Är Pubmed Cli säker?
Pubmed Cli — Nerq Trust Score 48.1/100 (Betyg D). Baserat på analys av 5 tillitsdimensioner bedöms det som har anmärkningsvärda säkerhetsproblem. Senast uppdaterad: 2026-04-23.
Var försiktig med Pubmed Cli. Pubmed Cli är en programvara med ett Nerq-förtroendepoäng på 48.1/100 (D), baserat på 5 oberoende datadimensioner. Under Nerqs verifierade tröskel Säkerhet: 0/100. Underhåll: 1/100. Popularitet: 0/100. Data hämtad från flera offentliga källor inklusive paketregister, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev och OpenSSF Scorecard. Senast uppdaterad: 2026-04-23. Maskinläsbar data (JSON).
Är Pubmed Cli säker?
NO — USE WITH CAUTION — Pubmed Cli has a Nerq Trust Score of 48.1/100 (D). Har lägre än genomsnittliga förtroendesignaler med betydande luckor in säkerhet, underhåll, or dokumentation. Not recommended for production use without thorough manual review and additional säkerhet measures.
Vad är Pubmed Clis förtroendepoäng?
Pubmed Cli har ett Nerq-förtroendepoäng på 48.1/100 med betyget D. Denna poäng baseras på 5 oberoende mätta dimensioner inklusive säkerhet, underhåll och communityanvändning.
Vilka är de viktigaste säkerhetsresultaten för Pubmed Cli?
Pubmed Clis starkaste signal är regelefterlevnad på 48/100. Inga kända sårbarheter har upptäckts. Har ännu inte nått Nerqs verifieringströskel på 70+.
Vad är Pubmed Cli och vem underhåller det?
| Utvecklare | henrybloomingdale |
| Kategori | Research |
| Källa | https://github.com/henrybloomingdale/pubmed-cli |
| Frameworks | openai · anthropic |
| Protocols | rest |
Regelefterlevnad
| EU AI Act Risk Class | MINIMAL |
| Compliance Score | 48/100 |
| Jurisdiktions | Assessed across 52 jurisdiktions |
Populära alternativ inom research
What Is Pubmed Cli?
Pubmed Cli is a programvara in the research category: PubMed from your terminal, built for humans and AI agents.. Nerq Trust Score: 48/100 (D).
Nerq independently analyzes every programvara, app, and extension across multiple trust signals including säkerhet vulnerabilities, underhåll activity, license regelefterlevnad, and communityanvändning.
How Nerq Assesses Pubmed Cli's Safety
Nerq's Trust Score is calculated from 13+ independent signals aggregated into five dimensioner. Here is how Pubmed Cli performs in each:
- Säkerhet (0/100): Pubmed Cli's säkerhet posture is poor. This score factors in known CVEs, dependency vulnerabilities, säkerhet policy presence, and code signing practices.
- Underhåll (1/100): Pubmed Cli is potentially abandoned. We track commit frequency, release cadence, issue response times, and PR merge rates.
- Documentation (1/100): Documentation quality is insufficient. This includes README completeness, API dokumentation, usage examples, and contribution guidelines.
- Compliance (48/100): Pubmed Cli is regelefterlevnad gaps exist. Assessed against regulations in 52 jurisdiktions including the EU AI Act, CCPA, and GDPR.
- Community (0/100): Community adoption is limited. Baserad på GitHub-stjärnor, forks, download counts, and ecosystem integrations.
The overall Trust Score of 48.1/100 (D) reflects the weighted combination of these signals. This is below the Nerq Verified threshold of 70. We recommend additional due diligence before production deployment.
Who Should Use Pubmed Cli?
Pubmed Cli is designed for:
- Developers and teams working with research tools
- Organizations evaluating AI tools for their stack
- Researchers exploring AI capabilities in this domain
Risk guidance: We recommend caution with Pubmed Cli. The low trust score suggests potential risks in säkerhet, underhåll, or community support. Consider using a more established alternative for any production or sensitive workload.
How to Verify Pubmed Cli's Safety Yourself
While Nerq provides automated trust analysis, we recommend these additional steps before adopting any programvara:
- Check the source code — Granska repository's säkerhet policy, open issues, and recent commits for signs of active underhåll.
