Is Pathai Safe?
Pathai — Nerq Trust Score 48.2/100 (D grade). Score based on 2 independent trust signals. Last analyzed: 2026-04-12
Pathai is a AI tool with a Nerq Trust Score of 48.2/100 (D), based on 3 independent data dimensions. Last analyzed: 2026-04-12 Security: 90/100. Popularity: 0/100. Data sourced from privacy policy analysis, data handling practices, company background, and security certifications. Last updated: 2026-04-12. Machine-readable data (JSON).
Is Pathai safe?
Trust Score Breakdown — Pathai has a Nerq Trust Score of 48.2/100 (D). Measured across 2 independent trust signals (as of 2026-04-12).
What is Pathai's trust score?
Pathai has a Nerq Trust Score of 48.2/100, earning a D grade. This score is based on 2 independently measured dimensions including security, maintenance, and community adoption.
What are the key security findings for Pathai?
Pathai's strongest signal is security at 90/100. No known vulnerabilities have been detected.
What is Pathai and who maintains it?
| Author | Unknown |
| Category | Ai Tool |
| Source | N/A |
Popular Alternatives in ai_tool
Similar Ai Tool by Trust Score
Safety Guide: Pathai
What is Pathai?
Pathai is a software tool — AI pathology platform for accurate disease diagnosis from tissue samples..
How to Verify Safety
Review the project for recent activity and known issues.
You can also check the trust score via API: GET /v1/preflight?target=PathAI
Key Safety Concerns for software tool
When evaluating any software tool, watch for: maintenance status, security.
Measured Signals
Pathai has a Nerq Trust Score of 48/100 (D). This score is a composite of automated measurements of security, maintenance, community, and quality signals.
Alternatives
- haotian-liu/LLaVA — 57/100
- wan22_i2v_14b_orbit_shot_lora — 59/100
- ChuckNorris (L1B3RT4S Prompt Enhancer) — 46/100
Key Takeaways
- Pathai has a Trust Score of 48/100 (D).
- The score is a measured composite — it is not a suitability judgment. Evaluate the individual signals against your own requirements.
- Query the current measured values via the Nerq API.
Detailed Score Analysis
| Dimension | Score |
|---|---|
| Security | 90/100 |
| Maintenance | 50/100 |
| Popularity | 0/100 |
| Quality | 40/100 |
| Community | 35/100 |
Based on 5 dimensions. Data from privacy policy analysis, data handling practices, company background, and security certifications.
What data does Pathai collect?
Privacy assessment for Pathai is not yet available. See our methodology for how Nerq measures privacy, or the public privacy review for any community-contributed notes.
Is Pathai secure?
Security score: 90/100. AI pathology platform for accurate disease diagnosis from tissue samples.
Check Pathai's security page for certifications such as SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, or GDPR compliance documentation. These certifications indicate that the vendor follows established security practices and undergoes regular audits.
For enterprise deployments, verify SSO/SAML support, role-based access control, and audit logging capabilities.
Full analysis: Pathai Security Report
How we calculated this score
Pathai's trust score of 48.2/100 (D) is computed from privacy policy analysis, data handling practices, company background, and security certifications. The score reflects 5 independent dimensions: security (90/100), maintenance (50/100), popularity (0/100), quality (40/100), community (35/100). Each dimension is weighted equally to produce the composite trust score.
Nerq analyzes over 7.5 million entities across 26 registries using the same methodology, enabling direct cross-entity comparison. Scores are updated continuously as new data becomes available.
Signals last measured on April 12, 2026. Data version: 0.0.
Full methodology documentation · Machine-readable data (JSON API)
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Pathai Safe?
What is Pathai's trust score?
What are safer alternatives to Pathai?
Does Pathai use my data for training?
Is Pathai safe for confidential work?
Popular in Ai Tool
Browse Categories
See Also
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated measurements based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements, verdicts, or guarantees of suitability. Always evaluate the signals against your own requirements.