Agent Memory Store安全吗?

Agent Memory Store — Nerq Trust Score 64.9/100 (C级). 基于5个信任维度的分析,被评估为总体安全但存在一些担忧。 最后更新:2026-04-21。

请谨慎使用Agent Memory Store。 Agent Memory Store 是一个software tool Nerq 信任分数 64.9/100(C), 基于5个独立数据维度. 低于 Nerq 验证阈值 安全: 0/100. 维护: 1/100. 人气度: 0/100. 数据来源于多个公共来源,包括包注册表、GitHub、NVD、OSV.dev和OpenSSF Scorecard。最后更新:2026-04-21。 机器可读数据(JSON).

Agent Memory Store安全吗?

CAUTION — Agent Memory Store has a Nerq Trust Score of 64.9/100 (C). 信任信号中等,但存在一些值得关注的方面 that warrant attention. Suitable for development use — review 安全性 and 维护 signals before production deployment.

安全分析 → Agent Memory Store隐私报告 →

Agent Memory Store的信任评分是多少?

Agent Memory Store 的 Nerq 信任分数为 64.9/100,等级为 C。该分数基于 5 个独立测量的维度,包括安全性、维护和社区采用。

安全性
0
合规性
100
维护
1
文档
1
人气
0

Agent Memory Store的主要安全发现是什么?

Agent Memory Store 最强的信号是 合规性,为 100/100。 未检测到已知漏洞。 尚未达到 Nerq 认证阈值 70+。

安全评分: 0/100 (弱)
维护: 1/100 — 低维护活动
合规性: 100/100 — covers 52 of 52 司法管辖区s
文档: 1/100 — 有限文档
人气: 0/100 — 社区采用

Agent Memory Store是什么,谁在维护它?

开发者evansenter
类别Coding
来源https://github.com/evansenter/agent-memory-store
Frameworksanthropic · huggingface
Protocolsmcp · rest

合规性

EU AI Act Risk ClassMINIMAL
Compliance Score100/100
管辖权sAssessed across 52 司法管辖区s

coding中的热门替代品

Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPT
74.7/100 · B
github
ollama/ollama
73.8/100 · B
github
langchain-ai/langchain
86.4/100 · A
github
x1xhlol/system-prompts-and-models-of-ai-tools
73.8/100 · B
github
anomalyco/opencode
64.1/100 · C+
github

What Is Agent Memory Store?

Agent Memory Store is a software tool in the coding category: MCP server for shared persistent memory across Claude Code sessions. Nerq Trust Score: 65/100 (C).

Nerq independently analyzes every software tool, app, and extension across multiple trust signals including 安全性 vulnerabilities, 维护 activity, license 合规性, and 社区采用.

How Nerq Assesses Agent Memory Store's Safety

Nerq's Trust Score is calculated from 13+ independent signals aggregated into five 维度. Here is how Agent Memory Store performs in each:

The overall Trust Score of 64.9/100 (C) reflects the weighted combination of these signals. This is below the Nerq Verified threshold of 70. We recommend additional due diligence before production deployment.

Who Should Use Agent Memory Store?

Agent Memory Store is designed for:

Risk guidance: Agent Memory Store is suitable for development and testing environments. Before production deployment, conduct a thorough review of its 安全性 posture, review the specific trust signals above, and consider whether a higher-scored alternative meets your requirements.

How to Verify Agent Memory Store's Safety Yourself

While Nerq provides automated trust analysis, we recommend these additional steps before adopting any software tool:

  1. Check the source code — 查看 repository's 安全性 policy, open issues, and recent commits for signs of active 维护.
  2. Scan dependencies — Use tools like npm audit, pip-audit, or snyk to check for known vulnerabilities in Agent Memory Store's dependency tree.
  3. 评论 permissions — Understand what access Agent Memory Store requires. Software tools should follow the principle of least privilege.
  4. Test in isolation — Run Agent Memory Store in a sandboxed environment before granting access to production data or systems.
  5. Monitor continuously — Use Nerq's API to set up automated trust checks: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=agent-memory-store
  6. 查看 license — Confirm that Agent Memory Store's license is compatible with your intended use case. Pay attention to restrictions on commercial use, redistribution, and derivative works. Some AI tools use dual licensing or have separate terms for enterprise customers that differ from the open-source license.
  7. Check community signals — Look at the project's issue tracker, discussion forums, and social media presence. A healthy community actively reports bugs, contributes fixes, and discusses 安全性 concerns openly. Low community engagement may indicate limited peer review of the codebase.

Common Safety Concerns with Agent Memory Store

When evaluating whether Agent Memory Store is safe, consider these category-specific risks:

Data handling

Understand how Agent Memory Store processes, stores, and transmits your data. 查看 tool's privacy policy and data retention practices, especially for sensitive or proprietary information.

Dependency 安全性

Check Agent Memory Store's dependency tree for known vulnerabilities. Tools with outdated or unmaintained dependencies pose a higher 安全性 risk.

Update frequency

Regularly check for updates to Agent Memory Store. 安全性 patches and bug fixes are only effective if you're running the latest version.

