Is Webdriveriedriver64 Safe?

Webdriveriedriver64 — Nerq Trust Score 53.2/100 (C- grade). Based on analysis of 2 trust dimensions, it is has notable safety concerns. Last updated: 2026-04-20.

Use Webdriveriedriver64 with some caution. Webdriveriedriver64 is a NuGet package with a Nerq Trust Score of 53.2/100 (C-), based on 3 independent data dimensions. Below the recommended threshold of 70. Security: 90/100. Popularity: 0/100. Data sourced from nuget.org, GitHub, and NVD. Last updated: 2026-03-20. Machine-readable data (JSON).

Is Webdriveriedriver64 safe?

CAUTION — Webdriveriedriver64 has a Nerq Trust Score of 53.2/100 (C-). It has moderate trust signals but shows some areas of concern that warrant attention. Suitable for development use — review security and maintenance signals before production deployment.

Security Analysis → Webdriveriedriver64 Privacy Report →

What is Webdriveriedriver64's trust score?

Webdriveriedriver64 has a Nerq Trust Score of 53.2/100, earning a C- grade. This score is based on 2 independently measured dimensions including security, maintenance, and community adoption.

Security
90
Popularity
0

What are the key security findings for Webdriveriedriver64?

Webdriveriedriver64's strongest signal is security at 90/100. No known vulnerabilities have been detected. It has not yet reached the Nerq Verified threshold of 70+.

Security score: 90/100 (strong)
Popularity: 0/100 — community adoption

What is Webdriveriedriver64 and who maintains it?

Authorselenium
CategoryNuGet Packages
SourceN/A

Webdriveriedriver64 Across Platforms

Same developer/company in other registries:

Selenium IDE
55/100 · firefox

Similar Nuget by Trust Score

Abp.RedisCache.ProtoBuf (62)Accelist.SDK.CoreMvc.Caching (62)Aardvark.PixImage.WindowsMedia (62)Abp.EntityFramework.Common (62)Abp.MailKit (62)
See all safest Nuget →

Compare

Webdriveriedriver64 vs Abp.RedisCache.ProtoBufWebdriveriedriver64 vs Accelist.SDK.CoreMvc.CachingWebdriveriedriver64 vs Aardvark.PixImage.WindowsMedia

Safety Guide: Webdriveriedriver64

What is Webdriveriedriver64?

Webdriveriedriver64 is a NuGet package — This package provides the WebDriver IEDriverServer.exe for allowing WebDriver to use 64 bit version of Internet Explorer for testing..

How to Verify Safety

Run dotnet list package --vulnerable. Check publisher on nuget.org.

You can also check the trust score via API: GET /v1/preflight?target=WebDriverIEDriver64

Key Safety Concerns for NuGet package

When evaluating any NuGet package, watch for: dependency vulnerabilities, publisher verification.

Trust Assessment

Webdriveriedriver64 has a Nerq Trust Score of 53/100 (C-) and has not yet reached Nerq trust threshold (70+). This score is based on automated analysis of security, maintenance, community, and quality signals.

Key Takeaways

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Webdriveriedriver64 Safe?
Use with some caution. WebDriverIEDriver64 with a Nerq Trust Score of 53.2/100 (C-). Strongest signal: security (90/100). Score based on Security (90/100), Popularity (0/100).
What is Webdriveriedriver64's trust score?
WebDriverIEDriver64: 53.2/100 (C-). Score based on Security (90/100), Popularity (0/100). Scores update as new data becomes available. API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=WebDriverIEDriver64
What are safer alternatives to Webdriveriedriver64?
In the NuGet Packages category, more NuGet packages are being analyzed — check back soon. WebDriverIEDriver64 scores 53.2/100.
Does Webdriveriedriver64 have known vulnerabilities?
Nerq checks Webdriveriedriver64 against NVD, OSV.dev, and registry-specific vulnerability databases. Current security score: 90/100. Run your package manager's audit command for the latest findings.
Is Webdriveriedriver64's publisher verified?
Webdriveriedriver64 has not reached the Nerq Verified threshold of 70. Additional due diligence is recommended.
API: /v1/preflight Trust Badge API Docs

See Also

Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.

We use cookies for analytics and caching. Privacy