Er Smartbuilder sikker?
Smartbuilder — Nerq Tillidsscore 66.9/100 (Karakter C). Baseret på analyse af 5 tillidsdimensioner vurderes det som generelt sikkert men med visse bekymringer. Sidst opdateret: 2026-04-02.
Brug Smartbuilder med forsigtighed. Smartbuilder is a software tool with a Nerq Tillidsscore of 66.9/100 (C), based on 5 uafhængige datadimensioner. Det er under den anbefalede tærskel på 70. Sikkerhed: 0/100. Vedligeholdelse: 1/100. Popularity: 0/100. Data hentet fra multiple public sources including package registries, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev, and OpenSSF Scorecard. Sidst opdateret: 2026-04-02. Maskinlæsbare data (JSON).
Er Smartbuilder sikker?
FORSIGTIGHED — Smartbuilder has a Nerq Tillidsscore of 66.9/100 (C). Har moderat tillidssignaler, men viser nogle bekymrende områder, der kræver opmærksomhed. Egnet til udviklingsformål — gennemgå sikkerheds- og vedligeholdelsessignaler før produktionsimplementering.
Hvad er Smartbuilders tillidsscore?
Smartbuilder has a Nerq Tillidsscore of 66.9/100, earning a C grade. This score is based on 5 independently measured dimensioner including sikkerhed, vedligeholdelse, and fællesskabsadoption.
Hvad er de vigtigste sikkerhedsresultater for Smartbuilder?
Smartbuilder's strongest signal is overholdelse at 87/100. No known vulnerabilities have been detected. It has not yet reached the Nerq Verified threshold of 70+.
Hvad er Smartbuilder og hvem vedligeholder det?
| Udvikler | Koreayush |
| Kategori | coding |
| Kilde | https://github.com/Koreayush/SmartBuilder |
| Frameworks | langchain |
| Protocols | rest |
Lovgivningsmæssig overholdelse
| EU AI Act Risk Class | MINIMAL |
| Compliance Score | 87/100 |
| Jurisdictions | Assessed across 52 jurisdictions |
Populære alternativer i coding
What Is Smartbuilder?
Smartbuilder is a software tool in the coding category: SmartBuilder is an intelligent AI coding assistant that transforms natural language project ideas into fully structured, production-ready codebases.. Nerq Tillidsscore: 67/100 (C).
Nerq independently analyzes every software tool, app, and extension across multiple trust signals including sikkerhed vulnerabilities, vedligeholdelse activity, license overholdelse, and fællesskabsadoption.
How Nerq Assesses Smartbuilder's Safety
Nerq's Tillidsscore is calculated from 13+ independent signals aggregated into five dimensioner. Here is how Smartbuilder performs in each:
- Sikkerhed (0/100): Smartbuilder's sikkerhed posture is poor. This score factors in known CVEs, dependency vulnerabilities, sikkerhed policy presence, and code signing practices.
- Vedligeholdelse (1/100): Smartbuilder is potentially abandoned. We track commit frequency, release cadence, issue response times, and PR merge rates.
- Documentation (1/100): Documentation quality is insufficient. This includes README completeness, API dokumentation, usage examples, and contribution guidelines.
- Compliance (87/100): Smartbuilder is broadly compliant. Assessed against regulations in 52 jurisdictions including the EU AI Act, CCPA, and GDPR.
- Community (0/100): Community adoption is limited. Baseret på GitHub stars, forks, download counts, and ecosystem integrations.
The overall Tillidsscore of 66.9/100 (C) reflects the weighted combination of these signals. This is below the Nerq Verified threshold of 70. We recommend additional due diligence before production deployment.
Who Should Use Smartbuilder?
Smartbuilder is designed for:
- Developers and teams working with coding tools
- Organizations evaluating AI tools for their stack
- Researchers exploring AI capabilities in this domain
Risk guidance: Smartbuilder is suitable for development and testing environments. Before production deployment, conduct a thorough review of its sikkerhed posture, review the specific trust signals above, and consider whether a higher-scored alternative meets your requirements.
How to Verify Smartbuilder's Safety Yourself
While Nerq provides automated trust analysis, we recommend these additional steps before adopting any software tool:
- Check the source code — Gennemgå repository's sikkerhed policy, open issues, and recent commits for signs of active vedligeholdelse.
- Scan dependencies — Use tools like
npm audit,pip-audit, orsnykto check for known vulnerabilities in Smartbuilder's dependency tree. - Anmeldelse permissions — Understand what access Smartbuilder requires. Software tools should follow the principle of least privilege.
- Test in isolation — Run Smartbuilder in a sandboxed environment before granting access to production data or systems.
- Monitor continuously — Use Nerq's API to set up automated trust checks:
GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=SmartBuilder - Gennemgå license — Confirm that Smartbuilder's license is compatible with your intended use case. Pay attention to restrictions on commercial use, redistribution, and derivative works. Some AI tools use dual licensing or have separate terms for enterprise customers that differ from the open-source license.
- Check community signals — Look at the project's issue tracker, discussion forums, and social media presence. A healthy community actively reports bugs, contributes fixes, and discusses sikkerhed concerns openly. Low community engagement may indicate limited peer review of the codebase.
Common Safety Concerns with Smartbuilder
When evaluating whether Smartbuilder is safe, consider these category-specific risks:
Understand how Smartbuilder processes, stores, and transmits your data. Gennemgå tool's privacy policy and data retention practices, especially for sensitive or proprietary information.
