see:
- Oo0 State vs AutoGPT — Trust Score: 65.3/100
- Oo0 State vs ollama — Trust Score: 64.4/100
- Oo0 State vs langchain — Trust Score: 81.0/100
Key Takeaways
- Oo0 State has a measured Nerq Trust Score of 62.6/100 (C) — a composite of independent signals, not a suitability judgment.
- Among coding tools, Oo0 State scores above the category average of 62/100 (a positional measurement relative to peers).
- The individual signals — security, maintenance, documentation, compliance, community — are shown above. Weigh them against your own requirements.
- Query the current measured values via Nerq's Preflight API.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Oo0 State Safe?
What is Oo0 State's trust score?
What are safer alternatives to Oo0 State?
How often is Oo0 State's safety score updated?
Can I use Oo0 State in a regulated environment?
See Also
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated measurements based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements, verdicts, or guarantees of suitability. Always evaluate the signals against your own requirements.