Is Cyclic Fire Safe?

Cyclic Fire — Nerq Trust Score 48.2/100 (D grade). Score based on 2 independent trust signals. Last analyzed: 2026-03-25

Cyclic Fire is a npm package with a Nerq Trust Score of 48.2/100 (D), based on 3 independent data dimensions. Last analyzed: 2026-03-25 Security: 90/100. Popularity: 0/100. Data sourced from npm registry, GitHub repository, NVD, OSV.dev, and OpenSSF Scorecard. Last updated: 2026-03-25. Machine-readable data (JSON).

Is Cyclic Fire safe?

Trust Score Breakdown — Cyclic Fire has a Nerq Trust Score of 48.2/100 (D). Measured across 2 independent trust signals (as of 2026-03-25).

Security Analysis → Cyclic Fire Privacy Report →

What is Cyclic Fire's trust score?

Cyclic Fire has a Nerq Trust Score of 48.2/100, earning a D grade. This score is based on 2 independently measured dimensions including security, maintenance, and community adoption.

Security
90
Popularity
0

What are the key security findings for Cyclic Fire?

Cyclic Fire's strongest signal is security at 90/100. No known vulnerabilities have been detected.

✓Security score: 90/100 (strong)
⚠Popularity: 0/100 — community adoption

What is Cyclic Fire and who maintains it?

Authorjemmyw
Categorynpm Packages
SourceN/A

Cyclic Fire Across Platforms

Same developer/company in other registries:

jemmyw.rails-fast-nav
55/100 · vscode

Similar Npm by Trust Score

react-library-boilerplate-for-npm (58)bindler (58)@yassidev/nuxt-directus (58)spectro-kubernetes-client (58)pocketto-svelte (58)
See all safest Npm →

Compare

Cyclic Fire vs react-library-boilerplate-for-npmCyclic Fire vs bindlerCyclic Fire vs @yassidev/nuxt-directus

Safety Guide: Cyclic Fire

What is Cyclic Fire?

Cyclic Fire is a Node.js package — Yet another cyclejs driver for Firebase.

How to Verify Safety

Run npm audit to check for vulnerabilities. Review the package's GitHub repository for recent commits.

You can also check the trust score via API: GET /v1/preflight?target=@sparksnetwork/cyclic-fire

Key Safety Concerns for Node.js package

When evaluating any Node.js package, watch for: dependency vulnerabilities, malicious packages, typosquatting.

Measured Signals

Cyclic Fire has a Nerq Trust Score of 48/100 (D). This score is a composite of automated measurements of security, maintenance, community, and quality signals.

Key Takeaways

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Cyclic Fire Safe?
@sparksnetwork/cyclic-fire with a Nerq Trust Score of 48.2/100 (D). Strongest signal: security (90/100). Score based on Security (90/100), Popularity (0/100).
What is Cyclic Fire's trust score?
@sparksnetwork/cyclic-fire: 48.2/100 (D). Score based on Security (90/100), Popularity (0/100). Scores update as new data becomes available. API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=@sparksnetwork/cyclic-fire
What are safer alternatives to Cyclic Fire?
In the npm Packages category, more Node.js packages are being analyzed — check back soon. @sparksnetwork/cyclic-fire scores 48.2/100.
Does Cyclic Fire have known vulnerabilities?
Nerq checks Cyclic Fire against NVD, OSV.dev, and registry-specific vulnerability databases. Current security score: 90/100. Run your package manager's audit command for the latest findings.
Is Cyclic Fire actively maintained?
Cyclic Fire maintenance score: N/A. Check the repository for recent commit activity and issue responsiveness.
API: /v1/preflight Trust Badge API Docs

See Also

Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated measurements based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements, verdicts, or guarantees of suitability. Always evaluate the signals against your own requirements.

We use cookies for analytics and caching. Privacy