Is System.Web.Optimization.Less Safe?

System.Web.Optimization.Less — Nerq Trust Score 53.2/100 (C- grade). Based on analysis of 2 trust dimensions, it is has notable safety concerns. Last updated: 2026-04-02.

Use System.Web.Optimization.Less with some caution. System.Web.Optimization.Less is a NuGet package (dotless adapter for System) with a Nerq Trust Score of 53.2/100 (C-), based on 3 independent data dimensions. It is below the recommended threshold of 70. Security: 90/100. Popularity: 0/100. Data sourced from nuget.org, GitHub, and NVD. Last updated: 2026-04-02. Machine-readable data (JSON).

Is System.Web.Optimization.Less safe?

CAUTION — System.Web.Optimization.Less has a Nerq Trust Score of 53.2/100 (C-). It has moderate trust signals but shows some areas of concern that warrant attention. Suitable for development use — review security and maintenance signals before production deployment.

Security Analysis → {name} Privacy Report →

What is System.Web.Optimization.Less's trust score?

System.Web.Optimization.Less has a Nerq Trust Score of 53.2/100, earning a C- grade. This score is based on 2 independently measured dimensions including security, maintenance, and community adoption.

Security
90
Popularity
0

What are the key security findings for System.Web.Optimization.Less?

System.Web.Optimization.Less's strongest signal is security at 90/100. No known vulnerabilities have been detected. It has not yet reached the Nerq Verified threshold of 70+.

Security score: 90/100 (strong)
Popularity: 0/100 — community adoption

What is System.Web.Optimization.Less and who maintains it?

AuthorScott Xu, Vadim Milichev, Marcus Andersson
Categorynuget
SourceN/A

Similar Nuget by Trust Score

SFA.DAS.Http (62)BlazorInputFile (62)Microsoft.KernelMemory.MemoryDb.Redis (62)Serilog.Exceptions.Grpc (62)3Chum.IdentityServer4.AccessTokenValidation (62)
See all safest Nuget →

Compare

System.Web.Optimization.Less vs SFA.DAS.HttpSystem.Web.Optimization.Less vs BlazorInputFileSystem.Web.Optimization.Less vs Microsoft.KernelMemory.MemoryDb.Redis

Safety Guide: System.Web.Optimization.Less

What is System.Web.Optimization.Less?

System.Web.Optimization.Less is a NuGet package — dotless adapter for System.Web.Optimization.

How to Verify Safety

Run dotnet list package --vulnerable. Check publisher on nuget.org.

You can also check the trust score via API: GET /v1/preflight?target=System.Web.Optimization.Less

Key Safety Concerns for NuGet packages

When evaluating any NuGet package, watch for: dependency vulnerabilities, publisher verification.

Trust Assessment

System.Web.Optimization.Less has a Nerq Trust Score of 53/100 (C-) and has not yet reached Nerq trust threshold (70+). This score is based on automated analysis of security, maintenance, community, and quality signals.

Key Takeaways

Frequently Asked Questions

Is System.Web.Optimization.Less safe to use?
Use with some caution. System.Web.Optimization.Less has a Nerq Trust Score of 53.2/100 (C-). Strongest signal: security (90/100). Score based on security (90/100), popularity (0/100).
What is System.Web.Optimization.Less's trust score?
System.Web.Optimization.Less: 53.2/100 (C-). Score based on: security (90/100), popularity (0/100). Scores update as new data becomes available. API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=System.Web.Optimization.Less
What are safer alternatives to System.Web.Optimization.Less?
In the nuget category, more NuGet packages are being analyzed — check back soon. System.Web.Optimization.Less scores 53.2/100.
Does System.Web.Optimization.Less have known vulnerabilities?
Nerq checks System.Web.Optimization.Less against NVD, OSV.dev, and registry-specific vulnerability databases. Current security score: 90/100. Run your package manager's audit command for the latest findings.
Is System.Web.Optimization.Less's publisher verified?
System.Web.Optimization.Less has a trust score of 53.2/100 (C-). Below Nerq Verified threshold — conduct additional review.
API: /v1/preflight Trust Badge API Docs

Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.

We use cookies for analytics and caching. Privacy Policy