Check Smartbuilder's dependency tree for known vulnerabilities. Tools with outdated or unmaintained dependencies pose a higher sikkerhed risk.
Regularly check for updates to Smartbuilder. Sikkerhed patches and bug fixes are only effective if you're running the latest version.
If Smartbuilder connects to external APIs or services, each integration point is a potential attack surface. Audit all third-party connections, verify that data shared with external services is minimized, and ensure that integration credentials are rotated regularly.
Verify that Smartbuilder's license is compatible with your intended use case. Some AI tools have restrictive licenses that limit commercial use, redistribution, or derivative works. Using Smartbuilder in violation of its license can expose your organization to legal liability.
Smartbuilder and the EU AI Act
Smartbuilder is classified as Minimal Risk under the EU AI Act. This is the lowest risk category, meaning it faces minimal regulatory requirements. However, transparency obligations still apply.
Nerq's overholdelse assessment covers 52 jurisdictions worldwide. For organizations deploying AI tools in regulated environments, understanding these classifications is essential for legal overholdelse.
Best Practices for Using Smartbuilder Safely
Whether you're an individual developer or an enterprise team, these practices will help you get the most from Smartbuilder while minimizing risk:
Periodically review how Smartbuilder is used in your workflow. Check for unexpected behavior, permissions drift, and overholdelse with your sikkerhed policies.
Ensure Smartbuilder and all its dependencies are running the latest stable versions to benefit from sikkerhed patches.
Grant Smartbuilder only the minimum permissions it needs to function. Avoid granting admin or root access.
Subscribe to Smartbuilder's sikkerhed advisories and vulnerability disclosures. Use Nerq's API to get automated trust score updates.
Create and maintain a clear policy for how Smartbuilder is used within your organization, including data handling guidelines and acceptable use cases.
When Should You Avoid Smartbuilder?
Even promising tools aren't right for every situation. Consider avoiding Smartbuilder in these scenarios:
- Production environments handling sensitive customer data
- Regulated industries (healthcare, finance, government) without additional overholdelse review
- Mission-critical systems where downtime has significant business impact
For each scenario, evaluate whether Smartbuilder 66.9/100 meets your organization's risk tolerance. We recommend running a manual sikkerhed assessment alongside the automated Nerq score.
How Smartbuilder Compares to Industry Standards
Nerq indexes over 6 million software tools, apps, and packages across dozens of categories. Among coding tools, the average Tillidsscore is 62/100. Smartbuilder's score of 66.9/100 is above the category average of 62/100.
This positions Smartbuilder favorably among coding tools. While it outperforms the average, there is still room for improvement in certain trust dimensioner.
Industry benchmarks matter because they contextualize a tool's safety profile. A score that looks moderat in isolation may actually represent strong performance within a challenging category — or vice versa. Nerq's category-relative analysis helps teams make informed decisions by showing not just absolute quality, but how a tool ranks against its direct peers.
Tillidsscore History
Nerq continuously monitors Smartbuilder and recalculates its Tillidsscore as new data becomes available. Our scoring engine ingests real-time signals from source repositories, vulnerability databases (NVD, OSV.dev), package registries, and community metrics. When a new CVE is published, a major release ships, or vedligeholdelse patterns change, Smartbuilder's score is updated within 24 hours.
Historical trust trends reveal whether a tool is improving, stable, or declining over time. A tool that consistently maintains or improves its score demonstrates ongoing commitment to sikkerhed and quality. Conversely, a downward trend may signal reduced vedligeholdelse, growing technical debt, or unresolved vulnerabilities. To track Smartbuilder's score over time, use the Nerq API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=SmartBuilder&include=history
Nerq retains trust score snapshots at regular intervals, enabling trend analysis across weeks and months. Enterprise users can access detailed historical reports showing how each dimension — sikkerhed, vedligeholdelse, dokumentation, overholdelse, and community — has evolved independently, providing granular visibility into which aspects of Smartbuilder are strengthening or weakening over time.
Smartbuilder vs Alternativer
I coding-kategorien, Smartbuilder scorer 66.9/100. There are higher-scoring alternatives available. For a detailed comparison, see:
- Smartbuilder vs AutoGPT — Tillidsscore: 74.7/100
- Smartbuilder vs ollama — Tillidsscore: 73.8/100
- Smartbuilder vs langchain — Tillidsscore: 86.4/100
Vigtigste pointer
- Smartbuilder has a Tillidsscore of 66.9/100 (C) and is not yet Nerq Verified.
- Smartbuilder shows moderat trust signals. Conduct thorough due diligence before deploying to production environments.
- Among coding tools, Smartbuilder scores above the category average of 62/100, demonstrating above-average reliability.
- Always verify safety independently — use Nerq's Preflight API for automated, up-to-date trust checks before integration.
Ofte stillede spørgsmål
Er Smartbuilder sikker at bruge?
Hvad er tillidsscoren for Smartbuilder?
Hvad er sikrere alternativer til Smartbuilder?
How often is Smartbuilder's safety score updated?
Kan jeg bruge Smartbuilder i et reguleret miljø?
Disclaimer: Nerqs tillidsscorer er automatiserede vurderinger baseret på offentligt tilgængelige signaler. De udgør ikke anbefalinger eller garantier. Foretag altid din egen verificering.