Is Sigar Safe?
Sigar — Nerq Trust Score 61.8/100 (C+ grade). Score based on 2 independent trust signals. Last analyzed: 2026-03-22
Sigar is a Ruby gem with a Nerq Trust Score of 61.8/100 (C+), based on 3 independent data dimensions. Last analyzed: 2026-03-22 Security: 90/100. Popularity: 90/100. Data sourced from rubygems.org, GitHub, and NVD. Last updated: 2026-03-22. Machine-readable data (JSON).
Is Sigar safe?
Trust Score Breakdown — Sigar has a Nerq Trust Score of 61.8/100 (C+). Measured across 2 independent trust signals (as of 2026-03-22).
What is Sigar's trust score?
Sigar has a Nerq Trust Score of 61.8/100, earning a C+ grade. This score is based on 2 independently measured dimensions including security, maintenance, and community adoption.
What are the key security findings for Sigar?
Sigar's strongest signal is security at 90/100. No known vulnerabilities have been detected.
What is Sigar and who maintains it?
| Author | Doug MacEachern |
| Category | Ruby Gems |
| Source | N/A |
Similar Gems by Trust Score
Safety Guide: Sigar
What is Sigar?
Sigar is a Ruby gem — System Information Gatherer And Reporter.
How to Verify Safety
Run bundle audit. Review on rubygems.org.
You can also check the trust score via API: GET /v1/preflight?target=sigar
Key Safety Concerns for Ruby gem
When evaluating any Ruby gem, watch for: dependency vulnerabilities, maintenance status.
Measured Signals
Sigar has a Nerq Trust Score of 62/100 (C+). This score is a composite of automated measurements of security, maintenance, community, and quality signals.
Key Takeaways
- Sigar has a Trust Score of 62/100 (C+).
- The score is a measured composite — it is not a suitability judgment. Evaluate the individual signals against your own requirements.
- Query the current measured values via the Nerq API.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Sigar Safe?
What is Sigar's trust score?
What are safer alternatives to Sigar?
Does Sigar have known vulnerabilities?
Is Sigar actively maintained?
Popular in Ruby Gems
See Also
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated measurements based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements, verdicts, or guarantees of suitability. Always evaluate the signals against your own requirements.