Is Openclaw Astr Assistant Safe?
Openclaw Astr Assistant — Nerq Trust Score 57.2/100 (D grade). Score based on 5 independent trust signals.
Openclaw Astr Assistant is a software tool with a Nerq Trust Score of 57.2/100 (D), based on 5 independent data dimensions. Security: 0/100. Maintenance: 1/100. Popularity: 0/100. Data sourced from multiple public sources including package registries, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev, and OpenSSF Scorecard. Last updated: n/a. Machine-readable data (JSON).
Is Openclaw Astr Assistant safe?
Trust Score Breakdown — Openclaw Astr Assistant has a Nerq Trust Score of 57.2/100 (D). Measured across 5 independent trust signals.
What is Openclaw Astr Assistant's trust score?
Openclaw Astr Assistant has a Nerq Trust Score of 57.2/100, earning a D grade. This score is based on 5 independently measured dimensions including security, maintenance, and community adoption.
What are the key security findings for Openclaw Astr Assistant?
Openclaw Astr Assistant's strongest signal is compliance at 84/100. No known vulnerabilities have been detected.
What is Openclaw Astr Assistant and who maintains it?
| Author | wangyingxuan383-ai |
| Category | Devops |
| Source | https://github.com/wangyingxuan383-ai/openclaw-astr-assistant |
Regulatory Compliance
| EU AI Act Risk Class | MINIMAL |
| Compliance Score | 84/100 |
| Jurisdictions | Assessed across 52 jurisdictions |
Popular Alternatives in devops
What Is Openclaw Astr Assistant?
Openclaw Astr Assistant is a DevOps tool: OpenClaw × Astr QQ Assistant backend for running and maintaining plugins.. Nerq Trust Score: 57/100 (D).
Nerq independently analyzes every software tool, app, and extension across multiple trust signals including security vulnerabilities, maintenance activity, license compliance, and community adoption.
How Nerq Assesses Openclaw Astr Assistant's Safety
Nerq's Trust Score is calculated from 13+ independent signals aggregated into five dimensions. Here is how Openclaw Astr Assistant performs in each:
- Security (0/100): Openclaw Astr Assistant's security posture is poor. This score factors in known CVEs, dependency vulnerabilities, security policy presence, and code signing practices.
- Maintenance (1/100): Openclaw Astr Assistant is potentially abandoned. We track commit frequency, release cadence, issue response times, and PR merge rates.
- Documentation (1/100): Documentation quality is insufficient. This includes README completeness, API documentation, usage examples, and contribution guidelines.
- Compliance (84/100): Openclaw Astr Assistant is broadly compliant. Assessed against regulations in 52 jurisdictions including the EU AI Act, CCPA, and GDPR.
- Community (0/100): Community adoption is limited. Based on GitHub stars, forks, download counts, and ecosystem integrations.
The overall Trust Score of 57.2/100 (D) is the weighted combination of these measured signals. It is a measurement, not a pass/fail or suitability judgment — weigh the individual signals against your own requirements.
Who Typically Evaluates Openclaw Astr Assistant?
Openclaw Astr Assistant is commonly evaluated by:
- Developers and teams working with devops tools
- Organizations evaluating AI tools for their stack
- Researchers exploring AI capabilities in this domain
How to read the signals: Openclaw Astr Assistant's measured signals (security 0/100, maintenance 1/100, documentation 1/100, community 0/100) are shown above. These are measurements, not a suitability judgment — weigh each signal against the requirements of your own use case and risk tolerance.
How to Verify Openclaw Astr Assistant's Safety Yourself
While Nerq provides automated trust analysis, we recommend these additional steps before adopting any software tool:
- Check the source code — Review the repository's security policy, open issues, and recent commits for signs of active maintenance.
- Scan dependencies — Use tools like
npm audit,pip-audit, orsnykto check for known vulnerabilities in Openclaw Astr Assistant's dependency tree. - Review permissions — Understand what access Openclaw Astr Assistant requires. Software tools should follow the principle of least privilege.
- Test in isolation — Run Openclaw Astr Assistant in a sandboxed environment before granting access to production data or systems.
- Monitor continuously — Use Nerq's API to set up automated trust checks:
GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=openclaw-astr-assistant - Review the license — Confirm that Openclaw Astr Assistant's license is compatible with your intended use case. Pay attention to restrictions on commercial use, redistribution, and derivative works. Some AI tools use dual licensing or have separate terms for enterprise customers that differ from the open-source license.
- Check community signals — Look at the project's issue tracker, discussion forums, and social media presence. A healthy community actively reports bugs, contributes fixes, and discusses security concerns openly. Low community engagement may indicate limited peer review of the codebase.
Common Safety Concerns with Openclaw Astr Assistant
When evaluating whether Openclaw Astr Assistant is safe, consider these category-specific risks:
Understand how Openclaw Astr Assistant processes, stores, and transmits your data. Review the tool's privacy policy and data retention practices, especially for sensitive or proprietary information.
Check Openclaw Astr Assistant's dependency tree for known vulnerabilities. Tools with outdated or unmaintained dependencies pose a higher security risk.
Regularly check for updates to Openclaw Astr Assistant. Security patches and bug fixes are only effective if you're running the latest version.
