Is Gcloud Functions Request Envelope Safe?

Gcloud Functions Request Envelope — Nerq Trust Score 48.2/100 (D grade). Score based on 2 independent trust signals. Last analyzed: 2026-03-25

Gcloud Functions Request Envelope is a npm package with a Nerq Trust Score of 48.2/100 (D), based on 3 independent data dimensions. Last analyzed: 2026-03-25 Security: 90/100. Popularity: 0/100. Data sourced from npm registry, GitHub repository, NVD, OSV.dev, and OpenSSF Scorecard. Last updated: 2026-03-25. Machine-readable data (JSON).

Is Gcloud Functions Request Envelope safe?

Trust Score Breakdown — Gcloud Functions Request Envelope has a Nerq Trust Score of 48.2/100 (D). Measured across 2 independent trust signals (as of 2026-03-25).

Security Analysis → Gcloud Functions Request Envelope Privacy Report →

What is Gcloud Functions Request Envelope's trust score?

Gcloud Functions Request Envelope has a Nerq Trust Score of 48.2/100, earning a D grade. This score is based on 2 independently measured dimensions including security, maintenance, and community adoption.

Security
90
Popularity
0

What are the key security findings for Gcloud Functions Request Envelope?

Gcloud Functions Request Envelope's strongest signal is security at 90/100. No known vulnerabilities have been detected.

✓Security score: 90/100 (strong)
⚠Popularity: 0/100 — community adoption

What is Gcloud Functions Request Envelope and who maintains it?

Authormateustozoni
Categorynpm Packages
SourceN/A

Similar Npm by Trust Score

react-library-boilerplate-for-npm (58)bindler (58)@yassidev/nuxt-directus (58)spectro-kubernetes-client (58)pocketto-svelte (58)
See all safest Npm →

Compare

Gcloud Functions Request Envelope vs react-library-boilerplate-for-npmGcloud Functions Request Envelope vs bindlerGcloud Functions Request Envelope vs @yassidev/nuxt-directus

Safety Guide: Gcloud Functions Request Envelope

What is Gcloud Functions Request Envelope?

Gcloud Functions Request Envelope is a Node.js package — A request facilitator for using the GCloud Functions (v2) in the easiest way, without loosing functionalities and facilitating the development.

How to Verify Safety

Run npm audit to check for vulnerabilities. Review the package's GitHub repository for recent commits.

You can also check the trust score via API: GET /v1/preflight?target=@whyper/gcloud-functions-request-envelope

Key Safety Concerns for Node.js package

When evaluating any Node.js package, watch for: dependency vulnerabilities, malicious packages, typosquatting.

Measured Signals

Gcloud Functions Request Envelope has a Nerq Trust Score of 48/100 (D). This score is a composite of automated measurements of security, maintenance, community, and quality signals.

Key Takeaways

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Gcloud Functions Request Envelope Safe?
@whyper/gcloud-functions-request-envelope with a Nerq Trust Score of 48.2/100 (D). Strongest signal: security (90/100). Score based on Security (90/100), Popularity (0/100).
What is Gcloud Functions Request Envelope's trust score?
@whyper/gcloud-functions-request-envelope: 48.2/100 (D). Score based on Security (90/100), Popularity (0/100). Scores update as new data becomes available. API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=@whyper/gcloud-functions-request-envelope
What are safer alternatives to Gcloud Functions Request Envelope?
In the npm Packages category, more Node.js packages are being analyzed — check back soon. @whyper/gcloud-functions-request-envelope scores 48.2/100.
Does Gcloud Functions Request Envelope have known vulnerabilities?
Nerq checks Gcloud Functions Request Envelope against NVD, OSV.dev, and registry-specific vulnerability databases. Current security score: 90/100. Run your package manager's audit command for the latest findings.
Is Gcloud Functions Request Envelope actively maintained?
Gcloud Functions Request Envelope maintenance score: N/A. Check the repository for recent commit activity and issue responsiveness.
API: /v1/preflight Trust Badge API Docs

See Also

Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated measurements based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements, verdicts, or guarantees of suitability. Always evaluate the signals against your own requirements.

We use cookies for analytics and caching. Privacy