Is Ckeditor5 Build Strapi Safe?

Ckeditor5 Build Strapi — Nerq Trust Score 48.2/100 (D grade). Based on analysis of 2 trust dimensions, it is has notable safety concerns. Last updated: 2026-05-28.

Exercise caution with Ckeditor5 Build Strapi. Ckeditor5 Build Strapi is a npm package with a Nerq Trust Score of 48.2/100 (D), based on 3 independent data dimensions. Below the recommended threshold of 70. Security: 90/100. Popularity: 0/100. Data sourced from npm registry, GitHub repository, NVD, OSV.dev, and OpenSSF Scorecard. Last updated: 2026-03-25. Machine-readable data (JSON).

Is Ckeditor5 Build Strapi safe?

NO — USE WITH CAUTION — Ckeditor5 Build Strapi has a Nerq Trust Score of 48.2/100 (D). It has below-average trust signals with significant gaps in security, maintenance, or documentation. Not recommended for production use without thorough manual review and additional security measures.

Security Analysis → Ckeditor5 Build Strapi Privacy Report →

What is Ckeditor5 Build Strapi's trust score?

Ckeditor5 Build Strapi has a Nerq Trust Score of 48.2/100, earning a D grade. This score is based on 2 independently measured dimensions including security, maintenance, and community adoption.

Security
90
Popularity
0

What are the key security findings for Ckeditor5 Build Strapi?

Ckeditor5 Build Strapi's strongest signal is security at 90/100. No known vulnerabilities have been detected. It has not yet reached the Nerq Verified threshold of 70+.

Security score: 90/100 (strong)
Popularity: 0/100 — community adoption

What is Ckeditor5 Build Strapi and who maintains it?

Authorpaukparl
Categorynpm Packages
SourceN/A

Similar Npm by Trust Score

bitcoin-ui-react (58)generator-hapi-api-stack (58)aipim (58)wcj (58)@rkumwt/express-rest-api (58)
See all safest Npm →

Compare

Ckeditor5 Build Strapi vs bitcoin-ui-reactCkeditor5 Build Strapi vs generator-hapi-api-stackCkeditor5 Build Strapi vs aipim

Safety Guide: Ckeditor5 Build Strapi

What is Ckeditor5 Build Strapi?

Ckeditor5 Build Strapi is a Node.js package — The classic editor build of CKEditor 5 – the best browser-based rich text editor..

How to Verify Safety

Run npm audit to check for vulnerabilities. Review the package's GitHub repository for recent commits.

You can also check the trust score via API: GET /v1/preflight?target=@paukparl/ckeditor5-build-strapi

Key Safety Concerns for Node.js package

When evaluating any Node.js package, watch for: dependency vulnerabilities, malicious packages, typosquatting.

Trust Assessment

Ckeditor5 Build Strapi has a Nerq Trust Score of 48/100 (D) and has not yet reached Nerq trust threshold (70+). This score is based on automated analysis of security, maintenance, community, and quality signals.

Key Takeaways

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Ckeditor5 Build Strapi Safe?
Exercise caution. @paukparl/ckeditor5-build-strapi with a Nerq Trust Score of 48.2/100 (D). Strongest signal: security (90/100). Score based on Security (90/100), Popularity (0/100).
What is Ckeditor5 Build Strapi's trust score?
@paukparl/ckeditor5-build-strapi: 48.2/100 (D). Score based on Security (90/100), Popularity (0/100). Scores update as new data becomes available. API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=@paukparl/ckeditor5-build-strapi
What are safer alternatives to Ckeditor5 Build Strapi?
In the npm Packages category, more Node.js packages are being analyzed — check back soon. @paukparl/ckeditor5-build-strapi scores 48.2/100.
Does Ckeditor5 Build Strapi have known vulnerabilities?
Nerq checks Ckeditor5 Build Strapi against NVD, OSV.dev, and registry-specific vulnerability databases. Current security score: 90/100. Run your package manager's audit command for the latest findings.
Is Ckeditor5 Build Strapi actively maintained?
Ckeditor5 Build Strapi maintenance score: N/A. Check the repository for recent commit activity and issue responsiveness.
API: /v1/preflight Trust Badge API Docs

See Also

Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.

We use cookies for analytics and caching. Privacy