Is Process Stats Safe?
Process Stats — Nerq Trust Score 51.0/100 (D grade). Score based on 1 independent trust signals.
Process Stats is a software tool with a Nerq Trust Score of 51.0/100 (D), based on 3 independent data dimensions. Data sourced from multiple public sources including package registries, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev, and OpenSSF Scorecard. Last updated: n/a. Machine-readable data (JSON).
Is Process Stats safe?
Trust Score Breakdown — Process Stats has a Nerq Trust Score of 51.0/100 (D). Measured across 1 independent trust signal.
What is Process Stats's trust score?
Process Stats has a Nerq Trust Score of 51.0/100, earning a D grade. This score is based on 1 independently measured dimensions including security, maintenance, and community adoption.
What are the key security findings for Process Stats?
Process Stats's strongest signal is compliance at 100/100. No known vulnerabilities have been detected.
What is Process Stats and who maintains it?
| Author | kikobeats |
| Category | Uncategorized |
| Source | https://www.npmjs.com/package/process-stats |
Regulatory Compliance
| EU AI Act Risk Class | Not assessed |
| Compliance Score | 100/100 |
| Jurisdictions | Assessed across 52 jurisdictions |
Process Stats Across Platforms
Same developer/company in other registries:
What Is Process Stats?
Process Stats is a software tool in the uncategorized category: Display dynamic real-time information about running Node.js process. Nerq Trust Score: 51/100 (D).
Nerq independently analyzes every software tool, app, and extension across multiple trust signals including security vulnerabilities, maintenance activity, license compliance, and community adoption.
How Nerq Assesses Process Stats's Safety
Nerq's Trust Score is calculated from 13+ independent signals aggregated into five dimensions. Here is how Process Stats performs in each:
- Compliance (100/100): Process Stats is broadly compliant. Assessed against regulations in 52 jurisdictions including the EU AI Act, CCPA, and GDPR.
The overall Trust Score of 51.0/100 (D) is the weighted combination of these measured signals. It is a measurement, not a pass/fail or suitability judgment — weigh the individual signals against your own requirements.
Who Typically Evaluates Process Stats?
Process Stats is commonly evaluated by:
- Developers and teams working with uncategorized tools
- Organizations evaluating AI tools for their stack
- Researchers exploring AI capabilities in this domain
How to read the signals: Process Stats's measured signals (the trust signals above) are shown above. These are measurements, not a suitability judgment — weigh each signal against the requirements of your own use case and risk tolerance.
How to Verify Process Stats's Safety Yourself
While Nerq provides automated trust analysis, we recommend these additional steps before adopting any software tool:
- Check the source code — Review the repository security policy, open issues, and recent commits for signs of active maintenance.
- Scan dependencies — Use tools like
npm audit,pip-audit, orsnykto check for known vulnerabilities in Process Stats's dependency tree. - Review permissions — Understand what access Process Stats requires. Software tools should follow the principle of least privilege.
- Test in isolation — Run Process Stats in a sandboxed environment before granting access to production data or systems.
- Monitor continuously — Use Nerq's API to set up automated trust checks:
GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=process-stats - Review the license — Confirm that Process Stats's license is compatible with your intended use case. Pay attention to restrictions on commercial use, redistribution, and derivative works. Some AI tools use dual licensing or have separate terms for enterprise customers that differ from the open-source license.
- Check community signals — Look at the project's issue tracker, discussion forums, and social media presence. A healthy community actively reports bugs, contributes fixes, and discusses security concerns openly. Low community engagement may indicate limited peer review of the codebase.
Common Safety Concerns with Process Stats
When evaluating whether Process Stats is safe, consider these category-specific risks:
Understand how Process Stats processes, stores, and transmits your data. Review the tool's privacy policy and data retention practices, especially for sensitive or proprietary information.
Check Process Stats's dependency tree for known vulnerabilities. Tools with outdated or unmaintained dependencies pose a higher security risk.
