Is Starling Safe?

Starling — Nerq Trust Score 29.8/100 (F grade). Based on analysis of 2 trust dimensions, it is has significant safety risks. Last updated: 2026-03-31.

Starling has significant trust concerns. Starling is a Rust crate with a Nerq Trust Score of 29.8/100 (F), based on 3 independent data dimensions. It is below the recommended threshold of 70. Security: 65/100. Popularity: 5/100. Data sourced from crates.io registry, GitHub, NVD, and RustSec advisory database. Last updated: 2026-03-31. Machine-readable data (JSON).

Is Starling safe?

NO — USE WITH CAUTION — Starling has a Nerq Trust Score of 29.8/100 (F). It has below-average trust signals with significant gaps in security, maintenance, or documentation. Not recommended for production use without thorough manual review and additional security measures.

Security Analysis → {name} Privacy Report →

What is Starling's trust score?

Starling has a Nerq Trust Score of 29.8/100, earning a F grade. This score is based on 2 independently measured dimensions including security, maintenance, and community adoption.

Security
65
Popularity
5

What are the key security findings for Starling?

Starling's strongest signal is security at 65/100. No known vulnerabilities have been detected. It has not yet reached the Nerq Verified threshold of 70+.

Security score: 65/100 (moderate)
Popularity: 5/100 — community adoption

What is Starling and who maintains it?

AuthorUnknown
Categorycrates
SourceN/A

Similar Crates by Trust Score

sc-telemetry (40)risc0-groth16 (40)aws-sdk-glue (40)plane-split (40)dhall_proc_macros (40)
See all safest Crates →

Safety Guide: Starling

What is Starling?

Starling is a Rust crate — This tree structure is a binary merkle tree with branch compression via split indexes..

How to Verify Safety

Run cargo audit. Review on crates.io for activity.

You can also check the trust score via API: GET /v1/preflight?target=starling

Key Safety Concerns for Rust crates

When evaluating any Rust crate, watch for: dependency vulnerabilities, unsafe code, maintenance status.

Trust Assessment

Starling has a Nerq Trust Score of 30/100 (F) and has not yet reached Nerq trust threshold (70+). This score is based on automated analysis of security, maintenance, community, and quality signals.

Key Takeaways

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Starling safe to use?
Significant trust concerns. starling has a Nerq Trust Score of 29.8/100 (F). Strongest signal: security (65/100). Score based on security (65/100), popularity (5/100).
What is Starling's trust score?
starling: 29.8/100 (F). Score based on: security (65/100), popularity (5/100). Scores update as new data becomes available. API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=starling
What are safer alternatives to Starling?
In the crates category, more Rust crates are being analyzed — check back soon. starling scores 29.8/100.
Does Starling have known vulnerabilities?
Nerq checks Starling against NVD, OSV.dev, and registry-specific vulnerability databases. Current security score: 65/100. Run your package manager's audit command for the latest findings.
Does Starling use unsafe code?
Check Starling's crate documentation for unsafe code usage. Trust score: 29.8/100. Fewer unsafe blocks generally indicates better memory safety.
API: /v1/preflight Trust Badge API Docs

Browse Categories

Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.

We use cookies for analytics and caching. Privacy Policy