Is Jd Safe?
Jd — Nerq Trust Score 58.0/100 (C grade). Score based on 2 independent trust signals. Last analyzed: 2026-03-22
Jd is a Homebrew formula with a Nerq Trust Score of 58.0/100 (C), based on 3 independent data dimensions. Last analyzed: 2026-03-22 Security: 90/100. Popularity: 45/100. Data sourced from Homebrew formulae database and GitHub (homebrew-core). Last updated: 2026-03-22. Machine-readable data (JSON).
Is Jd safe?
Trust Score Breakdown — Jd has a Nerq Trust Score of 58.0/100 (C). Measured across 2 independent trust signals (as of 2026-03-22).
What is Jd's trust score?
Jd has a Nerq Trust Score of 58.0/100, earning a C grade. This score is based on 2 independently measured dimensions including security, maintenance, and community adoption.
What are the key security findings for Jd?
Jd's strongest signal is security at 90/100. No known vulnerabilities have been detected.
What is Jd and who maintains it?
| Author | Unknown |
| Category | Homebrew |
| Source | N/A |
Similar Homebrew by Trust Score
Compare
Safety Guide: Jd
What is Jd?
Jd is a Homebrew formula — JSON diff and patch.
How to Verify Safety
Homebrew formulas are community-reviewed. Check formulae.brew.sh.
You can also check the trust score via API: GET /v1/preflight?target=jd
Key Safety Concerns for Homebrew formula
When evaluating any Homebrew formula, watch for: source build integrity, dependency chain.
Measured Signals
Jd has a Nerq Trust Score of 58/100 (C). This score is a composite of automated measurements of security, maintenance, community, and quality signals.
Key Takeaways
- Jd has a Trust Score of 58/100 (C).
- The score is a measured composite — it is not a suitability judgment. Evaluate the individual signals against your own requirements.
- Query the current measured values via the Nerq API.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Jd Safe?
What is Jd's trust score?
What are safer alternatives to Jd?
Is Jd actively maintained?
How was Jd reviewed?
Popular in Homebrew
See Also
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated measurements based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements, verdicts, or guarantees of suitability. Always evaluate the signals against your own requirements.