Er Dot Pi sikker?
Dot Pi — Nerq Tillidsscore 74.7/100 (Karakter B). Baseret på analyse af 5 tillidsdimensioner vurderes det som generelt sikkert men med visse bekymringer. Sidst opdateret: 2026-04-05.
Ja, Dot Pi er sikker at bruge. Dot Pi er en software tool with a Nerq Tillidsscore of 74.7/100 (B), based on 5 uafhængige datadimensioner. It is recommended for use. Sikkerhed: 0/100. Vedligeholdelse: 1/100. Popularitet: 0/100. Data hentet fra multiple public sources including package registries, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev, and OpenSSF Scorecard. Sidst opdateret: 2026-04-05. Maskinlæsbare data (JSON).
Er Dot Pi sikker?
JA — Dot Pi has a Nerq Tillidsscore of 74.7/100 (B). Opfylder Nerqs tillidstærskel med stærke signaler inden for sikkerhed, vedligeholdelse og fællesskabsadoption. Recommended for use — gennemgå den fulde rapport nedenfor for specifikke overvejelser.
Hvad er Dot Pis tillidsscore?
Dot Pi har en Nerq Tillidsscore på 74.7/100 med karakteren B. Denne score er baseret på 5 uafhængigt målte dimensioner, herunder sikkerhed, vedligeholdelse og community-adoption.
Hvad er de vigtigste sikkerhedsresultater for Dot Pi?
Dot Pis stærkeste signal er overholdelse på 100/100. Ingen kendte sårbarheder er fundet. It meets the Nerq Verified threshold of 70+.
Hvad er Dot Pi og hvem vedligeholder det?
| Udvikler | dannote |
| Kategori | coding |
| Stjerner | 10 |
| Kilde | https://github.com/dannote/dot-pi |
| Frameworks | anthropic |
| Protocols | mcp · rest |
Lovgivningsmæssig overholdelse
| EU AI Act Risk Class | MINIMAL |
| Compliance Score | 100/100 |
| Jurisdictions | Assessed across 52 jurisdictions |
Populære alternativer i coding
Dot Pi på andre platforme
Samme udvikler/virksomhed i andre registre:
What Is Dot Pi?
Dot Pi is a software tool in the coding category: Extensions and skills for the Pi coding agent.. It has 10 GitHub stars. Nerq Tillidsscore: 75/100 (B).
Nerq independently analyzes every software tool, app, and extension across multiple trust signals including sikkerhed vulnerabilities, vedligeholdelse activity, license overholdelse, and fællesskabsadoption.
How Nerq Assesses Dot Pi's Safety
Nerq's Tillidsscore is calculated from 13+ independent signals aggregated into five dimensioner. Here is how Dot Pi performs in each:
- Sikkerhed (0/100): Dot Pi's sikkerhed posture is poor. This score factors in known CVEs, dependency vulnerabilities, sikkerhed policy presence, and code signing practices.
- Vedligeholdelse (1/100): Dot Pi is potentially abandoned. We track commit frequency, release cadence, issue response times, and PR merge rates.
- Documentation (1/100): Documentation quality is insufficient. This includes README completeness, API dokumentation, usage examples, and contribution guidelines.
- Compliance (100/100): Dot Pi is broadly compliant. Assessed against regulations in 52 jurisdictions including the EU AI Act, CCPA, and GDPR.
- Community (0/100): Community adoption is limited. Baseret på GitHub stars, forks, download counts, and ecosystem integrations.
The overall Tillidsscore of 74.7/100 (B) reflects the weighted combination of these signals. This exceeds the Nerq Verified threshold of 70, indicating the tool meets our standards for production use.
Who Should Use Dot Pi?
Dot Pi is designed for:
- Developers and teams working with coding tools
- Organizations evaluating AI tools for their stack
- Researchers exploring AI capabilities in this domain
Risk guidance: Dot Pi meets the minimum threshold for production use, but we recommend monitoring for sikkerhed advisories and keeping dependencies up to date. Consider implementing additional guardrails for sensitive workloads.
How to Verify Dot Pi's Safety Yourself
While Nerq provides automated trust analysis, we recommend these additional steps before adopting any software tool:
- Check the source code — Gennemgå repository's sikkerhed policy, open issues, and recent commits for signs of active vedligeholdelse.
- Scan dependencies — Use tools like
npm audit,pip-audit, orsnykto check for known vulnerabilities in Dot Pi's dependency tree. - Anmeldelse permissions — Understand what access Dot Pi requires. Software tools should follow the principle of least privilege.
- Test in isolation — Run Dot Pi in a sandboxed environment before granting access to production data or systems.
- Monitor continuously — Use Nerq's API to set up automated trust checks:
GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=dot-pi - Gennemgå license — Confirm that Dot Pi's license is compatible with your intended use case. Pay attention to restrictions on commercial use, redistribution, and derivative works. Some AI tools use dual licensing or have separate terms for enterprise customers that differ from the open-source license.
- Check community signals — Look at the project's issue tracker, discussion forums, and social media presence. A healthy community actively reports bugs, contributes fixes, and discusses sikkerhed concerns openly. Low community engagement may indicate limited peer review of the codebase.
Common Safety Concerns with Dot Pi
When evaluating whether Dot Pi is safe, consider these category-specific risks:
Understand how Dot Pi processes, stores, and transmits your data. Gennemgå tool's privacy policy and data retention practices, especially for sensitive or proprietary information.