- Scan dependencies — Use tools like
npm audit,pip-audit, orsnykto check for known vulnerabilities in Pubmed Cli's dependency tree. - Recension permissions — Understand what access Pubmed Cli requires. Software tools should follow the principle of least privilege.
- Test in isolation — Run Pubmed Cli in a sandboxed environment before granting access to production data or systems.
- Monitor continuously — Use Nerq's API to set up automated trust checks:
GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=pubmed-cli - Granska license — Confirm that Pubmed Cli's license is compatible with your intended use case. Pay attention to restrictions on commercial use, redistribution, and derivative works. Some AI tools use dual licensing or have separate terms for enterprise customers that differ from the open-source license.
- Check community signals — Look at the project's issue tracker, discussion forums, and social media presence. A healthy community actively reports bugs, contributes fixes, and discusses säkerhet concerns openly. Low community engagement may indicate limited peer review of the codebase.
Common Safety Concerns with Pubmed Cli
When evaluating whether Pubmed Cli is safe, consider these category-specific risks:
Understand how Pubmed Cli processes, stores, and transmits your data. Granska tool's privacy policy and data retention practices, especially for sensitive or proprietary information.
Check Pubmed Cli's dependency tree for known vulnerabilities. Tools with outdated or unmaintained dependencies pose a higher säkerhet risk.
Regularly check for updates to Pubmed Cli. Säkerhet patches and bug fixes are only effective if you're running the latest version.
If Pubmed Cli connects to external APIs or services, each integration point is a potential attack surface. Audit all third-party connections, verify that data shared with external services is minimized, and ensure that integration credentials are rotated regularly.
Verify that Pubmed Cli's license is compatible with your intended use case. Some AI tools have restrictive licenses that limit commercial use, redistribution, or derivative works. Using Pubmed Cli in violation of its license can expose your organization to legal liability.
Pubmed Cli and the EU AI Act
Pubmed Cli is classified as Minimal Risk under the EU AI Act. This is the lowest risk category, meaning it faces minimal regulatory requirements. However, transparency obligations still apply.
Nerq's regelefterlevnad assessment covers 52 jurisdiktions worldwide. For organizations deploying AI tools in regulated environments, understanding these classifications is essential for legal regelefterlevnad.
Best Practices for Using Pubmed Cli Safely
Whether you're an individual developer or an enterprise team, these practices will help you get the most from Pubmed Cli while minimizing risk:
Periodically review how Pubmed Cli is used in your workflow. Check for unexpected behavior, permissions drift, and regelefterlevnad with your säkerhet policies.
Ensure Pubmed Cli and all its dependencies are running the latest stable versions to benefit from säkerhet patches.
Grant Pubmed Cli only the minimum permissions it needs to function. Avoid granting admin or root access.
Subscribe to Pubmed Cli's säkerhet advisories and vulnerability disclosures. Use Nerq's API to get automated trust score updates.
Create and maintain a clear policy for how Pubmed Cli is used within your organization, including data handling guidelines and acceptable use cases.
When Should You Avoid Pubmed Cli?
Even promising tools aren't right for every situation. Consider avoiding Pubmed Cli in these scenarios:
- Production environments handling sensitive customer data
- Regulated industries (healthcare, finance, government) without additional regelefterlevnad review
- Mission-critical systems where downtime has significant business impact
For each scenario, evaluate whether Pubmed Cli's trust score of 48.1/100 meets your organization's risk tolerance. We recommend running a manual säkerhet assessment alongside the automated Nerq score.
How Pubmed Cli Compares to Industry Standards
Nerq indexes over 6 million programvaras, apps, and packages across dozens of categories. Among research tools, the average Trust Score is 62/100. Pubmed Cli's score of 48.1/100 is below the category average of 62/100.
This suggests that Pubmed Cli trails behind many comparable research tools. Organizations with strict säkerhet requirements should evaluate whether higher-scoring alternatives better meet their needs.
Industry benchmarks matter because they contextualize a tool's safety profile. A score that looks måttlig in isolation may actually represent strong performance within a challenging category — or vice versa. Nerq's category-relative analysis helps teams make informed decisions by showing not just absolute quality, but how a tool ranks against its direct peers.
