Icons Material安全吗?
Icons Material — Nerq Trust Score 46.9/100 (D+级). 基于1个信任维度的分析,被评估为存在值得注意的安全问题。 最后更新:2026-04-28。
请对Icons Material保持警惕。 Icons Material 是一个software tool Nerq 信任分数 46.9/100(D+), 基于3个独立数据维度. 低于 Nerq 验证阈值 数据来源于多个公共来源,包括包注册表、GitHub、NVD、OSV.dev和OpenSSF Scorecard。最后更新:2026-04-28。 机器可读数据(JSON).
Icons Material安全吗?
NO — USE WITH CAUTION — Icons Material has a Nerq Trust Score of 46.9/100 (D+). 信任信号低于平均水平,存在重大缺口 in 安全性, 维护, or 文档. Not recommended for production use without thorough manual review and additional 安全性 measures.
Icons Material的信任评分是多少?
Icons Material 的 Nerq 信任分数为 46.9/100,等级为 D+。该分数基于 1 个独立测量的维度,包括安全性、维护和社区采用。
Icons Material的主要安全发现是什么?
Icons Material 最强的信号是 合规性,为 100/100。 未检测到已知漏洞。 尚未达到 Nerq 认证阈值 70+。
Icons Material是什么,谁在维护它?
| 开发者 | GitHub Actions |
| 类别 | Uncategorized |
| 来源 | https://www.npmjs.com/package/@mui/icons-material |
合规性
| EU AI Act Risk Class | Not assessed |
| Compliance Score | 100/100 |
| 管辖权s | Assessed across 52 司法管辖区s |
Icons Material在其他平台
同一开发者/公司在其他注册表中:
What Is Icons Material?
Icons Material is a software tool in the uncategorized category: Material Design icons distributed as SVG React components.. Nerq Trust Score: 47/100 (D+).
Nerq independently analyzes every software tool, app, and extension across multiple trust signals including 安全性 vulnerabilities, 维护 activity, license 合规性, and 社区采用.
How Nerq Assesses Icons Material's Safety
Nerq's Trust Score is calculated from 13+ independent signals aggregated into five 维度. Here is how Icons Material performs in each:
- Compliance (100/100): Icons Material is broadly compliant. Assessed against regulations in 52 司法管辖区s including the EU AI Act, CCPA, and GDPR.
The overall Trust Score of 46.9/100 (D+) reflects the weighted combination of these signals. This is below the Nerq Verified threshold of 70. We recommend additional due diligence before production deployment.
Who Should Use Icons Material?
Icons Material is designed for:
- Developers and teams working with uncategorized tools
- Organizations evaluating AI tools for their stack
- Researchers exploring AI capabilities in this domain
Risk guidance: We recommend caution with Icons Material. The low trust score suggests potential risks in 安全性, 维护, or community support. Consider using a more established alternative for any production or sensitive workload.
How to Verify Icons Material's Safety Yourself
While Nerq provides automated trust analysis, we recommend these additional steps before adopting any software tool:
- Check the source code — 查看 repository 安全性 policy, open issues, and recent commits for signs of active 维护.
- Scan dependencies — Use tools like
npm audit,pip-audit, orsnykto check for known vulnerabilities in Icons Material's dependency tree. - 评论 permissions — Understand what access Icons Material requires. Software tools should follow the principle of least privilege.
- Test in isolation — Run Icons Material in a sandboxed environment before granting access to production data or systems.
- Monitor continuously — Use Nerq's API to set up automated trust checks:
GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=@mui/icons-material - 查看 license — Confirm that Icons Material's license is compatible with your intended use case. Pay attention to restrictions on commercial use, redistribution, and derivative works. Some AI tools use dual licensing or have separate terms for enterprise customers that differ from the open-source license.
- Check community signals — Look at the project's issue tracker, discussion forums, and social media presence. A healthy community actively reports bugs, contributes fixes, and discusses 安全性 concerns openly. Low community engagement may indicate limited peer review of the codebase.
Common Safety Concerns with Icons Material
When evaluating whether Icons Material is safe, consider these category-specific risks:
Understand how Icons Material processes, stores, and transmits your data. 查看 tool's privacy policy and data retention practices, especially for sensitive or proprietary information.
Check Icons Material's dependency tree for known vulnerabilities. Tools with outdated or unmaintained dependencies pose a higher 安全性 risk.
Regularly check for updates to Icons Material. 安全性 patches and bug fixes are only effective if you're running the latest version.
If Icons Material connects to external APIs or services, each integration point is a potential attack surface. Audit all third-party connections, verify that data shared with external services is minimized, and ensure that integration credentials are rotated regularly.
Verify that Icons Material's license is compatible with your intended use case. Some AI tools have restrictive licenses that limit commercial use, redistribution, or derivative works. Using Icons Material in violation of its license can expose your organization to legal liability.
