Is Civo Safe?
Civo — Nerq Trust Score 64.5/100 (C+ grade). Score based on 2 independent trust signals. Last analyzed: 2026-03-23
Civo is a Ruby gem with a Nerq Trust Score of 64.5/100 (C+), based on 3 independent data dimensions. Last analyzed: 2026-03-23 Security: 90/100. Popularity: 75/100. Data sourced from rubygems.org, GitHub, and NVD. Last updated: 2026-03-23. Machine-readable data (JSON).
Is Civo safe?
Trust Score Breakdown — Civo has a Nerq Trust Score of 64.5/100 (C+). Measured across 2 independent trust signals (as of 2026-03-23).
What is Civo's trust score?
Civo has a Nerq Trust Score of 64.5/100, earning a C+ grade. This score is based on 2 independently measured dimensions including security, maintenance, and community adoption.
What are the key security findings for Civo?
Civo's strongest signal is security at 90/100. No known vulnerabilities have been detected.
What is Civo and who maintains it?
| Author | Andy Jeffries |
| Category | Ruby Gems |
| Source | N/A |
Similar Gems by Trust Score
Safety Guide: Civo
What is Civo?
Civo is a Ruby gem — A command-line client and API access classes for civo.com.
How to Verify Safety
Run bundle audit. Review on rubygems.org.
You can also check the trust score via API: GET /v1/preflight?target=civo
Key Safety Concerns for Ruby gem
When evaluating any Ruby gem, watch for: dependency vulnerabilities, maintenance status.
Measured Signals
Civo has a Nerq Trust Score of 64/100 (C+). This score is a composite of automated measurements of security, maintenance, community, and quality signals.
Key Takeaways
- Civo has a Trust Score of 64/100 (C+).
- The score is a measured composite — it is not a suitability judgment. Evaluate the individual signals against your own requirements.
- Query the current measured values via the Nerq API.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Civo Safe?
What is Civo's trust score?
What are safer alternatives to Civo?
Does Civo have known vulnerabilities?
Is Civo actively maintained?
See Also
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated measurements based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements, verdicts, or guarantees of suitability. Always evaluate the signals against your own requirements.