Is Uniswap Safe?
Uniswap — Nerq Trust Score 63.2/100 (C+ grade). Score based on 2 independent trust signals. Last analyzed: 2026-04-12
Uniswap is a crypto exchange with a Nerq Trust Score of 63.2/100 (C+), based on 3 independent data dimensions. Last analyzed: 2026-04-12 Security: 90/100. Popularity: 100/100. Data sourced from multiple public sources including package registries, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev, and OpenSSF Scorecard. Last updated: 2026-04-12. Machine-readable data (JSON).
Is Uniswap safe?
Trust Score Breakdown — Uniswap has a Nerq Trust Score of 63.2/100 (C+). Measured across 2 independent trust signals (as of 2026-04-12).
What is Uniswap's trust score?
Uniswap has a Nerq Trust Score of 63.2/100, earning a C+ grade. This score is based on 2 independently measured dimensions including security, maintenance, and community adoption.
What are the key security findings for Uniswap?
Uniswap's strongest signal is popularity at 100/100. No known vulnerabilities have been detected.
What is Uniswap and who maintains it?
| Author | Unknown |
| Category | Crypto Exchanges |
| Stars | 15,000 |
| Source | N/A |
Uniswap Across Platforms
Same developer/company in other registries:
Similar Crypto by Trust Score
Safety Guide: Uniswap
What is Uniswap?
Uniswap is a crypto exchange — Uniswap is the largest decentralized exchange (DEX) on Ethereum. Founded 2018. Automated market maker (AMM) protocol. Open source. No KYC required. $1.5 trillion+ cumulative trading volume. Governance.
How to Verify Safety
Check regulatory status. Verify Proof of Reserves. Review incident history.
You can also check the trust score via API: GET /v1/preflight?target=Uniswap
Key Safety Concerns for crypto exchange
When evaluating any crypto exchange, watch for: regulatory compliance, security incidents, Proof of Reserves, jurisdiction.
Measured Signals
Uniswap has a Nerq Trust Score of 63/100 (C+). This score is a composite of automated measurements of security, maintenance, community, and quality signals.
Key Takeaways
- Uniswap has a Trust Score of 63/100 (C+).
- The score is a measured composite — it is not a suitability judgment. Evaluate the individual signals against your own requirements.
- Query the current measured values via the Nerq API.
Detailed Score Analysis
| Dimension | Score |
|---|---|
| Security | 90/100 |
| Maintenance | 50/100 |
| Popularity | 100/100 |
| Quality | 40/100 |
| Community | 35/100 |
Based on 5 dimensions. Data from multiple public sources including package registries, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev, and OpenSSF Scorecard.
What data does Uniswap collect?
Uniswap has a privacy score of 40/100. Review the documentation and privacy policy for data handling details.
Full analysis: Uniswap Privacy Report · Privacy review
Is Uniswap secure?
Security score: 90/100 (0-100, higher = fewer measured security issues).
Nerq monitors this entity against NVD, OSV.dev, and registry-specific vulnerability databases for ongoing security assessment.
Full analysis: Uniswap Security Report
Uniswap Across Platforms
Same developer/company in other registries:
How we calculated this score
Uniswap's trust score of 63.2/100 (C+) is computed from multiple public sources including package registries, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev, and OpenSSF Scorecard. The score reflects 5 independent dimensions: security (90/100), maintenance (50/100), popularity (100/100), quality (40/100), community (35/100). Each dimension is weighted equally to produce the composite trust score.
Nerq analyzes over 7.5 million entities across 26 registries using the same methodology, enabling direct cross-entity comparison. Scores are updated continuously as new data becomes available.
Signals last measured on April 12, 2026. Data version: 1.0.
Full methodology documentation · Machine-readable data (JSON API)
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Uniswap Safe?
What is Uniswap's trust score?
What are safer alternatives to Uniswap?
How often is Uniswap's safety score updated?
Can I use Uniswap in a regulated environment?
Popular in Crypto Exchanges
See Also
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated measurements based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements, verdicts, or guarantees of suitability. Always evaluate the signals against your own requirements.