Is Polars Safe?
Polars — Nerq Trust Score 64.0/100 (C+ grade). Based on analysis of 2 trust dimensions, it is generally safe but has some concerns. Last updated: 2026-03-31.
Use Polars with some caution. Polars is a Python package with a Nerq Trust Score of 64.0/100 (C+), based on 3 independent data dimensions. It is below the recommended threshold of 70. Security: 70/100. Popularity: 95/100. Data sourced from PyPI registry, GitHub repository, NVD, OSV.dev, and OpenSSF Scorecard. Last updated: 2026-03-31. Machine-readable data (JSON).
Is Polars safe?
CAUTION — Polars has a Nerq Trust Score of 64.0/100 (C+). It has moderate trust signals but shows some areas of concern that warrant attention. Suitable for development use — review security and maintenance signals before production deployment.
What is Polars's trust score?
Polars has a Nerq Trust Score of 64.0/100, earning a C+ grade. This score is based on 2 independently measured dimensions including security, maintenance, and community adoption.
What are the key security findings for Polars?
Polars's strongest signal is popularity at 95/100. No known vulnerabilities have been detected. It has not yet reached the Nerq Verified threshold of 70+.
What is Polars and who maintains it?
| Author | Unknown |
| Category | pypi |
| Source | N/A |
Polars Across Platforms
Same developer/company in other registries:
Similar Pypi by Trust Score
Safety Guide: Polars
What is Polars?
Polars is a Python package — Blazingly fast DataFrame library.
How to Verify Safety
Run pip audit or safety check. Review on PyPI for download stats.
You can also check the trust score via API: GET /v1/preflight?target=polars
Key Safety Concerns for Python packages
When evaluating any Python package, watch for: dependency vulnerabilities, malicious uploads, maintenance status.
Trust Assessment
Polars has a Nerq Trust Score of 64/100 (C+) and has not yet reached Nerq trust threshold (70+). This score is based on automated analysis of security, maintenance, community, and quality signals.
Key Takeaways
- Polars has a Trust Score of 64/100 (C+).
- Review carefully before use — below trust threshold.
- Always verify independently using the Nerq API.
Detailed Score Analysis
| Dimension | Score |
|---|---|
| Security | 70/100 |
| Privacy | 80/100 |
| Reliability | 90/100 |
| Transparency | 85/100 |
| Maintenance | 60/100 |
Based on 5 dimensions. Data from PyPI registry, GitHub repository, NVD, OSV.dev, and OpenSSF Scorecard.
What data does Polars collect?
Polars is a Python package maintained by Unknown. It receives approximately 10,942,929 weekly downloads. Licensed under Copyright (c) 2025 Ritchie Vink Copyright (c) 2024 (Some portions) NVIDIA CORPORATION & AFFI.
As a development package, Polars does not directly collect end-user personal data. However, applications built with it may collect data depending on implementation. Privacy score: 80/100.
Review the package's dependencies for potential supply chain risks. Run your package manager's audit command regularly.
Full analysis: Polars Privacy Report · Privacy review
Is Polars secure?
Security score: 70/100. Polars has 0 known vulnerabilities (CVEs) in the National Vulnerability Database. This is a clean record.
Licensed under Copyright (c) 2025 Ritchie Vink Copyright (c) 2024 (Some portions) NVIDIA CORPORATION & AFFI, allowing code inspection. Open-source packages allow independent security review of the source code.
Run your package manager's audit command (`npm audit`, `pip audit`, `cargo audit`) to check for known vulnerabilities in your dependency tree.
Full analysis: Polars Security Report
How we calculated this score
Polars's trust score of 64.0/100 (C+) is computed from PyPI registry, GitHub repository, NVD, OSV.dev, and OpenSSF Scorecard. The score reflects 5 independent dimensions: security (70/100), privacy (80/100), reliability (90/100), transparency (85/100), maintenance (60/100). Each dimension is weighted equally to produce the composite trust score.
Nerq analyzes over 7.5 million entities across 26 registries using the same methodology, enabling direct cross-entity comparison. Scores are updated continuously as new data becomes available.
This page was last reviewed on March 31, 2026. Data version: 1.0.
Full methodology documentation · Machine-readable data (JSON API)
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Polars safe to use?
What is Polars's trust score?
What are safer alternatives to Polars?
Does Polars have known vulnerabilities?
How actively maintained is Polars?
Popular in pypi
Browse Categories
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.