Is Igv Safe?
Igv — Nerq Trust Score 53.5/100 (C- grade). Score based on 2 independent trust signals. Last analyzed: 2026-03-22
Igv is a Homebrew formula with a Nerq Trust Score of 53.5/100 (C-), based on 3 independent data dimensions. Last analyzed: 2026-03-22 Security: 90/100. Popularity: 15/100. Data sourced from Homebrew formulae database and GitHub (homebrew-core). Last updated: 2026-03-22. Machine-readable data (JSON).
Is Igv safe?
Trust Score Breakdown — Igv has a Nerq Trust Score of 53.5/100 (C-). Measured across 2 independent trust signals (as of 2026-03-22).
What is Igv's trust score?
Igv has a Nerq Trust Score of 53.5/100, earning a C- grade. This score is based on 2 independently measured dimensions including security, maintenance, and community adoption.
What are the key security findings for Igv?
Igv's strongest signal is security at 90/100. No known vulnerabilities have been detected.
What is Igv and who maintains it?
| Author | Unknown |
| Category | Homebrew |
| Source | N/A |
Similar Homebrew by Trust Score
Safety Guide: Igv
What is Igv?
Igv is a Homebrew formula — Interactive Genomics Viewer.
How to Verify Safety
Homebrew formulas are community-reviewed. Check formulae.brew.sh.
You can also check the trust score via API: GET /v1/preflight?target=igv
Key Safety Concerns for Homebrew formula
When evaluating any Homebrew formula, watch for: source build integrity, dependency chain.
Measured Signals
Igv has a Nerq Trust Score of 54/100 (C-). This score is a composite of automated measurements of security, maintenance, community, and quality signals.
Key Takeaways
- Igv has a Trust Score of 54/100 (C-).
- The score is a measured composite — it is not a suitability judgment. Evaluate the individual signals against your own requirements.
- Query the current measured values via the Nerq API.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Igv Safe?
What is Igv's trust score?
What are safer alternatives to Igv?
Is Igv actively maintained?
How was Igv reviewed?
Popular in Homebrew
See Also
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated measurements based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements, verdicts, or guarantees of suitability. Always evaluate the signals against your own requirements.