Trust Score History
Nerq continuously monitors Pubmed Cli and recalculates its Trust Score as new data becomes available. Our scoring engine ingests real-time signals from source repositories, vulnerability databases (NVD, OSV.dev), package registries, and community metrics. When a new CVE is published, a major release ships, or underhåll patterns change, Pubmed Cli's score is updated within 24 hours.
Historical trust trends reveal whether a tool is improving, stable, or declining over time. A tool that consistently maintains or improves its score demonstrates ongoing commitment to säkerhet and quality. Conversely, a downward trend may signal reduced underhåll, growing technical debt, or unresolved vulnerabilities. To track Pubmed Cli's score over time, use the Nerq API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=pubmed-cli&include=history
Nerq retains trust score snapshots at regular intervals, enabling trend analysis across weeks and months. Enterprise users can access detailed historical reports showing how each dimension — säkerhet, underhåll, dokumentation, regelefterlevnad, and community — has evolved independently, providing granular visibility into which aspects of Pubmed Cli are strengthening or weakening over time.
Pubmed Cli vs Alternativ
In the research category, Pubmed Cli scores 48.1/100. There are higher-scoring alternatives available. For a detailed comparison, see:
- Pubmed Cli vs gpt_academic — Trust Score: 71.3/100
- Pubmed Cli vs LlamaFactory — Trust Score: 65.5/100
- Pubmed Cli vs unsloth — Trust Score: 66.7/100
Viktigaste slutsatser
- Pubmed Cli has a Trust Score of 48.1/100 (D) and is not yet Nerq Verified.
- Pubmed Cli has significant trust gaps. Consider higher-rated alternatives unless specific requirements mandate its use.
- Among research tools, Pubmed Cli scores below the category average of 62/100, suggesting room for improvement relative to peers.
- Always verify safety independently — use Nerq's Preflight API for automated, up-to-date trust checks before integration.
Detaljerad poänganalys
| Dimension | Poäng |
|---|---|
| Säkerhet | 0/100 |
| Underhåll | 1/100 |
| Popularitet | 0/100 |
Baserad på 3 dimensioner. Data från flera offentliga källor inklusive paketregister, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev och OpenSSF Scorecard.
Vilka data samlar Pubmed Cli in?
Integritet assessment for Pubmed Cli is not yet available. See our methodology for how Nerq measures privacy, or the public privacy review for any community-contributed notes.
Är Pubmed Cli säker?
Säkerhetspoäng: 0/100. Review säkerhet practices and consider alternatives with higher säkerhet scores for sensitive use cases.
Nerq övervakar denna entitet mot NVD, OSV.dev och registerspecifika sårbarhetsdatabaser för löpande säkerhetsbedömning.
Fullständig analys: Pubmed Cli säkerhetsrapport
Så beräknade vi denna poäng
Pubmed Cli's trust score of 48.1/100 (D) beräknas utifrån flera offentliga källor inklusive paketregister, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev och OpenSSF Scorecard. Poängen speglar 3 oberoende dimensioner: säkerhet (0/100), underhåll (1/100), popularitet (0/100). Varje dimension ges lika vikt för att producera den sammansatta förtroendepoängen.
Nerq analyserar över 7,5 miljoner entiteter i 26 register med samma metodik, vilket möjliggör direkt jämförelse mellan entiteter. Poäng uppdateras löpande när ny data finns tillgänglig.
Den här sidan granskades senast April 23, 2026. Dataversion: 1.0.
Fullständig metodikdokumentation · Maskinläsbar data (JSON API)
Vanliga frågor
Är Pubmed Cli säker?
Vad är Pubmed Clis förtroendepoäng?
Vilka är säkrare alternativ till Pubmed Cli?
Hur ofta uppdateras Pubmed Clis säkerhetspoäng?
Kan jag använda Pubmed Cli i en reglerad miljö?
Se även
Disclaimer: Nerqs förtroendepoäng är automatiserade bedömningar baserade på offentligt tillgängliga signaler. De utgör inte rekommendationer eller garantier. Gör alltid din egen verifiering.