Is Faq Safe?
Faq — Nerq Trust Score 48.2/100 (D grade). Score based on 2 independent trust signals. Last analyzed: 2026-03-24
Faq is a PHP package with a Nerq Trust Score of 48.2/100 (D), based on 3 independent data dimensions. Last analyzed: 2026-03-24 Security: 90/100. Popularity: 0/100. Data sourced from packagist.org, GitHub, and NVD. Last updated: 2026-03-24. Machine-readable data (JSON).
Is Faq safe?
Trust Score Breakdown — Faq has a Nerq Trust Score of 48.2/100 (D). Measured across 2 independent trust signals (as of 2026-03-24).
What is Faq's trust score?
Faq has a Nerq Trust Score of 48.2/100, earning a D grade. This score is based on 2 independently measured dimensions including security, maintenance, and community adoption.
What are the key security findings for Faq?
Faq's strongest signal is security at 90/100. No known vulnerabilities have been detected.
What is Faq and who maintains it?
| Author | cmworking |
| Category | PHP Packages |
| Source | N/A |
Similar Packagist by Trust Score
Safety Guide: Faq
What is Faq?
Faq is a PHP package — Test module install using composer.
How to Verify Safety
Run composer audit. Check packagist.org.
You can also check the trust score via API: GET /v1/preflight?target=cmworking/faq
Key Safety Concerns for PHP package
When evaluating any PHP package, watch for: dependency vulnerabilities, PHP compatibility.
Measured Signals
Faq has a Nerq Trust Score of 48/100 (D). This score is a composite of automated measurements of security, maintenance, community, and quality signals.
Key Takeaways
- Faq has a Trust Score of 48/100 (D).
- The score is a measured composite — it is not a suitability judgment. Evaluate the individual signals against your own requirements.
- Query the current measured values via the Nerq API.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Faq Safe?
What is Faq's trust score?
What are safer alternatives to Faq?
Does Faq have known vulnerabilities?
Is Faq actively maintained?
Popular in PHP Packages
See Also
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated measurements based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements, verdicts, or guarantees of suitability. Always evaluate the signals against your own requirements.