Is Aws Sigv4 Safe?
Aws Sigv4 — Nerq Trust Score 68.2/100 (B- grade). Score based on 2 independent trust signals. Last analyzed: 2026-04-12
Aws Sigv4 is a Ruby gem with a Nerq Trust Score of 68.2/100 (B-), based on 3 independent data dimensions. Last analyzed: 2026-04-12 Security: 90/100. Popularity: 100/100. Data sourced from rubygems.org, GitHub, and NVD. Last updated: 2026-04-12. Machine-readable data (JSON).
Is Aws Sigv4 safe?
Trust Score Breakdown — Aws Sigv4 has a Nerq Trust Score of 68.2/100 (B-). Measured across 2 independent trust signals (as of 2026-04-12).
What is Aws Sigv4's trust score?
Aws Sigv4 has a Nerq Trust Score of 68.2/100, earning a B- grade. This score is based on 2 independently measured dimensions including security, maintenance, and community adoption.
What are the key security findings for Aws Sigv4?
Aws Sigv4's strongest signal is popularity at 100/100. No known vulnerabilities have been detected.
What is Aws Sigv4 and who maintains it?
| Author | Amazon Web Services |
| Category | Ruby Gems |
| Source | N/A |
Aws Sigv4 Across Platforms
Same developer/company in other registries:
Similar Gems by Trust Score
Safety Guide: Aws Sigv4
What is Aws Sigv4?
Aws Sigv4 is a Ruby gem — Amazon Web Services Signature Version 4 signing library. Generates sigv4 signature for HTTP requests..
How to Verify Safety
Run bundle audit. Review on rubygems.org.
You can also check the trust score via API: GET /v1/preflight?target=aws-sigv4
Key Safety Concerns for Ruby gem
When evaluating any Ruby gem, watch for: dependency vulnerabilities, maintenance status.
Measured Signals
Aws Sigv4 has a Nerq Trust Score of 68/100 (B-). This score is a composite of automated measurements of security, maintenance, community, and quality signals.
Key Takeaways
- Aws Sigv4 has a Trust Score of 68/100 (B-).
- The score is a measured composite — it is not a suitability judgment. Evaluate the individual signals against your own requirements.
- Query the current measured values via the Nerq API.
Detailed Score Analysis
| Dimension | Score |
|---|---|
| Security | 90/100 |
| Maintenance | 50/100 |
| Popularity | 100/100 |
| Quality | 65/100 |
| Community | 35/100 |
Based on 5 dimensions. Data from rubygems.org, GitHub, and NVD.
What data does Aws Sigv4 collect?
Aws Sigv4 is a Ruby gem maintained by Amazon Web Services. It receives approximately 1,454,103,766 weekly downloads. Licensed under Apache-2.0.
As a development package, Aws Sigv4 does not directly collect end-user personal data. However, applications built with it may collect data depending on implementation. Privacy score: 80/100.
Review the package's dependencies for potential supply chain risks. Run your package manager's audit command regularly.
Full analysis: Aws Sigv4 Privacy Report · Privacy review
Is Aws Sigv4 secure?
Security score: 90/100 (0-100, higher = fewer measured security issues).
Nerq monitors this entity against NVD, OSV.dev, and registry-specific vulnerability databases for ongoing security assessment.
Full analysis: Aws Sigv4 Security Report
Aws Sigv4 Across Platforms
Same developer/company in other registries:
How we calculated this score
Aws Sigv4's trust score of 68.2/100 (B-) is computed from rubygems.org, GitHub, and NVD. The score reflects 5 independent dimensions: security (90/100), maintenance (50/100), popularity (100/100), quality (65/100), community (35/100). Each dimension is weighted equally to produce the composite trust score.
Nerq analyzes over 7.5 million entities across 26 registries using the same methodology, enabling direct cross-entity comparison. Scores are updated continuously as new data becomes available.
Signals last measured on April 12, 2026. Data version: 1.0.
Full methodology documentation · Machine-readable data (JSON API)
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Aws Sigv4 Safe?
What is Aws Sigv4's trust score?
What are safer alternatives to Aws Sigv4?
Does Aws Sigv4 have known vulnerabilities?
Is Aws Sigv4 actively maintained?
Popular in Ruby Gems
See Also
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated measurements based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements, verdicts, or guarantees of suitability. Always evaluate the signals against your own requirements.