Regularly check for updates to Process Stats. Security patches and bug fixes are only effective if you're running the latest version.
If Process Stats connects to external APIs or services, each integration point is a potential attack surface. Audit all third-party connections, verify that data shared with external services is minimized, and ensure that integration credentials are rotated regularly.
Verify that Process Stats's license is compatible with your intended use case. Some AI tools have restrictive licenses that limit commercial use, redistribution, or derivative works. Using Process Stats in violation of its license can expose your organization to legal liability.
Best Practices for Using Process Stats Safely
Whether you're an individual developer or an enterprise team, these practices will help you get the most from Process Stats while minimizing risk:
Periodically review how Process Stats is used in your workflow. Check for unexpected behavior, permissions drift, and compliance with your security policies.
Ensure Process Stats and all its dependencies are running the latest stable versions to benefit from security patches.
Grant Process Stats only the minimum permissions it needs to function. Avoid granting admin or root access.
Subscribe to Process Stats's security advisories and vulnerability disclosures. Use Nerq's API to get automated trust score updates.
Create and maintain a clear policy for how Process Stats is used within your organization, including data handling guidelines and acceptable use cases.
Situations That Warrant Independent Review of Process Stats
Nerq's signals are one input. In the following situations, evaluate Process Stats's measured signals against your own requirements before making a decision:
- Environments handling sensitive or regulated data (healthcare, finance, government)
- Mission-critical systems where downtime has significant business impact
- Deployments with strict regulatory requirements that must be independently validated
For each situation, compare Process Stats's measured trust score of 51.0/100 and its individual signals against your organization's own criteria. Nerq does not assert whether Process Stats is suitable for any particular use.
How Process Stats Compares to Industry Standards
Nerq indexes over 6 million software tools, apps, and packages across dozens of categories. Among uncategorized tools, the average Trust Score is 62/100. Process Stats's score of 51.0/100 is below the category average of 62/100.
This suggests that Process Stats trails behind many comparable uncategorized tools. Organizations with strict security requirements should evaluate whether higher-scoring alternatives better meet their needs.
Industry benchmarks matter because they contextualize a tool's safety profile. A score that looks moderate in isolation may actually represent strong performance within a challenging category — or vice versa. Nerq's category-relative analysis helps teams make informed decisions by showing not just absolute quality, but how a tool ranks against its direct peers.
Trust Score History
Nerq continuously monitors Process Stats and recalculates its Trust Score as new data becomes available. Our scoring engine ingests real-time signals from source repositories, vulnerability databases (NVD, OSV.dev), package registries, and community metrics. When a new CVE is published, a major release ships, or maintenance patterns change, Process Stats's score is updated within 24 hours.
Historical trust trends reveal whether a tool is improving, stable, or declining over time. A tool that consistently maintains or improves its score demonstrates ongoing commitment to security and quality. Conversely, a downward trend may signal reduced maintenance, growing technical debt, or unresolved vulnerabilities. To track Process Stats's score over time, use the Nerq API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=process-stats&include=history
Nerq retains trust score snapshots at regular intervals, enabling trend analysis across weeks and months. Enterprise users can access detailed historical reports showing how each dimension — security, maintenance, documentation, compliance, and community — has evolved independently, providing granular visibility into which aspects of Process Stats are strengthening or weakening over time.
Key Takeaways
- Process Stats has a measured Nerq Trust Score of 51.0/100 (D) — a composite of independent signals, not a suitability judgment.
- Among uncategorized tools, Process Stats scores below the category average of 62/100 (a positional measurement relative to peers).
- The individual signals — security, maintenance, documentation, compliance, community — are shown above. Weigh them against your own requirements.
- Query the current measured values via Nerq's Preflight API.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Process Stats Safe?
What is Process Stats's trust score?
What are safer alternatives to Process Stats?
How often is Process Stats's safety score updated?
Can I use Process Stats in a regulated environment?
See Also
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated measurements based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements, verdicts, or guarantees of suitability. Always evaluate the signals against your own requirements.