Is Uiautomator2 Mcp Server Safe?
Uiautomator2 Mcp Server — Nerq Trust Score 55.0/100 (D grade). Score based on 1 independent trust signals.
Uiautomator2 Mcp Server is a software tool with a Nerq Trust Score of 55.0/100 (D), based on 3 independent data dimensions. Data sourced from multiple public sources including package registries, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev, and OpenSSF Scorecard. Last updated: n/a. Machine-readable data (JSON).
Is Uiautomator2 Mcp Server safe?
Trust Score Breakdown — Uiautomator2 Mcp Server has a Nerq Trust Score of 55.0/100 (D). Measured across 1 independent trust signal.
What is Uiautomator2 Mcp Server's trust score?
Uiautomator2 Mcp Server has a Nerq Trust Score of 55.0/100, earning a D grade. This score is based on 1 independently measured dimensions including security, maintenance, and community adoption.
What are the key security findings for Uiautomator2 Mcp Server?
Uiautomator2 Mcp Server's strongest signal is compliance at 100/100. No known vulnerabilities have been detected.
What is Uiautomator2 Mcp Server and who maintains it?
| Author | unknown |
| Category | Uncategorized |
| Source | https://pypi.org/project/uiautomator2-mcp-server/ |
Regulatory Compliance
| EU AI Act Risk Class | Not assessed |
| Compliance Score | 100/100 |
| Jurisdictions | Assessed across 52 jurisdictions |
What Is Uiautomator2 Mcp Server?
Uiautomator2 Mcp Server is a software tool in the uncategorized category: uiautomator2 mcp server. Nerq Trust Score: 55/100 (D).
Nerq independently analyzes every software tool, app, and extension across multiple trust signals including security vulnerabilities, maintenance activity, license compliance, and community adoption.
How Nerq Assesses Uiautomator2 Mcp Server's Safety
Nerq's Trust Score is calculated from 13+ independent signals aggregated into five dimensions. Here is how Uiautomator2 Mcp Server performs in each:
- Compliance (100/100): Uiautomator2 Mcp Server is broadly compliant. Assessed against regulations in 52 jurisdictions including the EU AI Act, CCPA, and GDPR.
The overall Trust Score of 55.0/100 (D) is the weighted combination of these measured signals. It is a measurement, not a pass/fail or suitability judgment — weigh the individual signals against your own requirements.
Who Typically Evaluates Uiautomator2 Mcp Server?
Uiautomator2 Mcp Server is commonly evaluated by:
- Developers and teams working with uncategorized tools
- Organizations evaluating AI tools for their stack
- Researchers exploring AI capabilities in this domain
How to read the signals: Uiautomator2 Mcp Server's measured signals (the trust signals above) are shown above. These are measurements, not a suitability judgment — weigh each signal against the requirements of your own use case and risk tolerance.
How to Verify Uiautomator2 Mcp Server's Safety Yourself
While Nerq provides automated trust analysis, we recommend these additional steps before adopting any software tool:
- Check the source code — Review the repository security policy, open issues, and recent commits for signs of active maintenance.
- Scan dependencies — Use tools like
npm audit,pip-audit, orsnykto check for known vulnerabilities in Uiautomator2 Mcp Server's dependency tree. - Review permissions — Understand what access Uiautomator2 Mcp Server requires. Software tools should follow the principle of least privilege.
- Test in isolation — Run Uiautomator2 Mcp Server in a sandboxed environment before granting access to production data or systems.
- Monitor continuously — Use Nerq's API to set up automated trust checks:
GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=uiautomator2-mcp-server - Review the license — Confirm that Uiautomator2 Mcp Server's license is compatible with your intended use case. Pay attention to restrictions on commercial use, redistribution, and derivative works. Some AI tools use dual licensing or have separate terms for enterprise customers that differ from the open-source license.
- Check community signals — Look at the project's issue tracker, discussion forums, and social media presence. A healthy community actively reports bugs, contributes fixes, and discusses security concerns openly. Low community engagement may indicate limited peer review of the codebase.
Common Safety Concerns with Uiautomator2 Mcp Server
When evaluating whether Uiautomator2 Mcp Server is safe, consider these category-specific risks:
Understand how Uiautomator2 Mcp Server processes, stores, and transmits your data. Review the tool's privacy policy and data retention practices, especially for sensitive or proprietary information.
Check Uiautomator2 Mcp Server's dependency tree for known vulnerabilities. Tools with outdated or unmaintained dependencies pose a higher security risk.
Regularly check for updates to Uiautomator2 Mcp Server. Security patches and bug fixes are only effective if you're running the latest version.
