Humanlayer安全吗?

Humanlayer — Nerq 信任评分 55.2/100 (D级). 基于4个信任维度的分析,被评估为存在值得注意的安全问题。 最后更新:2026-04-02。

请谨慎使用Humanlayer。 Humanlayer is a software tool Nerq 信任评分为 55.2/100 (D), based on 4 independent data dimensions. 低于推荐阈值 70。 Maintenance: 0/100. Popularity: 0/100. Data sourced from multiple public sources including package registries, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev, and OpenSSF Scorecard. Last updated: 2026-04-02. 机器可读数据(JSON).

Humanlayer安全吗?

谨慎 — Humanlayer Nerq 信任评分为 55.2/100 (D). 信任信号中等,但存在一些值得关注的方面. 适合用于开发环境 — 在生产部署前请查看安全性和维护信号.

安全分析 → {name}隐私报告 →

Humanlayer的信任评分是多少?

Humanlayer Nerq 信任评分为 55.2/100, earning a D grade. This score is based on 4 independently measured dimensions including security, maintenance, and community adoption.

合规性
100
维护
0
文档
0
人气
0

Humanlayer的主要安全发现是什么?

Humanlayer's strongest signal is 合规性 at 100/100. No 已知漏洞 have been detected. It has not yet reached the Nerq Verified threshold of 70+.

Maintenance: 0/100 — low maintenance activity
Compliance: 100/100 — covers 52 of 52 jurisdictions
Documentation: 0/100 — limited documentation
Popularity: 0/100 — community adoption

Humanlayer是什么,谁在维护它?

开发者dexhorthy-humanlayer
类别command-line
来源https://www.npmjs.com/package/humanlayer

合规性

EU AI Act Risk ClassNot assessed
Compliance Score100/100
JurisdictionsAssessed across 52 jurisdictions

Humanlayer在其他平台

同一开发者/公司在其他注册表中:

@humanlayer/sdk
48/100 · npm
humanlayer-vercel-ai-sdk
48/100 · npm

What Is Humanlayer?

Humanlayer is a software tool in the command-line category: HumanLayer for command-line tasks.. Nerq 信任评分: 55/100 (D).

Nerq independently analyzes every software tool, app, and extension across multiple trust signals including security vulnerabilities, maintenance activity, license compliance, and community adoption.

How Nerq Assesses Humanlayer's Safety

Nerq's 信任评分 is calculated from 13+ independent signals aggregated into five dimensions. Here is how Humanlayer performs in each:

The overall 信任评分 of 55.2/100 (D) reflects the weighted combination of these signals. This is below the Nerq Verified threshold of 70. We recommend additional due diligence before production deployment.

Who Should Use Humanlayer?

Humanlayer is designed for:

Risk guidance: Humanlayer is suitable for development and testing environments. Before production deployment, conduct a thorough review of its security posture, review the specific trust signals above, and consider whether a higher-scored alternative meets your requirements.

How to Verify Humanlayer's Safety Yourself

While Nerq provides automated trust analysis, we recommend these additional steps before adopting any software tool:

  1. Check the source code — Review the repository security policy, open issues, and recent commits for signs of active maintenance.
  2. Scan dependencies — Use tools like npm audit, pip-audit, or snyk to check for 已知漏洞 in Humanlayer's dependency tree.
  3. 评论 permissions — Understand what access Humanlayer requires. Software tools should follow the principle of least privilege.
  4. Test in isolation — Run Humanlayer in a sandboxed environment before granting access to production data or systems.
  5. Monitor continuously — Use Nerq's API to set up automated trust checks: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=humanlayer
  6. 查看 license — Confirm that Humanlayer's license is compatible with your intended use case. Pay attention to restrictions on commercial use, redistribution, and derivative works. Some AI tools use dual licensing or have separate terms for enterprise customers that differ from the open-source license.
  7. Check community signals — Look at the project's issue tracker, discussion forums, and social media presence. A healthy community actively reports bugs, contributes fixes, and discusses security concerns openly. Low community engagement may indicate limited peer review of the codebase.

Common Safety Concerns with Humanlayer

When evaluating whether Humanlayer is safe, consider these category-specific risks:

Data handling

Understand how Humanlayer processes, stores, and transmits your data. Review the tool's privacy policy and data retention practices, especially for sensitive or proprietary information.

Dependency security

Check Humanlayer's dependency tree for 已知漏洞. Tools with outdated or unmaintained dependencies pose a higher security risk.

Update frequency

Regularly check for updates to Humanlayer. Security patches and bug fixes are only effective if you're running the latest version.

