Is Open Llm Leaderboard Safe?

Open Llm Leaderboard — Nerq Trust Score 49.8/100 (D grade). Score based on 1 independent trust signals.

Open Llm Leaderboard is a software tool with a Nerq Trust Score of 49.8/100 (D), based on 3 independent data dimensions. Data sourced from multiple public sources including package registries, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev, and OpenSSF Scorecard. Last updated: n/a. Machine-readable data (JSON).

Is Open Llm Leaderboard safe?

Trust Score Breakdown — Open Llm Leaderboard has a Nerq Trust Score of 49.8/100 (D). Measured across 1 independent trust signal.

Security Analysis → Open Llm Leaderboard Privacy Report →

What is Open Llm Leaderboard's trust score?

Open Llm Leaderboard has a Nerq Trust Score of 49.8/100, earning a D grade. This score is based on 1 independently measured dimensions including security, maintenance, and community adoption.

Compliance
100

What are the key security findings for Open Llm Leaderboard?

Open Llm Leaderboard's strongest signal is compliance at 100/100. No known vulnerabilities have been detected.

Compliance: 100/100 — covers 52 of 52 jurisdictions

What is Open Llm Leaderboard and who maintains it?

AuthorYeganeh
CategoryUncategorized
Sourcehttps://huggingface.co/datasets/Yeganeh/open-llm-leaderboard
Protocolshuggingface_hub

Regulatory Compliance

EU AI Act Risk ClassNot assessed
Compliance Score100/100
JurisdictionsAssessed across 52 jurisdictions

What Is Open Llm Leaderboard?

Open Llm Leaderboard is a software tool in the uncategorized category available on huggingface_dataset_full. Nerq Trust Score: 50/100 (D).

Nerq independently analyzes every software tool, app, and extension across multiple trust signals including security vulnerabilities, maintenance activity, license compliance, and community adoption.

How Nerq Assesses Open Llm Leaderboard's Safety

Nerq's Trust Score is calculated from 13+ independent signals aggregated into five dimensions. Here is how Open Llm Leaderboard performs in each:

The overall Trust Score of 49.8/100 (D) is the weighted combination of these measured signals. It is a measurement, not a pass/fail or suitability judgment — weigh the individual signals against your own requirements.

Who Typically Evaluates Open Llm Leaderboard?

Open Llm Leaderboard is commonly evaluated by:

How to read the signals: Open Llm Leaderboard's measured signals (the trust signals above) are shown above. These are measurements, not a suitability judgment — weigh each signal against the requirements of your own use case and risk tolerance.

How to Verify Open Llm Leaderboard's Safety Yourself

While Nerq provides automated trust analysis, we recommend these additional steps before adopting any software tool:

  1. Check the source code — Review the repository security policy, open issues, and recent commits for signs of active maintenance.
  2. Scan dependencies — Use tools like npm audit, pip-audit, or snyk to check for known vulnerabilities in Open Llm Leaderboard's dependency tree.
  3. Review permissions — Understand what access Open Llm Leaderboard requires. Software tools should follow the principle of least privilege.
  4. Test in isolation — Run Open Llm Leaderboard in a sandboxed environment before granting access to production data or systems.
  5. Monitor continuously — Use Nerq's API to set up automated trust checks: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=open-llm-leaderboard
  6. Review the license — Confirm that Open Llm Leaderboard's license is compatible with your intended use case. Pay attention to restrictions on commercial use, redistribution, and derivative works. Some AI tools use dual licensing or have separate terms for enterprise customers that differ from the open-source license.
  7. Check community signals — Look at the project's issue tracker, discussion forums, and social media presence. A healthy community actively reports bugs, contributes fixes, and discusses security concerns openly. Low community engagement may indicate limited peer review of the codebase.

Common Safety Concerns with Open Llm Leaderboard

When evaluating whether Open Llm Leaderboard is safe, consider these category-specific risks:

Data handling

Understand how Open Llm Leaderboard processes, stores, and transmits your data. Review the tool's privacy policy and data retention practices, especially for sensitive or proprietary information.

Dependency security

Check Open Llm Leaderboard's dependency tree for known vulnerabilities. Tools with outdated or unmaintained dependencies pose a higher security risk.

Update frequency

Regularly check for updates to Open Llm Leaderboard. Security patches and bug fixes are only effective if you're running the latest version.

Third-party integrations

If Open Llm Leaderboard connects to external APIs or services, each integration point is a potential attack surface. Audit all third-party connections, verify that data shared with external services is minimized, and ensure that integration credentials are rotated regularly.