Best Practices for Using Icons Material Safely
Whether you're an individual developer or an enterprise team, these practices will help you get the most from Icons Material while minimizing risk:
Periodically review how Icons Material is used in your workflow. Check for unexpected behavior, permissions drift, and 合规性 with your 安全性 policies.
Ensure Icons Material and all its dependencies are running the latest stable versions to benefit from 安全性 patches.
Grant Icons Material only the minimum permissions it needs to function. Avoid granting admin or root access.
Subscribe to Icons Material's 安全性 advisories and vulnerability disclosures. Use Nerq's API to get automated trust score updates.
Create and maintain a clear policy for how Icons Material is used within your organization, including data handling guidelines and acceptable use cases.
When Should You Avoid Icons Material?
Even promising tools aren't right for every situation. Consider avoiding Icons Material in these scenarios:
- Production environments handling sensitive customer data
- Regulated industries (healthcare, finance, government) without additional 合规性 review
- Mission-critical systems where downtime has significant business impact
For each scenario, evaluate whether Icons Material's trust score of 46.9/100 meets your organization's risk tolerance. We recommend running a manual 安全性 assessment alongside the automated Nerq score.
How Icons Material Compares to Industry Standards
Nerq indexes over 6 million software tools, apps, and packages across dozens of categories. Among uncategorized tools, the average Trust Score is 62/100. Icons Material's score of 46.9/100 is below the category average of 62/100.
This suggests that Icons Material trails behind many comparable uncategorized tools. Organizations with strict 安全性 requirements should evaluate whether higher-scoring alternatives better meet their needs.
Industry benchmarks matter because they contextualize a tool's safety profile. A score that looks 中等 in isolation may actually represent strong performance within a challenging category — or vice versa. Nerq's category-relative analysis helps teams make informed decisions by showing not just absolute quality, but how a tool ranks against its direct peers.
Trust Score History
Nerq continuously monitors Icons Material and recalculates its Trust Score as new data becomes available. Our scoring engine ingests real-time signals from source repositories, vulnerability databases (NVD, OSV.dev), package registries, and community metrics. When a new CVE is published, a major release ships, or 维护 patterns change, Icons Material's score is updated within 24 hours.
Historical trust trends reveal whether a tool is improving, stable, or declining over time. A tool that consistently maintains or improves its score demonstrates ongoing commitment to 安全性 and quality. Conversely, a downward trend may signal reduced 维护, growing technical debt, or unresolved vulnerabilities. To track Icons Material's score over time, use the Nerq API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=@mui/icons-material&include=history
Nerq retains trust score snapshots at regular intervals, enabling trend analysis across weeks and months. Enterprise users can access detailed historical reports showing how each dimension — 安全性, 维护, 文档, 合规性, and community — has evolved independently, providing granular visibility into which aspects of Icons Material are strengthening or weakening over time.
主要结论
- Icons Material has a Trust Score of 46.9/100 (D+) and is not yet Nerq Verified.
- Icons Material has significant trust gaps. Consider higher-rated alternatives unless specific requirements mandate its use.
- Among uncategorized tools, Icons Material scores below the category average of 62/100, suggesting room for improvement relative to peers.
- Always verify safety independently — use Nerq's Preflight API for automated, up-to-date trust checks before integration.
Icons Material收集哪些数据?
隐私 assessment for Icons Material is not yet available. See our methodology for how Nerq measures privacy, or the public privacy review for any community-contributed notes.
Icons Material安全吗?
安全分数: 正在评估中. Review 安全性 practices and consider alternatives with higher 安全性 scores for sensitive use cases.
Nerq 对照 NVD、OSV.dev 和注册表特定漏洞数据库监控此实体 以进行持续安全评估.
完整分析: Icons Material安全报告
Icons Material在其他平台
同一开发者/公司在其他注册表中:
我们如何计算此评分
Icons Material's trust score of 46.9/100 (D+) 由以下内容计算得出 多个公共来源,包括包注册表、GitHub、NVD、OSV.dev和OpenSSF Scorecard. 该评分反映了 0 独立维度: . 每个维度被同等加权以产生综合信任评分.
Nerq 在 26 个注册表中分析超过 750 万个实体 使用相同的方法,实现实体间的直接比较. 评分会在新数据可用时持续更新.
本页面最近审查于 April 28, 2026. 数据版本: 1.0.
常见问题
Icons Material安全吗?
Icons Material的信任评分是多少?
Icons Material有哪些更安全的替代品?
Icons Material的安全评分多久更新一次?
我可以在受监管的环境中使用Icons Material吗?
另请参阅
Disclaimer: Nerq 信任评分是基于公开信号的自动评估。它们不构成建议或保证。请始终进行自己的验证。