Är Phate säker?
Phate — Nerq Trust Score 66.1/100 (Betyg C). Baserat på analys av 5 tillitsdimensioner bedöms det som generellt säkert men med vissa farhågor. Senast uppdaterad: 2026-04-21.
Använd Phate med försiktighet. Phate är en programvara med ett Nerq-förtroendepoäng på 66.1/100 (C), baserat på 5 oberoende datadimensioner. Under Nerqs verifierade tröskel Säkerhet: 0/100. Underhåll: 0/100. Popularitet: 0/100. Data hämtad från flera offentliga källor inklusive paketregister, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev och OpenSSF Scorecard. Senast uppdaterad: 2026-04-21. Maskinläsbar data (JSON).
Är Phate säker?
CAUTION — Phate has a Nerq Trust Score of 66.1/100 (C). Har måttliga förtroendesignaler men uppvisar vissa oroande områden that warrant attention. Suitable for development use — review säkerhet and underhåll signals before production deployment.
Vad är Phates förtroendepoäng?
Phate har ett Nerq-förtroendepoäng på 66.1/100 med betyget C. Denna poäng baseras på 5 oberoende mätta dimensioner inklusive säkerhet, underhåll och communityanvändning.
Vilka är de viktigaste säkerhetsresultaten för Phate?
Phates starkaste signal är regelefterlevnad på 73/100. Inga kända sårbarheter har upptäckts. Har ännu inte nått Nerqs verifieringströskel på 70+.
Vad är Phate och vem underhåller det?
| Utvecklare | Unknown |
| Kategori | Uncategorized |
| Stjärnor | 535 |
| Källa | https://github.com/KrishnaswamyLab/PHATE |
Regelefterlevnad
| EU AI Act Risk Class | Not assessed |
| Compliance Score | 73/100 |
| Jurisdiktions | Assessed across 52 jurisdiktions |
What Is Phate?
Phate is a programvara in the uncategorized category: PHATE (Potential of Heat-diffusion for Affinity-based Transition Embedding) is a tool for visualizing high dimensional data.. It has 535 GitHub-stjärnor. Nerq Trust Score: 66/100 (C).
Nerq independently analyzes every programvara, app, and extension across multiple trust signals including säkerhet vulnerabilities, underhåll activity, license regelefterlevnad, and communityanvändning.
How Nerq Assesses Phate's Safety
Nerq's Trust Score is calculated from 13+ independent signals aggregated into five dimensioner. Here is how Phate performs in each:
- Säkerhet (0/100): Phate's säkerhet posture is poor. This score factors in known CVEs, dependency vulnerabilities, säkerhet policy presence, and code signing practices.
- Underhåll (0/100): Phate is potentially abandoned. We track commit frequency, release cadence, issue response times, and PR merge rates.
- Documentation (0/100): Documentation quality is insufficient. This includes README completeness, API dokumentation, usage examples, and contribution guidelines.
- Compliance (73/100): Phate is broadly compliant. Assessed against regulations in 52 jurisdiktions including the EU AI Act, CCPA, and GDPR.
- Community (0/100): Community adoption is limited. Baserad på GitHub-stjärnor, forks, download counts, and ecosystem integrations.
The overall Trust Score of 66.1/100 (C) reflects the weighted combination of these signals. This is below the Nerq Verified threshold of 70. We recommend additional due diligence before production deployment.
Who Should Use Phate?
Phate is designed for:
- Developers and teams working with uncategorized tools
- Organizations evaluating AI tools for their stack
- Researchers exploring AI capabilities in this domain
Risk guidance: Phate is suitable for development and testing environments. Before production deployment, conduct a thorough review of its säkerhet posture, review the specific trust signals above, and consider whether a higher-scored alternative meets your requirements.
How to Verify Phate's Safety Yourself
While Nerq provides automated trust analysis, we recommend these additional steps before adopting any programvara:
- Check the source code — Granska repository's säkerhet policy, open issues, and recent commits for signs of active underhåll.
- Scan dependencies — Use tools like
npm audit,pip-audit, orsnykto check for known vulnerabilities in Phate's dependency tree. - Recension permissions — Understand what access Phate requires. Software tools should follow the principle of least privilege.
- Test in isolation — Run Phate in a sandboxed environment before granting access to production data or systems.
- Monitor continuously — Use Nerq's API to set up automated trust checks:
GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=KrishnaswamyLab/PHATE - Granska license — Confirm that Phate's license is compatible with your intended use case. Pay attention to restrictions on commercial use, redistribution, and derivative works. Some AI tools use dual licensing or have separate terms for enterprise customers that differ from the open-source license.