If Openclaw Astr Assistant connects to external APIs or services, each integration point is a potential attack surface. Audit all third-party connections, verify that data shared with external services is minimized, and ensure that integration credentials are rotated regularly.
Verify that Openclaw Astr Assistant's license is compatible with your intended use case. Some AI tools have restrictive licenses that limit commercial use, redistribution, or derivative works. Using Openclaw Astr Assistant in violation of its license can expose your organization to legal liability.
Openclaw Astr Assistant and the EU AI Act
Openclaw Astr Assistant is classified as Minimal Risk under the EU AI Act. This is the lowest risk category, meaning it faces minimal regulatory requirements. However, transparency obligations still apply.
Nerq's compliance assessment covers 52 jurisdictions worldwide. For organizations deploying AI tools in regulated environments, understanding these classifications is essential for legal compliance.
Best Practices for Using Openclaw Astr Assistant Safely
Whether you're an individual developer or an enterprise team, these practices will help you get the most from Openclaw Astr Assistant while minimizing risk:
Periodically review how Openclaw Astr Assistant is used in your workflow. Check for unexpected behavior, permissions drift, and compliance with your security policies.
Ensure Openclaw Astr Assistant and all its dependencies are running the latest stable versions to benefit from security patches.
Grant Openclaw Astr Assistant only the minimum permissions it needs to function. Avoid granting admin or root access.
Subscribe to Openclaw Astr Assistant's security advisories and vulnerability disclosures. Use Nerq's API to get automated trust score updates.
Create and maintain a clear policy for how Openclaw Astr Assistant is used within your organization, including data handling guidelines and acceptable use cases.
Situations That Warrant Independent Review of Openclaw Astr Assistant
Nerq's signals are one input. In the following situations, evaluate Openclaw Astr Assistant's measured signals against your own requirements before making a decision:
- Environments handling sensitive or regulated data (healthcare, finance, government)
- Mission-critical systems where downtime has significant business impact
- Deployments with strict regulatory requirements that must be independently validated
For each situation, compare Openclaw Astr Assistant's measured trust score of 57.2/100 and its individual signals against your organization's own criteria. Nerq does not assert whether Openclaw Astr Assistant is suitable for any particular use.
How Openclaw Astr Assistant Compares to Industry Standards
Nerq indexes over 6 million software tools, apps, and packages across dozens of categories. Among DevOps tools, the average Trust Score is 63/100. Openclaw Astr Assistant's score of 57.2/100 is near the category average of 63/100.
This places Openclaw Astr Assistant in line with the typical DevOps tool tool. It meets baseline expectations but does not distinguish itself from peers on trust metrics.
Industry benchmarks matter because they contextualize a tool's safety profile. A score that looks moderate in isolation may actually represent strong performance within a challenging category — or vice versa. Nerq's category-relative analysis helps teams make informed decisions by showing not just absolute quality, but how a tool ranks against its direct peers.
Trust Score History
Nerq continuously monitors Openclaw Astr Assistant and recalculates its Trust Score as new data becomes available. Our scoring engine ingests real-time signals from source repositories, vulnerability databases (NVD, OSV.dev), package registries, and community metrics. When a new CVE is published, a major release ships, or maintenance patterns change, Openclaw Astr Assistant's score is updated within 24 hours.
Historical trust trends reveal whether a tool is improving, stable, or declining over time. A tool that consistently maintains or improves its score demonstrates ongoing commitment to security and quality. Conversely, a downward trend may signal reduced maintenance, growing technical debt, or unresolved vulnerabilities. To track Openclaw Astr Assistant's score over time, use the Nerq API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=openclaw-astr-assistant&include=history
Nerq retains trust score snapshots at regular intervals, enabling trend analysis across weeks and months. Enterprise users can access detailed historical reports showing how each dimension — security, maintenance, documentation, compliance, and community — has evolved independently, providing granular visibility into which aspects of Openclaw Astr Assistant are strengthening or weakening over time.
Openclaw Astr Assistant vs Alternatives
In the devops category, Openclaw Astr Assistant scores 57.2/100. There are higher-scoring alternatives available. For a detailed comparison, see:
- Openclaw Astr Assistant vs ansible — Trust Score: 74.9/100
- Openclaw Astr Assistant vs Flowise — Trust Score: 67.5/100
- Openclaw Astr Assistant vs learn-claude-code — Trust Score: 72.1/100
Key Takeaways
- Openclaw Astr Assistant has a measured Nerq Trust Score of 57.2/100 (D) — a composite of independent signals, not a suitability judgment.
- Among DevOps tools, Openclaw Astr Assistant scores near the category average of 63/100 (a positional measurement relative to peers).
- The individual signals — security, maintenance, documentation, compliance, community — are shown above. Weigh them against your own requirements.
- Query the current measured values via Nerq's Preflight API.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Openclaw Astr Assistant Safe?
What is Openclaw Astr Assistant's trust score?
What are safer alternatives to Openclaw Astr Assistant?
How often is Openclaw Astr Assistant's safety score updated?
Can I use Openclaw Astr Assistant in a regulated environment?
See Also
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated measurements based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements, verdicts, or guarantees of suitability. Always evaluate the signals against your own requirements.