Third-party integrations

If Agent Memory Store connects to external APIs or services, each integration point is a potential attack surface. Audit all third-party connections, verify that data shared with external services is minimized, and ensure that integration credentials are rotated regularly.

License and IP 合规性

Verify that Agent Memory Store's license is compatible with your intended use case. Some AI tools have restrictive licenses that limit commercial use, redistribution, or derivative works. Using Agent Memory Store in violation of its license can expose your organization to legal liability.

Agent Memory Store and the EU AI Act

Agent Memory Store is classified as Minimal Risk under the EU AI Act. This is the lowest risk category, meaning it faces minimal regulatory requirements. However, transparency obligations still apply.

Nerq's 合规性 assessment covers 52 司法管辖区s worldwide. For organizations deploying AI tools in regulated environments, understanding these classifications is essential for legal 合规性.

Best Practices for Using Agent Memory Store Safely

Whether you're an individual developer or an enterprise team, these practices will help you get the most from Agent Memory Store while minimizing risk:

Conduct regular audits

Periodically review how Agent Memory Store is used in your workflow. Check for unexpected behavior, permissions drift, and 合规性 with your 安全性 policies.

Keep dependencies updated

Ensure Agent Memory Store and all its dependencies are running the latest stable versions to benefit from 安全性 patches.

Follow least privilege

Grant Agent Memory Store only the minimum permissions it needs to function. Avoid granting admin or root access.

Monitor for 安全性 advisories

Subscribe to Agent Memory Store's 安全性 advisories and vulnerability disclosures. Use Nerq's API to get automated trust score updates.

Document usage policies

Create and maintain a clear policy for how Agent Memory Store is used within your organization, including data handling guidelines and acceptable use cases.

When Should You Avoid Agent Memory Store?

Even promising tools aren't right for every situation. Consider avoiding Agent Memory Store in these scenarios:

For each scenario, evaluate whether Agent Memory Store's trust score of 64.9/100 meets your organization's risk tolerance. We recommend running a manual 安全性 assessment alongside the automated Nerq score.

How Agent Memory Store Compares to Industry Standards

Nerq indexes over 6 million software tools, apps, and packages across dozens of categories. Among coding tools, the average Trust Score is 62/100. Agent Memory Store's score of 64.9/100 is above the category average of 62/100.

This positions Agent Memory Store favorably among coding tools. While it outperforms the average, there is still room for improvement in certain trust 维度.

Industry benchmarks matter because they contextualize a tool's safety profile. A score that looks 中等 in isolation may actually represent strong performance within a challenging category — or vice versa. Nerq's category-relative analysis helps teams make informed decisions by showing not just absolute quality, but how a tool ranks against its direct peers.

Trust Score History

Nerq continuously monitors Agent Memory Store and recalculates its Trust Score as new data becomes available. Our scoring engine ingests real-time signals from source repositories, vulnerability databases (NVD, OSV.dev), package registries, and community metrics. When a new CVE is published, a major release ships, or 维护 patterns change, Agent Memory Store's score is updated within 24 hours.

Historical trust trends reveal whether a tool is improving, stable, or declining over time. A tool that consistently maintains or improves its score demonstrates ongoing commitment to 安全性 and quality. Conversely, a downward trend may signal reduced 维护, growing technical debt, or unresolved vulnerabilities. To track Agent Memory Store's score over time, use the Nerq API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=agent-memory-store&include=history

Nerq retains trust score snapshots at regular intervals, enabling trend analysis across weeks and months. Enterprise users can access detailed historical reports showing how each dimension — 安全性, 维护, 文档, 合规性, and community — has evolved independently, providing granular visibility into which aspects of Agent Memory Store are strengthening or weakening over time.

Agent Memory Store vs 替代品

In the coding category, Agent Memory Store scores 64.9/100. There are higher-scoring alternatives available. For a detailed comparison, see:

主要结论

常见问题

Agent Memory Store安全吗?
请谨慎使用。 agent-memory-store Nerq 信任分数 64.9/100(C). 最强信号: 合规性 (100/100). 基于安全 (0/100), 维护 (1/100), 人气度 (0/100), 文档 (1/100)的评分。
Agent Memory Store的信任评分是多少?
agent-memory-store: 64.9/100 (C). 基于安全 (0/100), 维护 (1/100), 人气度 (0/100), 文档 (1/100)的评分。 Compliance: 100/100. 新数据可用时分数会更新. API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=agent-memory-store
Agent Memory Store有哪些更安全的替代品?
在Coding类别中, higher-rated alternatives include Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPT (75/100), ollama/ollama (74/100), langchain-ai/langchain (86/100). agent-memory-store scores 64.9/100.
Agent Memory Store的安全评分多久更新一次?
Nerq continuously monitors Agent Memory Store and updates its trust score as new data becomes available. Current: 64.9/100 (C), last 已验证 2026-04-21. API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=agent-memory-store
我可以在受监管的环境中使用Agent Memory Store吗?
Agent Memory Store未达到Nerq验证阈值70。建议进行额外审查。
API: /v1/preflight Trust Badge API Docs

另请参阅

Disclaimer: Nerq 信任评分是基于公开信号的自动评估。它们不构成建议或保证。请始终进行自己的验证。

我们使用Cookie进行分析和缓存。 隐私