Is Backports Datetime Fromisoformat Safe?

Backports Datetime Fromisoformat — Nerq Trust Score 68.5/100 (B- grade). Score based on 2 independent trust signals. Last analyzed: 2026-04-12

Backports Datetime Fromisoformat is a Python package with a Nerq Trust Score of 68.5/100 (B-), based on 3 independent data dimensions. Last analyzed: 2026-04-12 Security: 90/100. Popularity: 90/100. Data sourced from PyPI registry, GitHub repository, NVD, OSV.dev, and OpenSSF Scorecard. Last updated: 2026-04-12. Machine-readable data (JSON).

Is Backports Datetime Fromisoformat safe?

Trust Score Breakdown — Backports Datetime Fromisoformat has a Nerq Trust Score of 68.5/100 (B-). Measured across 2 independent trust signals (as of 2026-04-12).

Security Analysis → Backports Datetime Fromisoformat Privacy Report →

What is Backports Datetime Fromisoformat's trust score?

Backports Datetime Fromisoformat has a Nerq Trust Score of 68.5/100, earning a B- grade. This score is based on 2 independently measured dimensions including security, maintenance, and community adoption.

Security
90
Popularity
90

What are the key security findings for Backports Datetime Fromisoformat?

Backports Datetime Fromisoformat's strongest signal is security at 90/100. No known vulnerabilities have been detected.

Security score: 90/100 (strong)
Popularity: 90/100 — community adoption

What is Backports Datetime Fromisoformat and who maintains it?

AuthorUnknown
CategoryPython Packages
SourceN/A

Similar Pypi by Trust Score

azure-monitor-opentelemetry-exporter (78)pyyaml (78)altair (78)polars (78)certifi (78)
See all safest Pypi →

Compare

Backports Datetime Fromisoformat vs azure-monitor-opentelemetry-exporterBackports Datetime Fromisoformat vs pyyamlBackports Datetime Fromisoformat vs altair

Safety Guide: Backports Datetime Fromisoformat

What is Backports Datetime Fromisoformat?

Backports Datetime Fromisoformat is a Python package — Backport of Python 3.11's datetime.fromisoformat.

How to Verify Safety

Run pip audit or safety check. Review on PyPI for download stats.

You can also check the trust score via API: GET /v1/preflight?target=backports-datetime-fromisoformat

Key Safety Concerns for Python package

When evaluating any Python package, watch for: dependency vulnerabilities, malicious uploads, maintenance status.

Measured Signals

Backports Datetime Fromisoformat has a Nerq Trust Score of 68/100 (B-). This score is a composite of automated measurements of security, maintenance, community, and quality signals.

Key Takeaways

Detailed Score Analysis

DimensionScore
Security90/100
Maintenance57/100
Popularity90/100
Quality65/100
Community35/100

Based on 5 dimensions. Data from PyPI registry, GitHub repository, NVD, OSV.dev, and OpenSSF Scorecard.

What data does Backports Datetime Fromisoformat collect?

Backports Datetime Fromisoformat is a Python package maintained by Unknown. It receives approximately 2,319,856 weekly downloads. Licensed under MIT License Copyright (c) 2018 Michael Overmeyer Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to .

As a development package, Backports Datetime Fromisoformat does not directly collect end-user personal data. However, applications built with it may collect data depending on implementation. Privacy score: 80/100.

Review the package's dependencies for potential supply chain risks. Run your package manager's audit command regularly.

Full analysis: Backports Datetime Fromisoformat Privacy Report · Privacy review

Is Backports Datetime Fromisoformat secure?

Security score: 90/100. Backports Datetime Fromisoformat has 0 known vulnerabilities (CVEs) in the National Vulnerability Database. This is a clean record.

Licensed under MIT License Copyright (c) 2018 Michael Overmeyer Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to , allowing code inspection. Open-source packages allow independent security review of the source code.

Run your package manager's audit command (`npm audit`, `pip audit`, `cargo audit`) to check for known vulnerabilities in your dependency tree.

Full analysis: Backports Datetime Fromisoformat Security Report

How we calculated this score

Backports Datetime Fromisoformat's trust score of 68.5/100 (B-) is computed from PyPI registry, GitHub repository, NVD, OSV.dev, and OpenSSF Scorecard. The score reflects 5 independent dimensions: security (90/100), maintenance (57/100), popularity (90/100), quality (65/100), community (35/100). Each dimension is weighted equally to produce the composite trust score.

Nerq analyzes over 7.5 million entities across 26 registries using the same methodology, enabling direct cross-entity comparison. Scores are updated continuously as new data becomes available.

Signals last measured on April 12, 2026. Data version: 1.0.

Full methodology documentation · Machine-readable data (JSON API)

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Backports Datetime Fromisoformat Safe?
backports-datetime-fromisoformat with a Nerq Trust Score of 68.5/100 (B-). Strongest signal: security (90/100). Score based on Security (90/100), Popularity (90/100).
What is Backports Datetime Fromisoformat's trust score?
backports-datetime-fromisoformat: 68.5/100 (B-). Score based on Security (90/100), Popularity (90/100). Scores update as new data becomes available. API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=backports-datetime-fromisoformat
What are safer alternatives to Backports Datetime Fromisoformat?
In the Python Packages category, more Python packages are being analyzed — check back soon. backports-datetime-fromisoformat scores 68.5/100.
Does Backports Datetime Fromisoformat have known vulnerabilities?
Nerq checks Backports Datetime Fromisoformat against NVD, OSV.dev, and registry-specific vulnerability databases. Current security score: 90/100. Run your package manager's audit command for the latest findings.
Is Backports Datetime Fromisoformat actively maintained?
Backports Datetime Fromisoformat maintenance score: N/A. Check the repository for recent commit activity and issue responsiveness.
API: /v1/preflight Trust Badge API Docs

See Also

Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated measurements based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements, verdicts, or guarantees of suitability. Always evaluate the signals against your own requirements.

We use cookies for analytics and caching. Privacy