Is Rustick Safe?
Rustick — Nerq Trust Score 49.0/100 (F grade). Score based on 5 independent trust signals.
Rustick is a Rust crate with a Nerq Trust Score of 49.0/100 (F). Data sourced from crates.io registry, GitHub, NVD, and RustSec advisory database. Last updated: n/a. Machine-readable data (JSON).
Is Rustick safe?
Trust Score Breakdown — Rustick has a Nerq Trust Score of 49.0/100 (F). Measured across 1 independent trust signal.
What is Rustick's trust score?
Rustick has a Nerq Trust Score of 49.0/100, earning a F grade. This score is based on 5 independently measured dimensions including security, maintenance, and community adoption.
What are the key security findings for Rustick?
Rustick's strongest signal is overall trust at 49.0/100. No known vulnerabilities have been detected.
What is Rustick and who maintains it?
| Author | Unknown |
| Category | Rust Crates |
| Source | N/A |
Similar Crates by Trust Score
Safety Guide: Rustick
What is Rustick?
Rustick is a Rust crate — timers for the Goonstation Space Station 13 codebase using byondapi.
How to Verify Safety
Run cargo audit. Review on crates.io for activity.
You can also check the trust score via API: GET /v1/preflight?target=rustick
Key Safety Concerns for Rust crate
When evaluating any Rust crate, watch for: dependency vulnerabilities, unsafe code, maintenance status.
Measured Signals
Rustick has a Nerq Trust Score of 49/100 (F). This score is a composite of automated measurements of security, maintenance, community, and quality signals.
Key Takeaways
- Rustick has a Trust Score of 49/100 (F).
- The score is a measured composite — it is not a suitability judgment. Evaluate the individual signals against your own requirements.
- Query the current measured values via the Nerq API.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Rustick Safe?
What is Rustick's trust score?
What are safer alternatives to Rustick?
Does Rustick have known vulnerabilities?
Does Rustick use unsafe code?
Popular in Rust Crates
Browse Categories
See Also
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated measurements based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements, verdicts, or guarantees of suitability. Always evaluate the signals against your own requirements.