Check Dot Pi's dependency tree for known vulnerabilities. Tools with outdated or unmaintained dependencies pose a higher sikkerhed risk.
Regularly check for updates to Dot Pi. Sikkerhed patches and bug fixes are only effective if you're running the latest version.
If Dot Pi connects to external APIs or services, each integration point is a potential attack surface. Audit all third-party connections, verify that data shared with external services is minimized, and ensure that integration credentials are rotated regularly.
Verify that Dot Pi's license is compatible with your intended use case. Some AI tools have restrictive licenses that limit commercial use, redistribution, or derivative works. Using Dot Pi in violation of its license can expose your organization to legal liability.
Dot Pi and the EU AI Act
Dot Pi is classified as Minimal Risk under the EU AI Act. This is the lowest risk category, meaning it faces minimal regulatory requirements. However, transparency obligations still apply.
Nerq's overholdelse assessment covers 52 jurisdictions worldwide. For organizations deploying AI tools in regulated environments, understanding these classifications is essential for legal overholdelse.
Best Practices for Using Dot Pi Safely
Whether you're an individual developer or an enterprise team, these practices will help you get the most from Dot Pi while minimizing risk:
Periodically review how Dot Pi is used in your workflow. Check for unexpected behavior, permissions drift, and overholdelse with your sikkerhed policies.
Ensure Dot Pi and all its dependencies are running the latest stable versions to benefit from sikkerhed patches.
Grant Dot Pi only the minimum permissions it needs to function. Avoid granting admin or root access.
Subscribe to Dot Pi's sikkerhed advisories and vulnerability disclosures. Use Nerq's API to get automated trust score updates.
Create and maintain a clear policy for how Dot Pi is used within your organization, including data handling guidelines and acceptable use cases.
When Should You Avoid Dot Pi?
Even well-trusted tools aren't right for every situation. Consider avoiding Dot Pi in these scenarios:
- Scenarios where Dot Pi's specific capabilities exceed your actual needs — simpler tools may be safer
- Air-gapped environments where the tool cannot receive sikkerhed updates
- Projects with strict regulatory requirements that haven't been explicitly validated
For each scenario, evaluate whether Dot Pi 74.7/100 meets your organization's risk tolerance. The Nerq Verified status indicates general production readiness, but sector-specific requirements may apply.
How Dot Pi Compares to Industry Standards
Nerq indexes over 6 million software tools, apps, and packages across dozens of categories. Among coding tools, the average Tillidsscore is 62/100. Dot Pi's score of 74.7/100 is significantly above the category average of 62/100.
This places Dot Pi in the top tier of coding tools that Nerq tracks. Tools scoring this far above average typically demonstrate mature sikkerhed practices, consistent release cadence, and broad fællesskabsadoption.
Industry benchmarks matter because they contextualize a tool's safety profile. A score that looks moderat in isolation may actually represent strong performance within a challenging category — or vice versa. Nerq's category-relative analysis helps teams make informed decisions by showing not just absolute quality, but how a tool ranks against its direct peers.
Tillidsscore History
Nerq continuously monitors Dot Pi and recalculates its Tillidsscore as new data becomes available. Our scoring engine ingests real-time signals from source repositories, vulnerability databases (NVD, OSV.dev), package registries, and community metrics. When a new CVE is published, a major release ships, or vedligeholdelse patterns change, Dot Pi's score is updated within 24 hours.
Historical trust trends reveal whether a tool is improving, stable, or declining over time. A tool that consistently maintains or improves its score demonstrates ongoing commitment to sikkerhed and quality. Conversely, a downward trend may signal reduced vedligeholdelse, growing technical debt, or unresolved vulnerabilities. To track Dot Pi's score over time, use the Nerq API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=dot-pi&include=history
Nerq retains trust score snapshots at regular intervals, enabling trend analysis across weeks and months. Enterprise users can access detailed historical reports showing how each dimension — sikkerhed, vedligeholdelse, dokumentation, overholdelse, and community — has evolved independently, providing granular visibility into which aspects of Dot Pi are strengthening or weakening over time.
Dot Pi vs Alternativer
I coding-kategorien, Dot Pi scorer 74.7/100. There are higher-scoring alternatives available. For a detailed comparison, see:
- Dot Pi vs AutoGPT — Tillidsscore: 74.7/100
- Dot Pi vs ollama — Tillidsscore: 73.8/100
- Dot Pi vs langchain — Tillidsscore: 86.4/100
Vigtigste pointer
- Dot Pi has a Tillidsscore of 74.7/100 (B) and is Nerq Verified.
- Dot Pi meets the minimum threshold for production deployment, though monitoring and additional guardrails are recommended.
- Among coding tools, Dot Pi scores significantly above the category average of 62/100, demonstrating above-average reliability.
- Always verify safety independently — use Nerq's Preflight API for automated, up-to-date trust checks before integration.
Ofte stillede spørgsmål
Er Dot Pi sikker at bruge?
Hvad er tillidsscoren for Dot Pi?
Hvad er sikrere alternativer til Dot Pi?
How often is Dot Pi's safety score updated?
Kan jeg bruge Dot Pi i et reguleret miljø?
Disclaimer: Nerqs tillidsscorer er automatiserede vurderinger baseret på offentligt tilgængelige signaler. De udgør ikke anbefalinger eller garantier. Foretag altid din egen verificering.