Is Multipart Post Safe?
Multipart Post — Nerq Trust Score 68.2/100 (B- grade). Score based on 2 independent trust signals. Last analyzed: 2026-04-12
Multipart Post is a Ruby gem with a Nerq Trust Score of 68.2/100 (B-), based on 3 independent data dimensions. Last analyzed: 2026-04-12 Security: 90/100. Popularity: 100/100. Data sourced from rubygems.org, GitHub, and NVD. Last updated: 2026-04-12. Machine-readable data (JSON).
Is Multipart Post safe?
Trust Score Breakdown — Multipart Post has a Nerq Trust Score of 68.2/100 (B-). Measured across 2 independent trust signals (as of 2026-04-12).
What is Multipart Post's trust score?
Multipart Post has a Nerq Trust Score of 68.2/100, earning a B- grade. This score is based on 2 independently measured dimensions including security, maintenance, and community adoption.
What are the key security findings for Multipart Post?
Multipart Post's strongest signal is popularity at 100/100. No known vulnerabilities have been detected.
What is Multipart Post and who maintains it?
| Author | Nick Sieger, Samuel Williams, Olle Jonsson |
| Category | Ruby Gems |
| Source | N/A |
Similar Gems by Trust Score
Compare
Safety Guide: Multipart Post
What is Multipart Post?
Multipart Post is a Ruby gem — A multipart form post accessory for Net::HTTP..
How to Verify Safety
Run bundle audit. Review on rubygems.org.
You can also check the trust score via API: GET /v1/preflight?target=multipart-post
Key Safety Concerns for Ruby gem
When evaluating any Ruby gem, watch for: dependency vulnerabilities, maintenance status.
Measured Signals
Multipart Post has a Nerq Trust Score of 68/100 (B-). This score is a composite of automated measurements of security, maintenance, community, and quality signals.
Key Takeaways
- Multipart Post has a Trust Score of 68/100 (B-).
- The score is a measured composite — it is not a suitability judgment. Evaluate the individual signals against your own requirements.
- Query the current measured values via the Nerq API.
Detailed Score Analysis
| Dimension | Score |
|---|---|
| Security | 90/100 |
| Maintenance | 50/100 |
| Popularity | 100/100 |
| Quality | 65/100 |
| Community | 35/100 |
Based on 5 dimensions. Data from rubygems.org, GitHub, and NVD.
What data does Multipart Post collect?
Multipart Post is a Ruby gem maintained by Nick Sieger, Samuel Williams, Olle Jonsson. It receives approximately 858,352,968 weekly downloads. Licensed under MIT.
As a development package, Multipart Post does not directly collect end-user personal data. However, applications built with it may collect data depending on implementation. Privacy score: 80/100.
Review the package's dependencies for potential supply chain risks. Run your package manager's audit command regularly.
Full analysis: Multipart Post Privacy Report · Privacy review
Is Multipart Post secure?
Security score: 90/100 (0-100, higher = fewer measured security issues).
Nerq monitors this entity against NVD, OSV.dev, and registry-specific vulnerability databases for ongoing security assessment.
Full analysis: Multipart Post Security Report
How we calculated this score
Multipart Post's trust score of 68.2/100 (B-) is computed from rubygems.org, GitHub, and NVD. The score reflects 5 independent dimensions: security (90/100), maintenance (50/100), popularity (100/100), quality (65/100), community (35/100). Each dimension is weighted equally to produce the composite trust score.
Nerq analyzes over 7.5 million entities across 26 registries using the same methodology, enabling direct cross-entity comparison. Scores are updated continuously as new data becomes available.
Signals last measured on April 12, 2026. Data version: 1.0.
Full methodology documentation · Machine-readable data (JSON API)
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Multipart Post Safe?
What is Multipart Post's trust score?
What are safer alternatives to Multipart Post?
Does Multipart Post have known vulnerabilities?
Is Multipart Post actively maintained?
Popular in Ruby Gems
See Also
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated measurements based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements, verdicts, or guarantees of suitability. Always evaluate the signals against your own requirements.