Is Skyscanner Safe?
Skyscanner — Nerq Trust Score 48.2/100 (D grade). Score based on 2 independent trust signals. Last analyzed: 2026-04-12
Skyscanner is a website with a Nerq Trust Score of 48.2/100 (D), based on 3 independent data dimensions. Last analyzed: 2026-04-12 Security: 90/100. Popularity: 0/100. Data sourced from domain registration, SSL certificates, Tranco ranking, and web reputation databases. Last updated: 2026-04-12. Machine-readable data (JSON).
Is Skyscanner safe?
Trust Score Breakdown — Skyscanner has a Nerq Trust Score of 48.2/100 (D). Measured across 2 independent trust signals (as of 2026-04-12).
What is Skyscanner's trust score?
Skyscanner has a Nerq Trust Score of 48.2/100, earning a D grade. This score is based on 2 independently measured dimensions including security, maintenance, and community adoption.
What are the key security findings for Skyscanner?
Skyscanner's strongest signal is security at 90/100. No known vulnerabilities have been detected.
What is Skyscanner and who maintains it?
| Author | Unknown |
| Category | Websites |
| Source | N/A |
Skyscanner Across Platforms
Same developer/company in other registries:
Similar Website by Trust Score
Compare
Safety Guide: Skyscanner
What is Skyscanner?
Skyscanner is a website — UK-based travel search engine owned by Trip.com Group. Flight price comparison across airlines..
How to Verify Safety
Check domain age, SSL certificate, and security headers.
You can also check the trust score via API: GET /v1/preflight?target=Skyscanner
Key Safety Concerns for website
When evaluating any website, watch for: domain age, SSL validity, scam indicators.
Measured Signals
Skyscanner has a Nerq Trust Score of 48/100 (D). This score is a composite of automated measurements of security, maintenance, community, and quality signals.
Key Takeaways
- Skyscanner has a Trust Score of 48/100 (D).
- The score is a measured composite — it is not a suitability judgment. Evaluate the individual signals against your own requirements.
- Query the current measured values via the Nerq API.
Detailed Score Analysis
| Dimension | Score |
|---|---|
| Security | 90/100 |
| Maintenance | 50/100 |
| Popularity | 0/100 |
| Quality | 40/100 |
| Community | 35/100 |
Based on 5 dimensions. Data from domain registration, SSL certificates, Tranco ranking, and web reputation databases.
What data does Skyscanner collect?
Skyscanner: UK-based travel search engine owned by Trip.com Group. Flight price comparison across airlines.
Privacy score: 39/100. Review the privacy policy for data collection practices, cookie usage, and third-party tracking. Check for HTTPS encryption and transparent data handling.
Full analysis: Skyscanner Privacy Report · Privacy review
Is Skyscanner secure?
Security score: 90/100 (0-100, higher = fewer measured security issues).
Nerq monitors this entity against NVD, OSV.dev, and registry-specific vulnerability databases for ongoing security assessment.
Full analysis: Skyscanner Security Report
Skyscanner Across Platforms
Same developer/company in other registries:
How we calculated this score
Skyscanner's trust score of 48.2/100 (D) is computed from domain registration, SSL certificates, Tranco ranking, and web reputation databases. The score reflects 5 independent dimensions: security (90/100), maintenance (50/100), popularity (0/100), quality (40/100), community (35/100). Each dimension is weighted equally to produce the composite trust score.
Nerq analyzes over 7.5 million entities across 26 registries using the same methodology, enabling direct cross-entity comparison. Scores are updated continuously as new data becomes available.
Signals last measured on April 12, 2026. Data version: 1.0.
Full methodology documentation · Machine-readable data (JSON API)
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Skyscanner Safe?
What is Skyscanner's trust score?
What are safer alternatives to Skyscanner?
Is Skyscanner a scam?
Does Skyscanner protect my data?
Popular in Websites
Browse Categories
See Also
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated measurements based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements, verdicts, or guarantees of suitability. Always evaluate the signals against your own requirements.