Is [email protected] Safe?
[email protected] — Nerq Trust Score 54.8/100 (C- grade). Based on analysis of 2 trust dimensions, it is has notable safety concerns. Last updated: 2026-04-03.
Use [email protected] with some caution. [email protected] is a Homebrew formula with a Nerq Trust Score of 54.8/100 (C-), based on 3 independent data dimensions. It is below the recommended threshold of 70. Security: 90/100. Popularity: 30/100. Data sourced from Homebrew formulae database and GitHub (homebrew-core). Last updated: 2026-04-03. Machine-readable data (JSON).
Is [email protected] safe?
CAUTION — [email protected] has a Nerq Trust Score of 54.8/100 (C-). It has moderate trust signals but shows some areas of concern that warrant attention. Suitable for development use — review security and maintenance signals before production deployment.
What is [email protected]'s trust score?
[email protected] has a Nerq Trust Score of 54.8/100, earning a C- grade. This score is based on 2 independently measured dimensions including security, maintenance, and community adoption.
What are the key security findings for [email protected]?
[email protected]'s strongest signal is security at 90/100. No known vulnerabilities have been detected. It has not yet reached the Nerq Verified threshold of 70+.
What is [email protected] and who maintains it?
| Author | Unknown |
| Category | homebrew |
| Source | N/A |
Similar Homebrew by Trust Score
Safety Guide: [email protected]
What is [email protected]?
[email protected] is a Homebrew formula — C library of Git core methods that is re-entrant and linkable.
How to Verify Safety
Homebrew formulas are community-reviewed. Check formulae.brew.sh.
You can also check the trust score via API: GET /v1/[email protected]
Key Safety Concerns for Homebrew formulas
When evaluating any Homebrew formula, watch for: source build integrity, dependency chain.
Trust Assessment
[email protected] has a Nerq Trust Score of 55/100 (C-) and has not yet reached Nerq trust threshold (70+). This score is based on automated analysis of security, maintenance, community, and quality signals.
Key Takeaways
- [email protected] has a Trust Score of 55/100 (C-).
- Review carefully before use — below trust threshold.
- Always verify independently using the Nerq API.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is [email protected] safe to use?
What is [email protected]'s trust score?
What are safer alternatives to [email protected]?
Is [email protected] actively maintained?
How was [email protected] reviewed?
Popular in homebrew
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.