Is Smart Slider 3 Safe?
Smart Slider 3 — Nerq Trust Score 75.8/100 (B+ grade). Score based on 2 independent trust signals. Last analyzed: 2026-04-12
Smart Slider 3 is a WordPress plugin with a Nerq Trust Score of 75.8/100 (B+), based on 3 independent data dimensions. Last analyzed: 2026-04-12 Security: 90/100. Popularity: 100/100. Data sourced from WordPress.org metadata, WPScan vulnerability database, active installs, and update history. Last updated: 2026-04-12. Machine-readable data (JSON).
Is Smart Slider 3 safe?
Trust Score Breakdown — Smart Slider 3 has a Nerq Trust Score of 75.8/100 (B+). Measured across 2 independent trust signals (as of 2026-04-12).
What is Smart Slider 3's trust score?
Smart Slider 3 has a Nerq Trust Score of 75.8/100, earning a B+ grade. This score is based on 2 independently measured dimensions including security, maintenance, and community adoption.
What are the key security findings for Smart Slider 3?
Smart Slider 3's strongest signal is popularity at 100/100. No known vulnerabilities have been detected.
What is Smart Slider 3 and who maintains it?
| Author | Nextendweb |
| Category | WordPress Plugins |
| Source | N/A |
Similar Wordpress by Trust Score
Compare
Safety Guide: Smart Slider 3
What is Smart Slider 3?
Smart Slider 3 is a WordPress plugin — Responsive slider plugin to create sliders in visual editor easily. Build beautiful image slider, layer slider, video slider, post slider, and more..
How to Verify Safety
Check WordPress.org for support response time, tested WP version. Cross-reference with WPScan.
You can also check the trust score via API: GET /v1/preflight?target=Smart Slider 3
Key Safety Concerns for WordPress plugin
When evaluating any WordPress plugin, watch for: known vulnerabilities, PHP compatibility, plugin conflicts.
Measured Signals
Smart Slider 3 has a Nerq Trust Score of 76/100 (B+). This score is a composite of automated measurements of security, maintenance, community, and quality signals.
Key Takeaways
- Smart Slider 3 has a Trust Score of 76/100 (B+).
- The score is a measured composite — it is not a suitability judgment. Evaluate the individual signals against your own requirements.
- Query the current measured values via the Nerq API.
Detailed Score Analysis
| Dimension | Score |
|---|---|
| Security | 90/100 |
| Maintenance | 100/100 |
| Popularity | 100/100 |
| Quality | 40/100 |
| Community | 35/100 |
Based on 5 dimensions. Data from WordPress.org metadata, WPScan vulnerability database, active installs, and update history.
What data does Smart Slider 3 collect?
Smart Slider 3 has a privacy score of 70/100. Review the documentation and privacy policy for data handling details.
Full analysis: Smart Slider 3 Privacy Report · Privacy review
Is Smart Slider 3 secure?
Security score: 90/100 (0-100, higher = fewer measured security issues).
Nerq monitors this entity against NVD, OSV.dev, and registry-specific vulnerability databases for ongoing security assessment.
Full analysis: Smart Slider 3 Security Report
How we calculated this score
Smart Slider 3's trust score of 75.8/100 (B+) is computed from WordPress.org metadata, WPScan vulnerability database, active installs, and update history. The score reflects 5 independent dimensions: security (90/100), maintenance (100/100), popularity (100/100), quality (40/100), community (35/100). Each dimension is weighted equally to produce the composite trust score.
Nerq analyzes over 7.5 million entities across 26 registries using the same methodology, enabling direct cross-entity comparison. Scores are updated continuously as new data becomes available.
Signals last measured on April 12, 2026. Data version: 1.0.
Full methodology documentation · Machine-readable data (JSON API)
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Smart Slider 3 Safe?
What is Smart Slider 3's trust score?
What are safer alternatives to Smart Slider 3?
Does Smart Slider 3 have known vulnerabilities?
Is Smart Slider 3 compatible with the latest WordPress?
Popular in WordPress Plugins
Browse Categories
See Also
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated measurements based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements, verdicts, or guarantees of suitability. Always evaluate the signals against your own requirements.