If Uiautomator2 Mcp Server connects to external APIs or services, each integration point is a potential attack surface. Audit all third-party connections, verify that data shared with external services is minimized, and ensure that integration credentials are rotated regularly.
Verify that Uiautomator2 Mcp Server's license is compatible with your intended use case. Some AI tools have restrictive licenses that limit commercial use, redistribution, or derivative works. Using Uiautomator2 Mcp Server in violation of its license can expose your organization to legal liability.
Best Practices for Using Uiautomator2 Mcp Server Safely
Whether you're an individual developer or an enterprise team, these practices will help you get the most from Uiautomator2 Mcp Server while minimizing risk:
Periodically review how Uiautomator2 Mcp Server is used in your workflow. Check for unexpected behavior, permissions drift, and compliance with your security policies.
Ensure Uiautomator2 Mcp Server and all its dependencies are running the latest stable versions to benefit from security patches.
Grant Uiautomator2 Mcp Server only the minimum permissions it needs to function. Avoid granting admin or root access.
Subscribe to Uiautomator2 Mcp Server's security advisories and vulnerability disclosures. Use Nerq's API to get automated trust score updates.
Create and maintain a clear policy for how Uiautomator2 Mcp Server is used within your organization, including data handling guidelines and acceptable use cases.
Situations That Warrant Independent Review of Uiautomator2 Mcp Server
Nerq's signals are one input. In the following situations, evaluate Uiautomator2 Mcp Server's measured signals against your own requirements before making a decision:
- Environments handling sensitive or regulated data (healthcare, finance, government)
- Mission-critical systems where downtime has significant business impact
- Deployments with strict regulatory requirements that must be independently validated
For each situation, compare Uiautomator2 Mcp Server's measured trust score of 55.0/100 and its individual signals against your organization's own criteria. Nerq does not assert whether Uiautomator2 Mcp Server is suitable for any particular use.
How Uiautomator2 Mcp Server Compares to Industry Standards
Nerq indexes over 6 million software tools, apps, and packages across dozens of categories. Among uncategorized tools, the average Trust Score is 62/100. Uiautomator2 Mcp Server's score of 55.0/100 is near the category average of 62/100.
This places Uiautomator2 Mcp Server in line with the typical uncategorized tool tool. It meets baseline expectations but does not distinguish itself from peers on trust metrics.
Industry benchmarks matter because they contextualize a tool's safety profile. A score that looks moderate in isolation may actually represent strong performance within a challenging category — or vice versa. Nerq's category-relative analysis helps teams make informed decisions by showing not just absolute quality, but how a tool ranks against its direct peers.
Trust Score History
Nerq continuously monitors Uiautomator2 Mcp Server and recalculates its Trust Score as new data becomes available. Our scoring engine ingests real-time signals from source repositories, vulnerability databases (NVD, OSV.dev), package registries, and community metrics. When a new CVE is published, a major release ships, or maintenance patterns change, Uiautomator2 Mcp Server's score is updated within 24 hours.
Historical trust trends reveal whether a tool is improving, stable, or declining over time. A tool that consistently maintains or improves its score demonstrates ongoing commitment to security and quality. Conversely, a downward trend may signal reduced maintenance, growing technical debt, or unresolved vulnerabilities. To track Uiautomator2 Mcp Server's score over time, use the Nerq API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=uiautomator2-mcp-server&include=history
Nerq retains trust score snapshots at regular intervals, enabling trend analysis across weeks and months. Enterprise users can access detailed historical reports showing how each dimension — security, maintenance, documentation, compliance, and community — has evolved independently, providing granular visibility into which aspects of Uiautomator2 Mcp Server are strengthening or weakening over time.
Key Takeaways
- Uiautomator2 Mcp Server has a measured Nerq Trust Score of 55.0/100 (D) — a composite of independent signals, not a suitability judgment.
- Among uncategorized tools, Uiautomator2 Mcp Server scores near the category average of 62/100 (a positional measurement relative to peers).
- The individual signals — security, maintenance, documentation, compliance, community — are shown above. Weigh them against your own requirements.
- Query the current measured values via Nerq's Preflight API.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Uiautomator2 Mcp Server Safe?
What is Uiautomator2 Mcp Server's trust score?
What are safer alternatives to Uiautomator2 Mcp Server?
How often is Uiautomator2 Mcp Server's safety score updated?
Can I use Uiautomator2 Mcp Server in a regulated environment?
See Also
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated measurements based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements, verdicts, or guarantees of suitability. Always evaluate the signals against your own requirements.