Third-party integrations

If Humanlayer connects to external APIs or services, each integration point is a potential attack surface. Audit all third-party connections, verify that data shared with external services is minimized, and ensure that integration credentials are rotated regularly.

License and IP compliance

Verify that Humanlayer's license is compatible with your intended use case. Some AI tools have restrictive licenses that limit commercial use, redistribution, or derivative works. Using Humanlayer in violation of its license can expose your organization to legal liability.

Best Practices for Using Humanlayer Safely

Whether you're an individual developer or an enterprise team, these practices will help you get the most from Humanlayer while minimizing risk:

Conduct regular audits

Periodically review how Humanlayer is used in your workflow. Check for unexpected behavior, permissions drift, and compliance with your security policies.

Keep dependencies updated

Ensure Humanlayer and all its dependencies are running the latest stable versions to benefit from security patches.

Follow least privilege

Grant Humanlayer only the minimum permissions it needs to function. Avoid granting admin or root access.

Monitor for security advisories

Subscribe to Humanlayer's security advisories and vulnerability disclosures. Use Nerq's API to get automated trust score updates.

Document usage policies

Create and maintain a clear policy for how Humanlayer is used within your organization, including data handling guidelines and acceptable use cases.

When Should You Avoid Humanlayer?

Even promising tools aren't right for every situation. Consider avoiding Humanlayer in these scenarios:

For each scenario, evaluate whether Humanlayer的信任评分为 55.2/100 meets your organization's risk tolerance. We recommend running a manual security assessment alongside the automated Nerq score.

How Humanlayer Compares to Industry Standards

Nerq indexes over 6 million software tools, apps, and packages across dozens of categories. Among command-line tools, the average 信任评分 is 62/100. Humanlayer's score of 55.2/100 is near the category average of 62/100.

This places Humanlayer in line with the typical command-line tool tool. It meets baseline expectations but does not distinguish itself from peers on trust metrics.

Industry benchmarks matter because they contextualize a tool's safety profile. A score that looks moderate in isolation may actually represent strong performance within a challenging category — or vice versa. Nerq's category-relative analysis helps teams make informed decisions by showing not just absolute quality, but how a tool ranks against its direct peers.

信任评分 History

Nerq continuously monitors Humanlayer and recalculates its 信任评分 as new data becomes available. Our scoring engine ingests real-time signals from source repositories, vulnerability databases (NVD, OSV.dev), package registries, and community metrics. When a new CVE is published, a major release ships, or maintenance patterns change, Humanlayer's score is updated within 24 hours.

Historical trust trends reveal whether a tool is improving, stable, or declining over time. A tool that consistently maintains or improves its score demonstrates ongoing commitment to security and quality. Conversely, a downward trend may signal reduced maintenance, growing technical debt, or unresolved vulnerabilities. To track Humanlayer's score over time, use the Nerq API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=humanlayer&include=history

Nerq retains trust score snapshots at regular intervals, enabling trend analysis across weeks and months. Enterprise users can access detailed historical reports showing how each dimension — security, maintenance, documentation, compliance, and community — has evolved independently, providing granular visibility into which aspects of Humanlayer are strengthening or weakening over time.

主要结论

常见问题

Humanlayer可以安全使用吗?
请谨慎使用。 humanlayer Nerq 信任评分为 55.2/100 (D). 最强信号: 合规性 (100/100). 评分基于 maintenance (0/100), popularity (0/100), documentation (0/100).
Humanlayer's trust score是什么?
humanlayer: 55.2/100 (D). 评分基于: maintenance (0/100), popularity (0/100), documentation (0/100). Compliance: 100/100. 评分会在新数据可用时更新。 API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=humanlayer
Humanlayer有哪些更安全的替代品?
In the command-line category, more software tools are being analyzed — 请稍后再查看. humanlayer scores 55.2/100.
How often is Humanlayer's safety score updated?
Nerq continuously monitors Humanlayer and updates its trust score as new data becomes available. Data sourced from multiple public sources including package registries, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev, and OpenSSF Scorecard. Current: 55.2/100 (D), last verified 2026-04-02. API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=humanlayer
我可以在受监管环境中使用Humanlayer吗?
Humanlayer has not reached the Nerq Verified threshold of 70. Additional due diligence is recommended for regulated environments.
API: /v1/preflight Trust Badge API Docs

Disclaimer: Nerq 信任评分是基于公开信号的自动评估。它们不构成建议或保证。请始终进行自己的验证。

We use cookies for analytics and caching. 隐私 Policy