License and IP compliance

Verify that Open Llm Leaderboard's license is compatible with your intended use case. Some AI tools have restrictive licenses that limit commercial use, redistribution, or derivative works. Using Open Llm Leaderboard in violation of its license can expose your organization to legal liability.

Best Practices for Using Open Llm Leaderboard Safely

Whether you're an individual developer or an enterprise team, these practices will help you get the most from Open Llm Leaderboard while minimizing risk:

Conduct regular audits

Periodically review how Open Llm Leaderboard is used in your workflow. Check for unexpected behavior, permissions drift, and compliance with your security policies.

Keep dependencies updated

Ensure Open Llm Leaderboard and all its dependencies are running the latest stable versions to benefit from security patches.

Follow least privilege

Grant Open Llm Leaderboard only the minimum permissions it needs to function. Avoid granting admin or root access.

Monitor for security advisories

Subscribe to Open Llm Leaderboard's security advisories and vulnerability disclosures. Use Nerq's API to get automated trust score updates.

Document usage policies

Create and maintain a clear policy for how Open Llm Leaderboard is used within your organization, including data handling guidelines and acceptable use cases.

Situations That Warrant Independent Review of Open Llm Leaderboard

Nerq's signals are one input. In the following situations, evaluate Open Llm Leaderboard's measured signals against your own requirements before making a decision:

For each situation, compare Open Llm Leaderboard's measured trust score of 49.8/100 and its individual signals against your organization's own criteria. Nerq does not assert whether Open Llm Leaderboard is suitable for any particular use.

How Open Llm Leaderboard Compares to Industry Standards

Nerq indexes over 6 million software tools, apps, and packages across dozens of categories. Among uncategorized tools, the average Trust Score is 62/100. Open Llm Leaderboard's score of 49.8/100 is below the category average of 62/100.

This suggests that Open Llm Leaderboard trails behind many comparable uncategorized tools. Organizations with strict security requirements should evaluate whether higher-scoring alternatives better meet their needs.

Industry benchmarks matter because they contextualize a tool's safety profile. A score that looks moderate in isolation may actually represent strong performance within a challenging category — or vice versa. Nerq's category-relative analysis helps teams make informed decisions by showing not just absolute quality, but how a tool ranks against its direct peers.

Trust Score History

Nerq continuously monitors Open Llm Leaderboard and recalculates its Trust Score as new data becomes available. Our scoring engine ingests real-time signals from source repositories, vulnerability databases (NVD, OSV.dev), package registries, and community metrics. When a new CVE is published, a major release ships, or maintenance patterns change, Open Llm Leaderboard's score is updated within 24 hours.

Historical trust trends reveal whether a tool is improving, stable, or declining over time. A tool that consistently maintains or improves its score demonstrates ongoing commitment to security and quality. Conversely, a downward trend may signal reduced maintenance, growing technical debt, or unresolved vulnerabilities. To track Open Llm Leaderboard's score over time, use the Nerq API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=open-llm-leaderboard&include=history

Nerq retains trust score snapshots at regular intervals, enabling trend analysis across weeks and months. Enterprise users can access detailed historical reports showing how each dimension — security, maintenance, documentation, compliance, and community — has evolved independently, providing granular visibility into which aspects of Open Llm Leaderboard are strengthening or weakening over time.

Key Takeaways

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Open Llm Leaderboard Safe?
open-llm-leaderboard with a Nerq Trust Score of 49.8/100 (D). Strongest signal: compliance (100/100). Score based on multiple trust dimensions.
What is Open Llm Leaderboard's trust score?
open-llm-leaderboard: 49.8/100 (D). Score based on multiple trust dimensions. Compliance: 100/100. Scores update as new data becomes available. API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=open-llm-leaderboard
What are safer alternatives to Open Llm Leaderboard?
In the Uncategorized category, more software tools are being analyzed — check back soon. open-llm-leaderboard scores 49.8/100.
How often is Open Llm Leaderboard's safety score updated?
Nerq recomputes Open Llm Leaderboard's trust score as new data becomes available. Current: 49.8/100 (D). API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=open-llm-leaderboard
Can I use Open Llm Leaderboard in a regulated environment?
Open Llm Leaderboard: 49.8/100 (D). Compliance: 52 of 52 jurisdictions. Evaluate against your own regulatory requirements.
API: /v1/preflight Trust Badge API Docs

See Also

Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated measurements based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements, verdicts, or guarantees of suitability. Always evaluate the signals against your own requirements.

We use cookies for analytics and caching. Privacy