- Check community signals — Look at the project's issue tracker, discussion forums, and social media presence. A healthy community actively reports bugs, contributes fixes, and discusses säkerhet concerns openly. Low community engagement may indicate limited peer review of the codebase.
Common Safety Concerns with Phate
When evaluating whether Phate is safe, consider these category-specific risks:
Understand how Phate processes, stores, and transmits your data. Granska tool's privacy policy and data retention practices, especially for sensitive or proprietary information.
Check Phate's dependency tree for known vulnerabilities. Tools with outdated or unmaintained dependencies pose a higher säkerhet risk.
Regularly check for updates to Phate. Säkerhet patches and bug fixes are only effective if you're running the latest version.
If Phate connects to external APIs or services, each integration point is a potential attack surface. Audit all third-party connections, verify that data shared with external services is minimized, and ensure that integration credentials are rotated regularly.
Verify that Phate's license is compatible with your intended use case. Some AI tools have restrictive licenses that limit commercial use, redistribution, or derivative works. Using Phate in violation of its license can expose your organization to legal liability.
Best Practices for Using Phate Safely
Whether you're an individual developer or an enterprise team, these practices will help you get the most from Phate while minimizing risk:
Periodically review how Phate is used in your workflow. Check for unexpected behavior, permissions drift, and regelefterlevnad with your säkerhet policies.
Ensure Phate and all its dependencies are running the latest stable versions to benefit from säkerhet patches.
Grant Phate only the minimum permissions it needs to function. Avoid granting admin or root access.
Subscribe to Phate's säkerhet advisories and vulnerability disclosures. Use Nerq's API to get automated trust score updates.
Create and maintain a clear policy for how Phate is used within your organization, including data handling guidelines and acceptable use cases.
When Should You Avoid Phate?
Even promising tools aren't right for every situation. Consider avoiding Phate in these scenarios:
- Production environments handling sensitive customer data
- Regulated industries (healthcare, finance, government) without additional regelefterlevnad review
- Mission-critical systems where downtime has significant business impact
For each scenario, evaluate whether Phate's trust score of 66.1/100 meets your organization's risk tolerance. We recommend running a manual säkerhet assessment alongside the automated Nerq score.
How Phate Compares to Industry Standards
Nerq indexes over 6 million programvaras, apps, and packages across dozens of categories. Among uncategorized tools, the average Trust Score is 62/100. Phate's score of 66.1/100 is above the category average of 62/100.
This positions Phate favorably among uncategorized tools. While it outperforms the average, there is still room for improvement in certain trust dimensioner.
Industry benchmarks matter because they contextualize a tool's safety profile. A score that looks måttlig in isolation may actually represent strong performance within a challenging category — or vice versa. Nerq's category-relative analysis helps teams make informed decisions by showing not just absolute quality, but how a tool ranks against its direct peers.
Trust Score History
Nerq continuously monitors Phate and recalculates its Trust Score as new data becomes available. Our scoring engine ingests real-time signals from source repositories, vulnerability databases (NVD, OSV.dev), package registries, and community metrics. When a new CVE is published, a major release ships, or underhåll patterns change, Phate's score is updated within 24 hours.
Historical trust trends reveal whether a tool is improving, stable, or declining over time. A tool that consistently maintains or improves its score demonstrates ongoing commitment to säkerhet and quality. Conversely, a downward trend may signal reduced underhåll, growing technical debt, or unresolved vulnerabilities. To track Phate's score over time, use the Nerq API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=KrishnaswamyLab/PHATE&include=history
Nerq retains trust score snapshots at regular intervals, enabling trend analysis across weeks and months. Enterprise users can access detailed historical reports showing how each dimension — säkerhet, underhåll, dokumentation, regelefterlevnad, and community — has evolved independently, providing granular visibility into which aspects of Phate are strengthening or weakening over time.
Viktigaste slutsatser
- Phate has a Trust Score of 66.1/100 (C) and is not yet Nerq Verified.
- Phate shows måttlig trust signals. Conduct thorough due diligence before deploying to production environments.
- Among uncategorized tools, Phate scores above the category average of 62/100, demonstrating above-average reliability.
- Always verify safety independently — use Nerq's Preflight API for automated, up-to-date trust checks before integration.
Vanliga frågor
Är Phate säker?
Vad är Phates förtroendepoäng?
Vilka är säkrare alternativ till Phate?
Hur ofta uppdateras Phates säkerhetspoäng?
Kan jag använda Phate i en reglerad miljö?
Se även
Disclaimer: Nerqs förtroendepoäng är automatiserade bedömningar baserade på offentligt tillgängliga signaler. De utgör inte rekommendationer eller garantier. Gör alltid din egen verifiering.